Original Research: A Real 'Voice' or 'Lip Service'? Experiences of Staff Nurses Who Have Served on Staffing Committees.

BACKGROUND: Nurse staffing committees offer a means for improving nurse staffing and nursing work environments in hospital settings by giving direct care nurses opportunities to contribute to staffing decision-making. These committees may be mandated by state law, as is the case currently in nine U.S. states, yet little is known about the experiences of staff nurses who have served on them. PURPOSE AND DESIGN: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted to explore the experiences of direct care nurses who have served on nurse staffing committees, and to better understand how such committees operate. METHODS: Participants were recruited by sharing information about the study through online nursing organization platforms, hospital nurse leadership, state chapters of national nursing organizations, social media, and nonconfidential nursing email lists. A total of 14 nurses from five U.S. states that have had nurse staffing committee legislation in place for at least three years were interviewed between April and October 2022. RESULTS: Four themes were identified from the data-a "well-valued" committee versus one with "locked away" potential: committee value; "who benefits": staffing committee beneficiaries; "not just the numbers": defining adequate staffing; and "constantly pushing": committee members' persistence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the importance of actualizing staff nurse autonomy within nurse staffing committees-and invite further exploration into how staff nurses' perspectives can be better valued by nursing and nonnursing hospital leadership. Nurse staffing committees generally recommend staffing-related policies and practices that address the needs of patients and nurses, and work to find areas of compromise between nursing and hospital entities. But to be effective, the state laws that govern nurse staffing committees should be enforceable and evaluable, while committee practices should contribute to positive patient, nurse, and organizational outcomes; otherwise, they're just another form of paying lip service to change.

Perceptions of access to care after a rural hospital closure in an economically distressed county of Appalachian Tennessee.

PURPOSE: The rise in rural hospital closures has sparked concern about the potential loss of essential health care services for rural communities. It is crucial to incorporate the perspectives of community residents, which have been largely missing from the literature, when devising strategies to improve health care for this population. The purpose of this study was to describe community residents' perceptions of access to care following a rural hospital closure in an economically distressed Appalachian county of Tennessee. METHODS: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach to illustrate how community residents perceive accessing care post hospital closure. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 community residents via telephone in May through August of 2020. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. FINDINGS: Five themes were identified based on Penchansky and Thomas' framework of health care: accessibility, availability, affordability, accommodation, and acceptability. Accessibility was identified as the most common concern among participants. Specifically, participants perceived longer travel times to receive care, reduced availability of emergency and specialty care, increased costs associated with ambulance services, and extended wait times to see providers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a critical perspective to inform local leaders and policymakers on the impacts of a hospital closure in a rural community. As rural hospitals continue to close, it is crucial to develop multi-level, community-driven solutions to ensure access to care for rural communities.

Using Geographic Information Systems in health disparities research: Access to care considerations.

In health disparities research, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provide nurse researchers with powerful tools to incorporate spatial factors, such as access to care and related attributes like socioeconomic and environmental characteristics, into their studies. This article educates nurse scientists about GIS-based research benefits and considerations (focusing on access-to-care factors) and the influence of various access-to-care metrics on research outcomes. We present an overview of GIS in nursing and health disparities research, along with findings from our 2022 study examining access to care's relationship with county-level mortality rates in Tennessee, especially in areas where rural hospitals closed between 2010 and 2019. We highlight three distinct access-to-care measures (Euclidean distances and road network-based travel times based on county and census tract centroids), showcasing how different calculations impact our modeling results. Our results underscore the importance of understanding the choice of access-to-care metrics in GIS-based research to draw valid conclusions.

Addressing Barriers to APRN Practice: Policy and Regulatory Implications During COVID-19.

Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) play a pivotal role in providing healthcare, including preventive care services, to the public. However, barriers to APRN practice exist that impact the provision of vital healthcare services that APRNs are authorized to provide based on their education, training, licensure, and certification. This article provides an overview of APRN barriers to practice, including in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, and discusses key policy and regulatory implications.

Changes in Telehealth Experienced by Advanced Practice RNs During COVID-19: US Survey Results.

The sudden, expanded need for telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic added to the challenges advanced practice RNs face in the United States. The purposes of this article are to summarize advanced practice RNs' responses about the use of telehealth before and during the pandemic and to analyze free-text comments about how the use of telehealth changed during the pandemic. A 20-item survey was distributed using convenience sampling to advanced practice RNs from June 1 to September 23, 2020. Analyses of descriptive and open text responses related to telehealth were conducted. Most of the respondents did not use telehealth prior to the pandemic (n = 5441 [73%]), but during the pandemic, half used telehealth at least daily (n = 3682 [49%]). The most common barriers related to telehealth were about the difficulty some populations had in accessing the necessary technology. The most common favorable comments cited by respondents were related to some patients' improved access to care. Telehealth use is unlikely to return to prepandemic levels. As a result, considerations of telehealth-related recommendations provided for advanced practice RN education, policy, and practice are encouraged for the purpose of increasing healthcare access.

Inclusive Care Practices and Policies Among Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults.

As the health care and well-being of sexual and gender minority (SGM; i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender or gender non-binary) people in the United States receive federal and local-level attention, SGM older adults and caregivers continue to be left out of important health policy and care conversations. The current article describes policy issues and affirmative strategies related to inclusive care practices among SGM older adults and caregivers. In addition to the broader policies considered related to health and well-being, we include a discussion of local-level policy strategies to mitigate discrimination and promote inclusive care for SGM older adults and caregivers. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(12), 6-15.].

"Was Definitely Different Because They Were Kids": Caring for Patients From a School Shooting.

BACKGROUND: Trauma nurses may experience secondary traumatic stress, compassion fatigue, and burnout as their clinical roles expose them to patients with traumatic injuries. Because traumatic events described as being most stressful for nurses involve sudden death or children and adolescents, multicasualty, school-associated shooting events are likely to be particularly stressful for nurses who care for the affected patients. OBJECTIVE: This research examined the psychosocial effects of caring for patients in an inpatient trauma unit following a multicasualty, school-associated shooting event. METHODS: This research was guided by a qualitative case series approach, a theory of secondary traumatic stress, and the compassion fatigue resilience model. Registered nurses who provided care in the trauma unit of a Level I trauma center to patients who were injured during a multicasualty, school-associated shooting event in the Southeastern United States were invited to participate. RESULTS: The three themes identified by this research were (a) innocence of the patients, (b) trajectories of increased emotions, and (c) processing emotional stressors. Nurses reported the benefits of peer support and provided recommendations to increase the efficacy of formal debriefing sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses value self-care routines and peer support as coping mechanisms to foster well-being following exposure to traumatic events. Hospitals should encourage active participation in timely critical incident stress debriefings and promote the use of employee assistance services to support nursing staff after these events.

Original Research: 'It Would Be Nice to Think We Could Have a Voice': Exploring RN Involvement in Hospital Staffing Policymaking.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patient and nursing outcomes improve when nurses are involved in decision-making practices through shared governance structures. Yet there has been little research investigating how staff nurses are involved in hospital staffing policymaking and how they perceive this process. PURPOSE: The study's primary aims were to increase understanding of staff nurses' perceptions of factors that hinder or support nurse involvement in hospital nurse staffing policymaking and to learn more about how nurses are, or would like to be, so involved. We also collected nurses' work environment and demographic information to further inform our understanding. METHODS: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. Using QuestionPro software, we solicited open-ended responses to semistructured questions to explore the topics of interest. The online form was distributed via social media. Results were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Multiple-choice questions related to demographics and nurse work environments were also included, and these results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-two staff nurses completed the online form between April 5 and May 24, 2021. Identified themes include "We aren't asked": structural barriers to staff nurse involvement; "No one cares": workplace culture barriers to staff nurse involvement; and "'They' versus 'we'": lack of power sharing for staffing decision-making. Participants described feeling powerless with regard to, and having little to no involvement in, hospital staffing policymaking. Yet they also expressed their desire to be engaged in this process and offered suggestions for how nurse involvement in such policymaking could be improved. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide crucial insight into how organizations can address existing structural barriers to nurse involvement, offer more equitable opportunities for nurse involvement, foster more inclusive workplace cultures, and recognize the value of nurse input and autonomy regarding staffing decisions.

Media competencies for nurses: A Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Media raises awareness of important health issues, provides guidance to promote health, and shapes health policies. However, nurses are poorly represented in media. PURPOSE: To propose competencies that can be used to advance nurses' knowledge and skills in using media to advance health. METHODS: A Delphi study design of three successive surveys was employed. The Round 1 survey was sent to 70 nurse media leaders, and 28 (40%) responded. Seventeen respondents (61%) participated in Round 2. The Round 3 survey was not needed. DISCUSSION: These competencies provide direction for academia, healthcare organizations, nursing associations and others who seek to develop the leadership and population health skills of nurses. Ways the competencies can be used are outlined. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need to improve population health outcomes by reducing disparities and promoting equity in health and health care. Media engagmeent is an importnat strategy for promoting population health. Additionally, promotion of better media representation of nurses and improved media engagement by nurses and nursing organizations all speak to the importance of advancing media competence.

Breaking Down Institutional Barriers to Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Practice.

Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) significantly contribute to health promotion, disease prevention, and disease management. Yet, barriers to APRN practice exist, including regulatory, state, and institutional barriers, that hinder their ability to practice to the full extent of their education, licensure, and certification. Nurse leaders can play an important role in helping reduce unnecessary institutional barriers to APRN practice.

Results of a National Survey: Ongoing Barriers to APRN Practice in the United States.

Limited information is available on the barriers to practice for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) among states with full, restricted, and reduced practice. The purpose of this study is to identify practice barriers in relationship to United States (U.S.) state practice authority, APRN type, area of practice (rural, suburban, urban), and nature of practice (outpatient, inpatient, and both). An electronic survey of a convenience sample of APRNs was conducted to assess barriers to practice. Identified barriers were examined based on state practice environment, APRN role, practice setting, and location. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis for qualitative data and descriptive analysis for quantitative data. Over 7,000 APRNs representing all 50 states participated. Themes that were identified and reported by respondents, included licensure and administrative barriers, therapy restrictions, physician signature requirements, a lack of collegiality, prescribing barriers, uneven reimbursement, physician only procedures, and telehealth issues. Barriers were identified in all states, regardless of the type of practice authority. All four APRN role types identified practice barriers, some of which were more frequent for some roles than others. Restrictions for home health approval and the requirement for a physician signature for durable medical supply orders were identified by over 40% of respondents practicing in rural areas. Barriers to APRN practice continue to restrict aspects of patient care and patient access to care, even in states with full practice authority. Continued efforts to reduce barriers to APRN practice are needed to ensure patient access to care, especially in rural areas.

COVID-19 effects on practice: Perspectives of Tennessee APRNs.

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Tennessee's Governor issued executive orders temporarily suspending certain practice restrictions on advanced practice registered nurses (APRN), which expired after 2 months as the pandemic worsened. PURPOSE: This purpose of this qualitative study was to analyze APRN interview data to evaluate how prepandemic APRN practice barriers, executive orders, and the pandemic affected APRN practice in Tennessee. METHODS: Fifteen Tennessee APRNs who completed the National APRN Practice and Pandemic study also completed follow-up interviews via a HIPAA-compliant Zoom platform. Given the unprecedented circumstances associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study seeking descriptions and unique perspectives of Tennessee APRNs. Consistent with qualitative study design, we conducted an atheoretical study that featured interviews, purposeful sampling with maximum variation sampling, and content analysis. RESULTS: The major themes were practice changes, impact of executive orders, and ongoing care barriers. The data revealed that patients, APRNs, and other health care providers were strained in new and profound ways during the pandemic. An underlying theme was Tennessee APRNs' frustration with continued regulatory and other practice barriers despite their state's health and health care disparities and under resourced health care system. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate the need to improve care access and health outcomes, advocate for full practice authority for APRNs, support telehealth expansion, address transportation deficiencies, and respond to the pandemic-precipitated mental health crisis.

COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Challenges: Patients and Providers.

Interviews with 15 Tennessee Advanced Practice Registered Nurses early in the COVID-19 pandemic revealed a major theme of mental health challenges unrelated to the primary study purpose. Without direct prompts, 13 out of 15 interviewees mentioned mental health issues among patients and 14 of the 15 interviewees discussed provider mental health problems. A secondary analysis of interview transcripts revealed three themes associated with mental health challenges: general barriers to mental health care, patient-specific concerns, and provider issues. Responding to the new and worsening mental health and substance use disorders revealed by informants and cited in the literature is an urgent priority.

Minding the Gaps: Health Care Access for Foreign-born People in the U.S.: An Integrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Foreign-born people encounter disproportionate health care access barriers compared with U.S.-born adults. Few studies in the past decade have examined how characteristics of foreign-born people influence access to health care. METHODS: An integrative review regarding health care access for foreign-born people was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's framework. Andersen's behavioral model of health care utilization was used to explain the findings. We searched electronic databases and identified 33 peerreviewed papers for inclusion. RESULTS: The reviewed articles represented a broad spectrum of research evaluating health care access. Barriers to health care access for foreign-born people are multifactorial and driven by insurance status, citizenship, immigration status, and English language proficiency. CONCLUSION: Future research must comprehensively examine the unmet health needs and predictors of access among foreign-born people.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on APRN practice: Results from a national survey.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) practice is not well known. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe state practice barriers and explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on APRN practice. METHODS: A descriptive study design used a 20-item web-based survey open from June 1 through September 23, 2020. FINDINGS: A total of 7,467 APRNs responded from all 50 states, including nurse practitioners (n = 6,478, 86.8%), certified registered nurse anesthetists (n = 592, 7.9%), certified nurse-midwives (n = 278, 3.7%), and clinical nurse specialists (n = 242, 3.2%). A number of barriers to practice prior to the pandemic were identified. Most respondents (n = 6334, 84.8%) identified that practice barriers limited the ability of APRNs to provide care during the pandemic. DISCUSSION: Barriers to APRN practice continue to restrict aspects of patient care and patient access to care, even in states with Full Practice Authority (FPA), during the COVID-19 pandemic and with state executive orders waiving practice restrictions. The study findings can be used to advocate for policy changes to support APRN practice authority.

Nurse staffing legislation: Empirical evidence and policy analysis.

Unsafe nurse staffing conditions in hospitals have been shown to increase the risk of adverse patient events, including mortality. Consequently, United States and international professional nursing organizations often advocate for safer staffing conditions. There are a variety of factors to consider when staffing nurses for patient safety, such as the number of patients per nurse, nurse preparation, patient acuity, and nurse autonomy. The complex issue of staffing nurses often is compounded by cost issues and can become politicized. When nurse organizations' recommendations for safe staffing measures are disregarded by hospital administrations, nurse lobbyists and interest groups often pursue legislative action to protect patients and nurses from unsafe staffing conditions. This article presents a narrative review of safe nurse staffing factors and an analysis of nurse staffing legislation. Using a patient-centric lens, three state-level nurse staffing policies (mandated nurse-to-patient ratios, public reporting of staffing plans, and nurse staffing committees) were evaluated by empirical evidence, cost to hospitals and state governments, political feasibility, and potential to affect patient populations. Although nurse staffing policy analysis can be conducted in several ways, it is crucial that nurses consider empirical evidence related to staffing policies as well as evaluations of implemented policies and political influences.

The Politics of Health Care.

What can we expect from the Biden administration?