ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of kindergarten teachers' ratings of pupils for later first-grade academic achievement. Kindergarten students were rated by their teachers on a variety of variables, including math and reading performance, teacher concerns, and amount of learning relative to peers. These variables were then analyzed with respect to outcome measures for math and reading ability administered in the first grade. The teachers' ratings of academic performance were significantly correlated with scores on the outcome measures. Analyses were also carried out to determine sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the different teacher ratings. The results indicated high overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for the ratings. Positive predictive value tended to be lower. A recommendation to follow from these results is that teacher ratings of this sort be used to determine which children should receive cognitive screening measures to further enhance identification of children at risk for learning disability. However, this recommendation is limited by the lack of empirically supported screening measures for math disability versus well-supported screening tools for reading disability.
Subject(s)
Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Underachievement , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child Behavior Disorders/psychology , Child, Preschool , Dyslexia/diagnosis , Dyslexia/psychology , Female , Humans , Learning Disabilities/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mathematics , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reading , Reproducibility of Results , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
This study was designed to examine the effect of the fragile X premutation (pM) on cognitive function and behavior. Participants included 14 children (7 males, 7 females) with the fragile X pM and 14 children without the fragile X pM (and without the fragile X full mutation [fM]), each of whom was matched by age and gender with one of the participants from the pM group. The children ranged in age from 3 years, 1 month, to 17 years, 11 months. Participants were individually administered measures of intellectual functioning, academic achievement, and visual motor integration. Parent rating scales of problem behaviors were completed. Group differences were examined using nonparametric statistics. No statistically significant differences were found between the premutation and nonpremutation groups. The results from this study are consistent with the hypothesis that the premutation does not, in general, have an effect on a child's development. However, this does not preclude cases where specific factors may lead to a specific phenotype.
Subject(s)
Child Behavior Disorders/genetics , Fragile X Syndrome/genetics , Learning Disabilities/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins , Trinucleotide Repeats , Adolescent , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child Behavior Disorders/psychology , Child, Preschool , Female , Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein , Fragile X Syndrome/diagnosis , Fragile X Syndrome/psychology , Humans , Intelligence Tests , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Learning Disabilities/psychology , Male , Mutation , Personality Assessment , PhenotypeABSTRACT
We examined the prevalence of the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) full mutation and fragile X E mutation (FMR2) among preschoolers evaluated for language delay. A total of 534 preschoolers recruited from a Developmental Pediatric or Speech and Language Disorders clinic were tested with Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction DNA analyses; 3 were found to have the FMR1 full mutation. None of the 534 children tested positive for the FMR2 full mutation; however, 3 children had unusually small FMR2 alleles suggestive of FMR2 deletions. Screening for fragile X among language-delayed preschoolers is warranted, particularly when there is a family history of mental retardation, but regardless of sex or the presence of behavioral or physical features associated with the fragile X phenotype. The potential benefit of screening for FMR2 alterations is an unexpected implication of the study and is worthy of continued exploration.
