Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients: results of the SpideRX arm of the carotid revascularization with ev3 arterial technology evolution trial.

PURPOSE: A prospective nonrandomized multicenter registry of 160 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted during the 3-month period from March to May 2005. METHODS: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was performed with the SpideRX™ Embolic Protection System (ev3, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) as part of an investigational device exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The primary end-point of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after CAS was observed in nine patients (5.6%), including death in four patients (2.5%), nonfatal stroke in five patients (3.1%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in one patient (0.6%). A secondary end-point of technical success (defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis <50%) was achieved in 156 of 160 patients (97.5%). The only independent predictor of death or stroke at 30 days was baseline stenosis severity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CAS with distal embolic protection using the SpideRX™ Embolic Protection System is a reasonable alternative for revascularization of some high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis.

Carotid artery revascularisation in high-surgical-risk patients with the NexStent and the FilterWire EX/EZ: 3-year results from the CABERNET trial.

AIMS: To investigate long-term outcomes achieved in high-surgical-risk patients and other clinically-relevant subgroups after carotid stenting with the NexStent and Filterwire EX/EZ devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: CABERNET, a prospective, multicentre, single-arm trial, enrolled 454 patients with extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis (symptomatic > or =50%, n=110; asymptomatic > or =60%, n=344). Early outcomes at one year have been reported. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates were: 7.2%, all stroke; 2.8%, major stroke; 4.8%, ipsilateral stroke; 17.7%, all death; 7.1%, myocardial infarction; 4.4%, target vessel revascularisation. Asymptomatic patients had significantly fewer major strokes than symptomatic patients (1.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.03) and patients <80 years had significantly fewer ipsilateral strokes than those > or =80 years (3.2% vs. 10.7%, P=0.002). Stroke outcomes did not differ significantly between patients with anatomical risk factors compared with those with comorbid medical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes achieved in high-surgical-risk patients with the NexStent and Filterwire EX/EZ devices are favourable. Outcomes may be better in asymptomatic patients or those younger than 80 years of age. These data will be helpful in estimating short-term risks of carotid stenting and balancing these risks against the long-term benefit of stroke prevention.

Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial.

OBJECTIVE: The multicenter ARMOUR (ProximAl PRotection with the MO.MA Device DUring CaRotid Stenting) trial evaluated the 30-day safety and effectiveness of the MO.MA Proximal Cerebral Protection Device (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) utilized to treat high surgical risk patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: Distal embolic protection devices (EPD) have been traditionally utilized during CAS. The MO.MA device acts as a balloon occlusion "endovascular clamping" system to achieve cerebral protection prior to crossing the carotid stenosis. METHODS: This prospective registry enrolled 262 subjects, 37 roll-in and 225 pivotal subjects evaluated with intention to treat (ITT) from September 2007 to February 2009. Subjects underwent CAS using the MO.MA device. The primary endpoint, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death through 30 days (30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) was compared to a performance goal of 13% derived from trials utilizing distal EPD. RESULTS: For the ITT population, the mean age was 74.7 years with 66.7% of the cohort being male. Symptomatic patients comprised 15.1% and 28.9% were octogenarians. Device success was 98.2% and procedural success was 93.2%. The 30-day MACCE rate was 2.7% [95% CI (1.0-5.8%)] with a 30-day major stroke rate of 0.9%. No symptomatic patient suffered a stroke during this trial. CONCLUSIONS: The ARMOUR trial demonstrated that the MO.MA(R) Proximal Cerebral Protection Device is safe and effective for high surgical risk patients undergoing CAS. The absence of stroke in symptomatic patients is the lowest rate reported in any independently adjudicated prospective multicenter registry trial to date.

Carotid artery stenting in high surgical risk patients using the FiberNet embolic protection system: the EPIC trial results.

OBJECTIVE: The multicenter EPIC (FiberNet Embolic Protection System in Carotid Artery Stenting Trial) single-arm trial evaluated the 30-day outcomes of a new design concept for embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: Embolic protection filters available for use during CAS include fixed and over-the-wire systems that rely on embolic material capture within a "basket" structure. The FiberNet Embolic Protection System (EPS), which features a very low crossing profile, consists of a three-dimensional fiber-based filter distally mounted on a 0.014 inch guidewire with integrated aspiration during filter retrieval. METHODS: The trial enrolled 237 patients from 26 centers. Demographics, clinical and lesion characteristics, as well as adverse events through a 30-day follow-up were recorded. The mean age of the patients was 74 years, 64% were male and 20% had symptomatic carotid artery disease. RESULTS: The combined major adverse event (MAE) rate at 30 days for all death, stroke, and myocardial infarction was 3.0%. There were three major strokes (two ischemic and one hemorrhagic) and two minor strokes (both ischemic) for a 2.1% 30-day stroke rate. The procedural technical success rate was 97.5% and macroscopic evidence of debris was reported in 90.9% of the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The FiberNet EPS, used with commercially available stents, produced low stroke rates following CAS in high surgical risk patients presenting with carotid artery disease. The unique filter design including aspiration during retrieval may have contributed to the low 30-day stroke rate reported during CAS in patients considered at high risk for complications following carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial.

OBJECTIVE: The multicenter, single-arm CABERNET trial evaluated outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the NexStent plus FilterWire EX/EZ Emboli Protection System. BACKGROUND: For patients at high surgical risk, carotid artery stenting (CAS) offers a less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: The trial enrolled 454 high-surgical-risk patients with carotid stenosis by angiography > or = 50% for symptomatic patients and > or = 60% for asymptomatic patients. The comparator primary endpoint was the 1-year major adverse event (MAE, defined as any death, stroke, or myocardial infarction [MI]) rate. It was compared with a proportionally weighted objective performance criterion (OPC) of 12.1% representative of published CEA results in similar patients plus a prespecified noninferiority margin (delta) of 4%. A second primary endpoint was the composite rate of 30-day MAE plus late (31-365 days) ipsilateral stroke. RESULTS: Symptoms of carotid stenosis were present in 24.2% of patients; 36.6% of patients were considered high-surgical-risk due to comorbid risk factors and 63.4% due to anatomic risk factors. The rate of 30-day MAE plus late ipsilateral stroke was 4.7% (20/438). The comparator primary endpoint of 1-year MAE was 11.6% (51/438) and was noninferior to the OPC of 12.1% (95% upper confidence interval of 14.5% versus OPC plus delta of 16.1%, P = 0.005). Late ipsilateral stroke was 0.7% and target vessel revascularization at 1 year was 2.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The CABERNET trial demonstrates that CAS with NexStent and FilterWire is noninferior to (equivalent or better than) traditional CEA at 1 year in high-surgical-risk patients based on historical controls.

Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of carotid artery stenting with a unique distal embolic protection system in high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis. BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that some patients with carotid stenosis and serious comorbid conditions are at high risk for carotid endarterectomy, and may be safely treated by carotid artery stenting. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized multicenter registry of 419 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted between April 2004 and October 2004. Carotid artery stenting was performed with the Protégé Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent and the SPIDER Embolic Protection System (ev3 Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota). Aspirin and clopidogrel were prescribed at least 24 h before and three months after revascularization. The primary outcome was the combined incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after intervention, including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. A secondary outcome was the technical success, defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis <50%. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 408 of 419 patients (97.4%). The primary end point was observed in 26 patients (6.2%), including death in 8 (1.9%), nonfatal stroke in 14 (3.3%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in 4 (1%). Independent predictors of death or stroke at 30 days included duration of filter deployment, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and baseline renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: For some patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection is a reasonable alternative for revascularization.