Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pain ; 18(10): 1501-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24842773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Based upon studies using mechanical pin-prick, pressure, electrical or heat stimuli applied to painful and/or pain-free parts of the body, chronic low back pain (CLBP) has been shown to be associated with generalized and enhanced pain sensitivity and altered brain responses to noxious stimuli. To date, no study examined the processing of noxious laser heat pulses, which are known to selectively excite thermal nociceptors located in the superficial skin layers, in CLBP. METHODS: We studied laser heat pain thresholds (LHPTs) and nociceptive laser-evoked brain electrical potentials (LEPs) following skin stimulation of the pain-affected back and the pain-free abdomen using noxious laser heat stimulation in 16 CLBP patients and 16 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs). RESULTS: We observed no statistically significant differences in LHPTs between CLBP patients and HCs, neither on the back nor on the abdomen. Furthermore, we found no evidence for altered brain responses between CLBP patients and HCs in response to stimulation of the back and abdomen in single-trial latencies and amplitudes of LEP components (N2, P2). CONCLUSION: The results are in contrast to previous studies showing hypersensitivity to different experimental noxious stimuli (e.g., contact heat). We argue that these discrepancies may be due to low spatial and temporal summation within the central nervous system following laser heat stimulation. Our results indicate important methodological differences between laser heat and thermode stimulation that should be taken into account when interpreting results, such as from thermal quantitative sensory testing.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Hot Temperature , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Lasers, Solid-State , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Pain/complications , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Low Back Pain/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement
2.
Schmerz ; 25(2): 199-204, 206, 2011 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21424336

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine postural control in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNRS). Furthermore the influence of visual information (eyes open versus eyes closed) was analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 8 patients with CNRS and 12 healthy control subjects were examined. Surface electromyography (SEMG) recordings were made from 5 trunk and 5 lower limb muscles as well as one hip muscle during application of distal lateral perturbation. RESULTS: Healthy controls (mean ± standard deviation: 96.42±64.77 µV) showed a significantly higher maximum amplitude of the gluteus medius muscle in comparison to patients with CNRS (56.29±39.63 µV). Furthermore activation of several lower limb muscles was found to be dependent on visual information. CONCLUSION: Patients showed an altered reflex response of the gluteus medius muscle which could be associated with reduced hip stability.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/physiopathology , Hip/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Postural Balance/physiology , Posture/physiology , Adult , Buttocks , Electromyography , Female , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Quadriceps Muscle/physiopathology , Reference Values , Reflex, Stretch/physiology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...