[Personal Factors of the Bio-Psycho-Social Model (WHO): A Revised Classification by the German Society for Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP)]. / Personbezogene Faktoren im bio-psycho-sozialen Modell der WHO: Systematik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sozialmedizin und Prävention (DGSMP).

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the ICF working group of Faculty II "Applied Social Medicine and Rehabilitation" of the German Society for Social Medicine and Prevention, DGSMP proposed a classification of personal factors (PF) for the German-speaking area. Meanwhile, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and WHO's bio-psycho-social model were increasingly integrated into the German Social Code (Book IX for Rehabilitation and Participation). It was a legislative decision that the needs assessment for the rehabilitation process must be "comprehensive". AIM: This publication aims to present an updated classification of PF to support the socio-medical assessment. For this purpose other published papers proposing a classification of PF were analyzed, especially the publication of Geyh et al. METHODS: The multiprofessional working group re-examined the basic structure, consistency and selection of factors of the 2010 classification using a qualitative approach and modified them if meaningful and necessary. The principles for the selection of factors were the same as in the 2010 publication (comprehensive, manageable, universal, impartial, relevant, unambiguous, focusing on finality, not regarding causality and non-discriminatory). RESULTS: A fundamental revision was not necessary; the basic structure remained primarily unchanged. Some items were included, excluded, summarized, shifted and editorially or content-related altered. Legal expertise shows that the classification of PF and their individual use for the socio-medical assessment, if necessary for the individual rehabilitation allocation, incur no problems with regard to data-protection regulations. PERSPECTIVES: The revised classification is ready to support users to describe and document relevant influences of the life background of individuals in a structured manner. Thus, influences on functioning and participation can be described comprehensively and transparently based on the bio-psycho-social model. A justiciable allocation of benefits for persons with disabilities is facilitated.

[Participation as Target of Social Medicine and Nursing Care: - Legal Definition of Long-Term Care Dependency - Strategies to Prevent Long-Term Care Dependency]. / Teilhabe als Ziel von Sozialmedizin und Pflege: ­ Definition von Pflegebedürftigkeit ­ Prävention von Pflegebedürftigkeit.

Objective: By the "Second Bill to Strengthen Long-Term Care", a new concept of long-term care dependency will be introduced, valid from 2017. Long-term care dependency according to Social Code XI will be defined covering more aspects than today. Therefore, the working group "Nursing Care" of the division "Social Medicine in Practice and Rehabilitation" in the German Society for Social Medicine and Prevention presents their results after working on the social medicine perspective of the definition and prevention of long-term care dependency. Methods: Both the definition and strategies to prevent long-term care dependency are systematically taken into consideration from the point of view of social medicine on the basis of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), as long-term care dependency means a defined condition of disability. Results: Both the current and the new concept of long-term care dependency focus activity limitations. The perspective of social medicine considers the interactions of health condition, its effects on daily activities and personal as well as environmental factors. From this point of view approaches for social benefits concerning prevention and rehabilitation can be identified systematically so as to work against the development and progression of long-term care dependency. The reference to the ICF can facilitate the communication between different professions. The new "graduation" of long-term care dependency would allow an international "translation" referring to the ICF. Conclusion: Experts from the field of social medicine as well as those of nursing care, care-givers and nursing researchers have in common the objective that persons in need of nursing care can participate in as many aspects of life of importance to them in an autonomous and self-determined way. The point of view of social medicine on long-term care dependency is fundamental for all occupational groups that are involved and for their successful cooperation.

Physicians' Self-Conceptions of Their Expertise in Statutory Health Insurance and Social Security Systems.

Medical experts who practice social medicine have a strong ethical approach for their professional positions. Their reports must reflect an objective, independent, high-quality assessment of interactions between health status and the disability of individuals. However, they must simultaneously consider the societal involvement of these individuals when determining the framework of the Statutory Health Insurance and Social Security Systems. Their task is to recommend sociomedical benefits that are tailored to suit personal needs and that respect the individual life situations of the persons involved, thus complementing the efforts of healthcare professionals in clinical settings. The editorial describes the self-conception of this medical specialty on behalf of the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP). Policy makers in social insurances and social security systems generally must respect independent sociomedical recommendations as a crucial point for further realistic development activities.

[Why does evidence-based medicine need the international classification of functioning, disability, and health?]. / Wozu braucht evidenzbasierte Medizin die ICF, die Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit?

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) aims at finding the currently best answer to the questions raised by a patient's disease through rationally comparing different diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives. THESIS: As a rational method, EBM also needs a rational reference system. ICF, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, officially translated into German in 2004, is such a reference system. DISCUSSION OF THE POSSIBLE ROLE OF THE ICF IN EBM: ICF, a supplementary classification to ICD, consists of the four components: body functions and body structures, activities and participation, environmental factors, and personal factors (not yet classified). ICF describes the interdependence between all the factors influencing health as well as disease. For EBM, ICF can serve as a reference system: when defining a therapy's goal and examining whether it was reached, for including and excluding criteria of target groups, checking whether control and intervention groups are comparable, finding out relevant prognostic factors, defining the requirement of an intervention, applying assessments, or grouping people with similar need of help for payment.