ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the respective diagnostic accuracies of the different breast imaging modalities, i. e., mammography (Mx), high-frequency breast ultrasound (US), and dynamic contrast-enhanced breast (MRI) regarding the early diagnosis of familial (hereditary) breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized controlled clinical multi-center trial is performed at 4 academic tertiary care centers in Germany (Ulm, Munchen/Grosshadern, Munster and Bonn) for a total period of 4 years, sponsored by the German Cancer Aid. The protocol consists of semiannual clinical visits and breast ultrasound, and annual bilateral two-view Mx, US and MRI. Imaging studies were first analyzed independently, then Mx was read in conjunction with US, followed by Mx combined with MRI, and finally, all three imaging modalities were read in synopsis. We present the concept and first results of this trial. RESULTS: So far, 748 screening rounds are available for analysis in 613 women. A total of 12 breast cancers have been identified, with 11/12 cases in the pTis or pT1/N0 stage. The mean size of detected invasive cancers was 7 mm. A total of 19 benign lesions were biopsied due to false-positive imaging diagnoses. The breast cancer detection rates were: Mx: 5/12 (42 %), US 3/12 (25 %), MRI 10/12 (83 %), and the positive predictive values: Mx 5/17 (29 %), US 3/15 (30 %), and MRI 10/23 (43 %). CONCLUSION: The preliminary data suggest that early diagnosis of familial breast cancer is feasible by intensified surveillance, in particular with the addition of MRI.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mammography , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Adult , Biopsy , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , False Positive Reactions , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Germany , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mediastinal lymph node staging is essential to determine treatment options in patients with NSCLC. Positron emission tomography (PET) detects increased glucose uptake in malignant tissue using the glucose analogue 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study were evaluated 155 patients with focal pulmonary tumors who underwent both preoperative computed tomography (CT) and FDG-PET scanning (116 malignant and 39 benign lesions). RESULTS: Findings in 155 patients included 116 malignant and 39 benign lesions. For N-staging, FDG-PET showed a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 91%, and an accuracy of 89%. Corresponding figures for CT were 77%, 76%, and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is an effective, noninvasive method for staging thoracic lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer and is superior to CT scanning in the assessment of hilar and mediastinal nodal metastases. With regard to operability, FDG-PET could differentiate reliable between patients with N1/N2 disease and those with unresectable N3 disease.
