Lifestyle practices that reduce seasonal PM2.5 exposure and their impact on COPD.

Particulate matter (PM) is a major air pollutant that has led to global health concerns and can cause and exacerbate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We asked patients with COPD to complete a detailed questionnaire about their lifestyle practices to reduce PM2.5 exposure and analyzed the relationship between ambient PM2.5 concentrations and lifestyle practices. We prospectively enrolled 104 COPD patients from four hospitals in different areas of Korea. They completed detailed questionnaires twice (at enrollment and the end of the study) and Internet of Things-based sensors were installed in their homes to continuously measure PM2.5 for 1 year. The relationship between PM2.5 concentrations, lifestyle practices, and COPD exacerbations were analyzed in each season. The PM2.5 concentration was higher outdoors than indoors in all seasons except summer, and the difference was largest in winter. The six lifestyle practices that significantly lowered the annual indoor PM2.5 concentration compared with the outdoors. The higher the economic status and educational level of patients, the lower the indoor PM2.5 concentration. Some lifestyle practices were associated with reduced small airway resistance, presented as R5-R20 determined by impulse oscillometry, and scores of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Some lifestyle practices are associated with reduced indoor PM2.5 concentrations and can even affect clinical outcomes, including small airway resistance and quality of life of COPD patients.

The impact of ambient air pollution on lung function and respiratory symptoms in elite athletes.

BACKGROUND: Air pollution has become a significant public health concern. During exercise, many physiological factors are thought to increase the effects of air pollution. Air pollution most affects lung function and respiratory symptoms. We investigated the association between lung function, respiratory symptoms, and air pollutant concentration with meteorological factors in elite sports athletes. METHODS: A total of 59 elite sports athletes from the Korea National Sports University participated in this prospective, observational study from September 2019 to June 2020. At ten visits, lung function and respiratory symptoms were obtained after a training session. We measured six air pollutants, including SO2, CO, O3, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5, and two meteorological factors, including humidity and temperature. Air pollutants and meteorological factors were measured by two nearest depositories of the national air pollution information system in Korea. RESULTS: In a single-pollutant model, PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and CO were inversely associated with both FEV1 and FEV6, 10 µg/m3 in PM2.5 was associated with a 32.31 mL decrease in FEV1 and a 36.93 mL decrease in FEV6. Meanwhile, O3 and temperature had positive associations with both FEV1 (13.00 and 3.15 mL) and FEV6 (16.91 and 4.76 mL) and humidity with FEV6 (11.98 mL). In the multi-pollutant model at lag 0, FEV1 was associated negatively with O3 and NO2 (-50.68 and -6.87 mL) and positively with SO2 and temperature (65.76 and 8.08 mL). In the multi-pollutant model at lag 6, temperature was associated with FEV1 and FEV6 (6.01 and 8.89 mL). PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and temperature were significantly associated with FEV1 and FEV6 through lag 0-6. CONCLUSIONS: Air pollutants and meteorological factors are associated with lung function and respiratory symptoms and have cumulative effects among elite athletes. In the multi-pollutant model, temperature has the most significant effect on lung function.

The impact of life behavior and environment on particulate matter in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: The effect of exposure to particulate matter (PM) on human health is a global public health concern. To develop an effective strategy to reduce PM exposure, we performed detailed questionnaire surveys regarding the type of lifestyle required to avoid PM exposure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We correlated the data with real-time PM concentration during the winter season. METHODS: We enrolled 104 patients with COPD aged 40 years or older. Detailed questionnaire surveys were conducted among participants, and internet of things-based sensors were installed at their homes to measure the indoor PM2.5 concentration, which was continuously monitored between December 2019 and February 2020. The associations among PM2.5 concentration, patients' lifestyles, and the impact of both concentration and lifestyle on COPD exacerbation were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean outdoor PM2.5 concentration was higher than mean indoor PM2.5 concentration during the study period (21.28 ± 5.09 µg/m3 vs. 12.75 ± 7.64 µg/m3), with a mean difference of 8.53 ± 7.99 µg/m3. Among the various social factors and practices that aim to avoid exposure to PM, six practices and economic statuses were confirmed to reduce indoor PM2.5 concentration compared to outdoor concentration; Contrarily, these practices created a significant difference between the outdoor and indoor PM2.5 concentrations. The six practice items that showed a significant difference were 1) checking air quality forecast (the difference: -13.31 ± 1.35 µg/m3, p = 0.013), 2) indoor air filter operated (-15.43 ± 1.32 µg/m3, p < 0.001), 3) ventilating home by opening the windows (-13.14 ± 1.28 µg/m3, p = 0.013), 4) checking filters of the air filter (-13.95 ± 1.50 µg/m3, p = 0.002), 5) refraining from going out when outside PM is high (-12.52 ± 1.37 µg/m3, p = 0.039), 6) wearing a mask when going out (-13.38 ± 1.32 µg/m3, p = 0.017). The higher the household income and economic level, the more significant the difference in the PM2.5 concentration. Severe exacerbation was more prevalent among patients with acute exacerbation as the exposure time of PM2.5≥35 µg/m3 or PM2.5≥75 µg/m3. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle and economic levels can affect the indoor PM2.5 concentration, which may impact COPD exacerbation.

Effects of Particulate Respirator Use on Cardiopulmonary Function in Elderly Women: a Quasi-Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: Individual particulate respirator use may offer protection against exposure to particulate matter < 2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5). Among elderly Korean women, we explored individual particulate respirator use and cardiopulmonary function. METHODS: Recruited in Seoul, Korea, 21 elderly, non-smoking women wore particulate respirators for six consecutive days (exlcuding time spent eating, sleeping, and bathing). We measured resting blood pressure before, during, and after respirator use and recorded systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, pulse pressure, and lung function. We also measured 12-hour ambulatory blood pressure at the end of the 6-day long experiment and control periods. Additionally, we examined physiological stress (heart rate variability and urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine) while wearing the particulate respirators. Person- and exposure-level covariates were also considered in the model. RESULTS: After the 6-day period of respirator use, resting blood pressure was reduced by 5.3 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (P = 0.013), 2.9 mmHg for mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.079), and 3.6 mmHg for pulse pressure (P = 0.024). However, particulate respirator use was associated with changes in physiological stress markers. A parasympathetic activity marker (high frequency) significantly decreased by 24.0% (P = 0.029), whereas a sympathetic activity marker (ratio of low-to-high frequency) increased by 50.3% (P = 0.045). An oxidative stress marker, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, increased by 3.4 ng/mg creatinine (P = 0.021) during the experimental period compared with that during the control period. Lung function indices indicated that wearing particulate respirators was protective; however, statistical significance was not confirmed. CONCLUSION: Individual particulate respirator use may prevent PM2.5-induced blood-pressure elevation among elderly Korean women. However, the effects of particulate respirator use, including physiological stress marker elevation, should also be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003526.