Family history in patients who would have been candidates for active surveillance.

INTRODUCTION It is unknown whether a family history of prostate cancer confers additional risk among men who are candidates for active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) (2010- 2018), candidates for AS were identified according to the expanded criteria. Pathological upgrading was defined as a pathologic Gleason score (pGS) of 3+4 or higher for patients with a biopsy GS of 3+3 and a pGS of 4+3 or higher for patients with a biopsy GS of 3+4. Major upgrading was defined as a pGS of 4+4 or higher. The ₓ2 test was used for comparisons. RESULTS: Of 1,320 men who were candidates for AS, 288 (21.8%) had a family history of prostate cancer. There were no differences in terms of the age, number of positive cores, or number of patients with a GS of 7 between the two groups. Pathological upgrading was observed in 61.1% of the total cohort, with no difference observed between the two groups (60.7% versus 62.5%; p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: In men who are eligible for AS according to the expanded criteria, a family history of prostate cancer does not appear to be associated with adverse pathology at RP.

Stepwise Description and Outcomes of Bladder Neck Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy.

Background: To present a stepwise description and outcomes of bladder neck sparing (BNS) robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). Methods: Between March 2015 and December 2018, 30 consecutive patients with benign prostate hyperplasia underwent BNS RASP. Baseline characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative variables were retrospectively abstracted. Descriptive statistics were used to report the variables. Results: The median age was 66.5 (59.3-72.3) years, and median body mass index was 27.6 (24.5-72.3) kg/m2. The median preoperative International Prostate Symptoms Score was 23 (17.5-27), and median prostate size was 97 (74-148.75) mL. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) operative time was 107.5 (22.2) minutes, and the mean (SD) estimated blood loss was 132.4 (35.4) mL. All cases were completed robotically without any intraoperative complications, and continuous bladder irrigation was not necessary for any patient postoperatively. All patients were able to void after catheter removal except one patient with a preexisting diagnosis of neurogenic bladder who resumed clean intermittent catheterization. All patients were continent as defined as using 0 pads postoperatively. Of the 19 patients who had antegrade ejaculation before the operation, 8 patients (42%) reported of continued antegrade ejaculation after the operation. Conclusions: In this report, we demonstrate a simplified approach of BNS RASP that is reproducible with a favorable perioperative complication rates and acceptable postoperative functional outcomes. This technique obviates the need for continuous bladder irrigation and intraperitoneal drain.