Athletes with inguinal disruption benefit from endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair.

PURPOSE: Inguinal disruption, a common condition in athletes, is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair in athletes with inguinal disruption, selected through a multidisciplinary, systematic work-up. METHODS: An observational, prospective cohort study was conducted in 32 athletes with inguinal disruption. Athletes were assessed by a sports medicine physician, radiologist and hernia surgeon and underwent subsequent endoscopic TEP repair with placement of polypropylene mesh. The primary outcome was pain reduction during exercise on the numeric rating scale (NRS) 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were sports resumption, physical functioning and long-term pain intensity. Patients were assessed preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively and after a median follow-up of 19 months. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in 30 patients (94%). The median pain score decreased from 8 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-8] preoperatively to 2 (IQR 0-5) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). At long-term follow-up, the median pain score was 0 (IQR 0-3) (p < 0.001). At 3 months, 60% of patients were able to complete a full training and match. The median intensity of sport was 50% (IQR 20-70) preoperatively, 95% (IQR 70-100) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001), and 100% (IQR 90-100) at long-term follow-up (p < 0.001). The median frequency of sport was 4 (IQR 3-5) times per week before development of symptoms and 3 (IQR 3-4) times per week 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.025). Three months postoperatively, improvement was shown on all physical functioning subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with inguinal disruption, selected through a multidisciplinary, systematic work-up, benefit from TEP repair.

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair for inguinal disruption (Sportsman's hernia): rationale and design of a prospective observational cohort study (TEP-ID-study).

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inguinal pain is a frequently occurring problem in athletes. A diagnosis of inguinal disruption is performed by exclusion of other conditions causing groin pain. Up to now, conservative medical management is considered to be the primary treatment for this condition. Relevant large and prospective clinical studies regarding the treatment of inguinal disruption are limited; however, recent studies have shown the benefits of the totally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) technique.This study provides a complete assessment of the inguinal area in athletes with chronic inguinal pain before and after treatment with the TEP hernia repair technique. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe the rationale and design of an observational cohort study for surgical treatment with the endoscopic TEP hernia repair technique in athletes with a painful groin (inguinal disruption).The study is being conducted in a high-volume, single centre hospital with specialty in TEP hernia repair. Patients over 18 years, suffering from inguinal pain for at least 3 months during or after playing sports, and whom have not undergone previous inguinal surgery and have received no benefit from physiotherapy are eligible for inclusion. Patients with any another cause of inguinal pain, proven by physical examination, inguinal ultrasound, X-pelvis/hip or MRI are excluded.Primary outcome is reduction in pain after 3 months. Secondary outcomes are pain reduction, physical functioning, and resumption of sport (in frequency and intensity). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: An unrestricted research grant for general study purposes was assigned to the Hernia Centre. This study itself is not directly subject to the above mentioned research grant or any other financial sponsorship. We intend to publish the outcome of the study, regardless of the findings. All authors will give final approval of the manuscript version to be published.

Chronic pain after TEP inguinal hernia repair, does MRI reveal a cause?

PURPOSE: Persistent pain is a known side effect after TEP inguinal repair disabling 2-5% of patients. A standardized diagnostic work-up so far is not available. MRI is a diagnostic tool in the work-up of inguinal hernias. In the present study the yield of MRI in evaluating chronic pain after TEP hernia repair is addressed. METHODS: In our database patients receiving an MRI scan for groin pain lasting more than 3 months after TEP inguinal hernia repair were identified. A checklist with potential pathologic findings was filled out for each groin by two blinded observers. Findings in painful, pain-free and unoperated groins were compared and statistical analysis done based upon their relative incidences. Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated to determine interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Imaging studies of 53 patients revealed information regarding 106 groins. Fifty-five groins were painful after the initial operation, 12 were pain-free postoperatively and 39 groins were not operated. None of the predefined disorders was observed statistically more often in the patients with painful groins. Only fibrosis appeared more prevalent in patients with chronic pain (P = 0.11). Interobserver agreement was excellent for identifying the mesh (κ = 0.88) and observing bulging or a hernia (κ = 0.74) and was substantial for detecting fibrosis (κ = 0.63). In 40% of the patients, MRI showed a correct mesh position and observed nothing else than minor fibrosis. A wait and see policy resolved complaints in the majority of the patients. In 15 % of the patients, MRI revealed treatable findings explanatory for persisting groin pain. CONCLUSION: For patients with post-TEP hernia groin pain, MRI is useful to confirm a correct flat mesh position and to identify possible not operation-related causes of groin pain. It is of little help to identify a specific cause of groin repair-related pain.

Fate of renal allografts connected to vascular prostheses.

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of renal transplantation with an arterial anastomosis to a vascular prosthesis in the aortofemoral tract is evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 7 Dutch transplant centers were invited to review their experience. Among a total of 5791 cadaveric renal transplantations performed between 1978 and 1994, 13 cases (0.2%) in 3 different centres were identified. In 6 cases the vascular reconstruction and transplant operation were performed simultaneously, and in 7 cases separately, with a mean interval of 3.5 yr. The indications for vascular reconstruction were aneurysmal disease in 4 and obstructive disease in 9 cases. RESULTS: The early vascular complications of these procedures were hemorrhage in 4 and renal vein thrombosis in 1 and led to graft loss in 3 cases. The perioperative mortality was 2/13 (15%). The graft and patient survival were 68 and 83% respectively after 1 yr and 17 and 37% after 5 yr. Late mortality was mainly due to cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation with an arterial anastomosis to a vascular prosthesis in the aortofemoral tract is a hazardous procedure with relatively poor short- and long-term results. These observations should be considered in the choice of renal replacement therapy in this special patient population.