Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 16(4): 726-730, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930110

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the organs at risk (OARs) doses for lung tumors in gated radiotherapy (RT) compared to conventional RT using the four-dimensional extended cardiac-torso (4D-XCAT) digital phantom in a simulation study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D-XCAT digital phantom was used to create 32 digital phantom datasets of different tumor diameters of 3 and 4 cm, and motion ranges (MRs) of 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 cm and each tumor was placed in four different lung locations (right lower lobe, right upper lobe, left lower lobe, and left upper lobe). XCAT raw binary images were converted to the digital imaging and communication in medicine format using an in-house MATLAB-based program and were imported to treatment planning system (TPS). For each dataset, gated and conventional treatment plans were prepared using Planning Computerized RadioTherapy-three dimensional (PCRT-3D) TPS with superposition computational algorithm. Dose differences between gated and conventional plans were evaluated and compared (as a function of 3D motion and tumor volume and its location) with respect to the dose-volume histograms of different organs-at-risk. RESULTS: There are statistically significant differences in dosimetric parameters among gated and conventional RT, especially for the tumors near the diaphragm (P < 0.05). The maximum reduction in the mean dose of the lung, heart, and liver were 6.11 Gy, 1.51 Gy, and 10.49 Gy, respectively, using gated RT. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric comparison between gated and conventional RT showed that gated RT provides relevant dosimetric improvements to lung normal tissue and the other OARs, especially for the tumors near the diaphragm. In addition, dosimetric differences between gated and conventional RT did generally increase with increasing tumor motion and decreasing tumor volume.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography/methods , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Organs at Risk/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Respiratory Mechanics , Tumor Burden/radiation effects
2.
Comput Biol Med ; 97: 21-29, 2018 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29684782

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to investigate normal lung tissue complication probability in gated and conventional radiotherapy (RT) as a function of diaphragm motion, lesion size, and its location using 4D-XCAT digital phantom in a simulation study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different time series of 3D-CT images were generated using the 4D-XCAT digital phantom. The binary data obtained from this phantom were then converted to the digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) format using an in-house MATLAB-based program to be compatible with our treatment planning system (TPS). The 3D-TPS with superposition computational algorithm was used to generate conventional and gated plans. Treatment plans were generated for 36 different XCAT phantom configurations. These included four diaphragm motions of 20, 25, 30 and 35 mm, three lesion sizes of 3, 4, and 5 cm in diameter and each tumor was placed in four different lung locations (right lower lobe, right upper lobe, left lower lobe and left upper lobe). The complication of normal lung tissue was assessed in terms of mean lung dose (MLD), the lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: The results showed that the gated RT yields superior outcomes in terms of normal tissue complication compared to the conventional RT. For all cases, the gated radiation therapy technique reduced the mean dose, V20, and NTCP of lung tissue by up to 5.53 Gy, 13.38%, and 23.89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the gated RT provides significant advantages in terms of the normal lung tissue complication, compared to the conventional RT, especially for the lesions near the diaphragm.


Subject(s)
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Movement , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Respiration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...