Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Euro Surveill ; 20(16)2015 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25953272

ABSTRACT

In accordance with the goal of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Italian national measles and rubella elimination plan aims to reduce the incidence of congenital rubella cases to less than one case per 100,000 live births by the end of 2015. We report national surveillance data for congenital rubella and rubella in pregnancy from 2005 to 2013. A total of 75 congenital rubella infections were reported; the national annual mean incidence was 1.5/100,000 live births, including probable and confirmed cases according to European Union case definition. Two peaks occurred in 2008 and 2012 (5.0 and 3.6/100,000 respectively). Overall, 160 rubella infections in pregnancy were reported; 69/148 women were multiparous and 38/126 had had a rubella antibody test before pregnancy. Among reported cases, there were 62 infected newborns, 31 voluntary abortions, one stillbirth and one spontaneous abortion. A total of 24 newborns were unclassified and 14 women were lost to follow-up, so underestimation is likely. To improve follow-up of cases, systematic procedures for monitoring infected mothers and children were introduced in 2013. To prevent congenital rubella, antibody screening before pregnancy and vaccination of susceptible women, including post-partum and post-abortum vaccination, should be promoted. Population coverage of two doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccination of ≥ 95% should be maintained and knowledge of health professionals improved.


Subject(s)
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/epidemiology , Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/prevention & control , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Adult , Child, Preschool , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Health Policy , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles Vaccine/immunology , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Public Health , Rubella/classification , Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
2.
Euro Surveill ; 15(49)2010 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21163178

ABSTRACT

In Italy, the arrival of the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus triggered an integrated response that was mainly based on the 2006 National Pandemic Preparedness and Response Plan. In this article we analyse the main activities implemented for epidemiological surveillance, containment and mitigation of the pandemic influenza and the lesson learned from this experience. Overall, from week 31 (27 July ­ 2 August) of 2009 to week 17 (26 April ­ 2 May) of 2010, we estimate that there were approximately 5,600,000 cases of influenza-like illness (ILI) who received medical attention (with almost 2,000 laboratory-confirmed cases of pandemic influenza from May to October 2009). A total of 1,106 confirmed cases were admitted to hospital for serious conditions, of whom 532 were admitted to intensive care units. There were 260 reported deaths due to pandemic influenza. Approximately 870,000 first doses of the pandemic vaccine were administered, representing a vaccine coverage of 4% of the target population. One of the possible reasons for the low uptake of the pandemic vaccine in the target population could be the communication strategy adopted, for both the general population and healthcare workers, which turned out to be a major challenge. Active involvement of all health professionals (at local, regional and national level) in influenza pandemic preparedness and response should be encouraged in the future.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Mass Vaccination/organization & administration , Pandemics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Communication , Disaster Planning , Female , Health Education , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Seasons , Sentinel Surveillance , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
3.
Ann Ig ; 19(6): 509-17, 2007.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18376571

ABSTRACT

To assess the availability of laboratory tools for microbiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection, a survey was conducted on a sample of Italian hospital laboratories during the period April-July 2005. Overall, 261 hospitals, one third of the total Italian hospitals, were randomly selected. All these laboratories were sent a standardized questionnaire collecting information on diagnostic tools available for testing a list of bacterial, viral and fungal organisms responsible for lower respiratory tract infections. Forty eight percent of the sample completed and returned the questionnaire. A part from few pathogens such as Enterobacteria, Enterococcus Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Herpes simplex e Candida spp, for which no differences in diagnostic capacity among hospitals was found, for all the other pathogens considered, significant differences among geographical areas were found.


Subject(s)
Bronchitis/diagnosis , Bronchitis/microbiology , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Microbiological Techniques/instrumentation , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/microbiology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Health Surveys , Hospitals/standards , Humans , Italy , Microbiological Techniques/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...