ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic-related foot condition is one of the most debilitating complications with a higher rate of failure in limb correction, reconstruction, or salvage surgery. Amputation is the final option after other surgical treatments have failed. Major amputation increases energy consumption, resulting in high dependency, decreased mobility, and poor prognosis. Consequently, minor amputation is preferred to resolve these problems but elevated wound complications leading to inadequate prosthesis fit, became a detriment to minor amputation. Strict selection of patients is crucial to ensure success and good functional outcomes as demonstrated in this retrospective study of this case series. Methods: This case series included six patients who underwent Pirogoff amputation with the modification described by Nather and reported the procedure's outcome. The inclusion criteria for subjects were the presence of palpable posterior tibial artery (PTA) or at least biphasic Doppler signal and ankle-brachial systolic index (ABSI) more than 0.70. Other demographic data as well as hematological, inflammatory, and biochemical parameters that may affect wound healing such as Hb, HbA1c, ESR, CRP, WBC, and albumin were recorded as well. The rate and time for wound healing and bone union, presence of complications, and final ambulatory status of patients were determined as the outcome of this study. RESULTS: All of the patients had diabetic foot infections involving only the forefoot region with the presence of either palpable PTA or biphasic Doppler signal. Although the majority of the cases had deranged blood parameters, soft tissue and bone healing were achieved at variable times. Four had good outcomes as they were able to ambulate. One case was complicated with chronic wound dehiscence and another one had Pirogoff stump infection and required transtibial amputation. CONCLUSION: With strict selection criteria, Pirogoff amputation may provide a good functional outcome with a lesser degree of complications compared to major amputation.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: There is limited data on the relative effectiveness of different techniques used for administering genicular nerve block (GNB) for pain management of chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the Malaysian population. This study aims to determine and compare the effectiveness of GNB administered using two pain management techniques?"anatomical landmark-guided (ALG) and ultrasound-guided (USG)?"for chronic knee OA in this population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 40 patients with chronic knee OA who received GNB, 20 of whom underwent treatment with the USG technique and the other 20 with the ALG technique. Pain, stiffness, and functional limitation scores were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Questionnaire (WOMAC) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) at baseline and post-treatment day one, three weeks, and six weeks. Results: Both groups reported a significant reduction in WOMAC and NRS-11 scores as per their feedback on day one, three weeks, and six weeks post-treatment. Greater reductions in WOMAC and NRS-11 scores were reported by patients who received GNB via USG than by ALG technique, the difference achieving statistical significance at six weeks after treatment (p =0.026). Conclusions: GNB administration using USG and ALG techniques are both effective in significantly reducing pain, stiffness, and functional limitation in patients suffering from chronic knee OA. Among the two techniques, USG appears to be more effective. Nevertheless, GNB guided by ALG continues to be a viable treatment modality, especially in healthcare settings with limited to no USG facilities.
