The Impact of the Donor Card Holder Prioritization Program on Kidney Allocation in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Since 2014, as part of a priority program within the Israeli Transplant Law, additional points were given to waitlisted candidates with donor cards. We assessed the impact on deceased donor kidney allocation. METHODS: This study enrolled all patients older than 18 y who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation (January 2016-December 2019). Data were obtained from the National HLA Tissue Laboratory registry at the Sheba Medical Center. Patients were grouped by donor card status (ADI group) (not signed, 0 points; relative signed, 0.1 points; patient signed, 2 points; and relative donated, 9 points). The primary outcome was waiting time until kidney transplantation with and without the additional score. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-four patients underwent kidney transplantation during the study period: 281 (63%) were donor card holders (DCH) and 163 (37%) were not DCH. DCH with extra points waited 68.0 (±47.0) mo on average, compared with 94.6 (±47.3) mo for not DCH ( P  < 0.001). Donor card signers had a shorter time until transplant in a multivariable model. Without extra points, 145 recipients (32.6%) would have missed organs allocated to higher-scored candidates. Allocation changes occurred in 1 patient because of an additional 0.1 points, in 103 candidates because of an additional 2 points, and in 41 candidates because of an additional 9 points. CONCLUSIONS: Additional DCH scores improved allocation and reduced waiting time for donor card signers and those with donating relatives. To enhance fairness, consideration should be given to reducing the score weight of this social criterion and raising scores for other factors, especially dialysis duration.

[SURGICAL TREATMENT USING ROBOTIC APPROACH FOR OBSTRUCTED DEFECATION SYNDROME (ODS)].

INTRODUCTION: Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) is a complex surgical condition which involves structural and functional problems which significantly affects quality of life. There is limited information about the Da-Vinci Robotic System use in the treatment of this condition. This study examines the outcomes of robotic-assisted rectopexy. The primary outcome is recovery from surgery, with secondary outcomes including post-surgical complications, length of hospital stay, rehospitalization rate and recurrence after surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data for patients who underwent robotic assisted surgery for ODS between 2011-2022. A colorectal surgeon performed all surgeries at the Sheba Medical Center using the Da Vinci™ robotic system. This analysis uses descriptive statistics and presents the results as medians and ranges. RESULTS: Out of 33 patients included, 26 (84.9%) were female. Median age was 67 years (Range:19-85 years). Median American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2 (1-3). Median Charlson's comorbidity score was 3 (0-4). Median patients' Body Mass Index (BMI) was 23.2 (15.6-33.4) kg/m2. Eight patients (24.4%) underwent previous procedure for ODS. Most (23) patients included (69.7%) underwent robotic assisted ventral rectopexy. Other interventions included combined anterior and posterior rectopexy (9.1%), combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy (12.1%) and posterior rectopexy (9.1%). No cases of conversion to laparoscopic /open techniques were recorded. Median operation time was 135 minutes (70-270). One intra-operative complication recorded was an injury to the rectum during anterior dissection (3%). No significant blood loss was recorded. A total of 27 patients (81.8%) were operated using the Da Vinci Si system, and the rest (6) using the 6 Da Vinci Xi system. Two patients had post-operative complications. Median length of stay (LOS) was 4 days (2-6 days). Readmission rate within 30 days was 9.1%. Two patients (6.1%) had recurrence of rectal prolapse. Median follow-up was 60 (4-116) months. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome is safe, with fast recovery of the patient and it is efficient during long-term follow-up.

Gastric Bypass as a Third Bariatric Procedure-Our Experience with 42 Cases.

BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon to encounter patients seeking a third, fourth, or even fifth bariatric procedure. With higher expected complication rates and questionable patient benefit, the indication for multiple revisions is still in doubt. To evaluate the perioperative and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing gastric bypass after two previous bariatric surgeries or more. METHODS: We identified all patients that underwent gastric bypass following at least 2 previous bariatric surgeries. We looked at patient demographics, previous bariatric surgeries, pre-operative body mass index (BMI) and obesity-related co-morbidities, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), re-admissions and re-operations, percentage of excess weight loss, and resolution or improvement in comorbidities. RESULTS: Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, the majority being females (31, 73.8%). Average age was 45.6 years (range 27-62), average weight and BMI was 116 kg (range 75-175 kg) and 41.1 kg/m2 (range 25.6-58.7 kg/m2), respectively. Thirty-two patients had two previous bariatric surgeries (73.8%), and 10 patients had 3 former bariatric surgeries (23.8%), and for one patient, this was the fifth bariatric procedure (2.4%). Mean LOS was 10 days (range 2-56 days). Eight patients (19%) needed re-admission and 5 (11.9%) needed re-operation. At a median follow up of 48 months (range 7-99 months), the average BMI was 34.5 kg/m2 (range 23.7-55.1 kg/m2) reflecting an excess BMI loss of 43.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric bypass as a third or more bariatric procedure is effective yet associated with high complication rates, re-admissions, and re-operations.