Clinical-benefit response in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre prospective randomised phase III study of single agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin-vindesine.

BACKGROUND: The modest improvement in median survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by cisplatin-based chemotherapy has led to the current opinion that clinical benefit for the patient is at least as important an end-point as objective response rate (ORR) or survival. Clinical benefit response was the primary end-point of this prospective randomised trial in symptomatic, advanced stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, comparing single agent gemcitabine (GEM) to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either GEM (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15) or cisplatin (100 mg/M2, day 1) plus Vindesine (3 mg/m2, days 1 and 15) (PV), both every four weeks. Clinical benefit was measured by a simple metric based on changes in a visual analogue symptom score list, the Karnofsky performance status and the weight. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomised (84 GEM, 85 PV). Prognostic factors and baseline symptoms were well balanced between the two arms. Most of the the objective responders and about half of the patients with disease stabilisation experienced clinical benefit. Compared to PV, a significantly larger number of GEM-treated patients experienced a clinical benefit (48.1 vs. 28.9%, P = 0.03) that lasted significantly longer (median duration 16 vs. 10 weeks, P = 0.01). No important differences in ORR, time-to-progression or median survival were observed. Grade 3 + 4 toxicity was significantly higher in the PV-group for leukopenia (P = 0.0003), neutropenia (P < 0.0001), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.0006), alopecia (P < 0.0001), and neurotoxicity (P = 0.04). Some severe pulmonary toxicity to GEM was noted. CONCLUSION: Comparison of GEM with cisplatin-based therapy in symptomatic, advanced NSCLC demonstrates that GEM produces significantly a stronger and longer-lasting clinical benefit, probably due to its equal effectiveness in terms of ORR, time-to-progression or survival, combined with significantly less severe therapy-related toxicity.

Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of computed tomography-(CT) scan and the radiolabeled glucose analog 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) visually correlated with CT (PET + CT) in the locoregional lymph node (LN) staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with potentially operable NSCLC underwent thoracic CT, PET, and invasive surgical staging (ISS). Imaging studies were read prospectively and blinded to the surgical and pathologic data. A five-point visual scale was used for the interpretation of LNs on PET. Afterwards, with knowledge of the pathology, the relationship between standardized uptake values (SUVs) and the presence of metastasis in LNs was explored in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the likelihood ratios (LRs) for SUVs of LNs were determined. RESULTS: ISS was available for 690 LN stations. CT correctly identified the nodal stage in 40 of 68 patients (59%), with understaging in 12 patients and overstaging in 16 patients. PET + CT was accurate in 59 patients (87%), with understaging in five patients and overstaging in four patients. In the detection of locally advanced disease (N2/N3), the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT were 75%, 63%, and 68%, respectively. For PET + CT, this was 93%, 95%, and 94% (P = .0004). In the ROC curve, the best SUV threshold to distinguish benign from malignant LNs was 4.40. The analysis with this SUV threshold was not superior to the use of a five-point visual scale. The LR of a SUV less than 3.5 in an LN was 0.152; for a SUV between 3.5 and 4.5, it was 3.157; and for a SUV greater than 4.5, it was 253.096. CONCLUSION: PET + CT is significantly more accurate than CT alone in LN staging of NSCLC. A five-point visual scale is as accurate as the use of an SUV threshold for LNs in the distinction between benign and malignant nodes. The very high negative predictive value of mediastinal PET could reduce the need for mediastinal ISS in NSCLC substantially.

Vindesine-ifosfamide-platinum (VIP) induction chemotherapy in surgically staged IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. Leuven Lung Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: In the pioneer data from the Memorial-Sloan-Kettering group, preoperative mitomycin-C-vindesine-platinum (MVP) induction chemotherapy in N2-NSCLC was accompanied with substantial pulmonary toxicity. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of three-drug VIP induction chemotherapy, the pathologic response in resection specimens, the early survival and relapse patterns are examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1995 and March 1997, 39 consecutive patients with pathology proven N2-NSCLC were treated with three cycles of VIP induction, followed by definitive locoregional treatment (resection and mediastinal dissection or radical radiotherapy). Several patients had unfavorable prognostic characteristics with respect to clinical and biological findings, tumor location and bulk of disease. RESULTS: The response rate to chemotherapy was 59% (95% Confidence Interval 34-75). Twenty-three responding patients had radical locoregional treatment: radical radiotherapy in four, resection in 19. Downstaging was present in nine of the 19 resection specimens, with two pathologic complete responses. The median survival time (MST) of all patients is 19 months, with a projected two-year survival of 49%. In patients responsive to chemotherapy who received definitive local treatment, the MST is not yet reached, and the projected two-year survival is 57%. Relapses were mainly distant, with isolated brain relapse as a disturbing finding. The main toxicity's were leukopenia and vomiting, but they were manageable. In contrast with MVP, no severe pulmonary toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: VIP is a suitable induction regimen for N2-NSCLC, demonstrating a good activity and very acceptable toxicity.

Mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective analysis of 50 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of CT, radio-labeled 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) blinded to CT, and FDG-PET visually correlated with CT, in the detection of N2 metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to hypothesize how PET could influence our actual mediastinal staging procedures. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 50 patients with potentially operable NSCLC, thoracic CT, PET, and invasive surgical staging were performed. Blinded prospective interpretation was performed for each test and compared with surgical pathology results. Abnormalities on each of these staging examinations were recorded on a standard MLN map. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting N2 disease of CT was 67%, 59%, and 64%, respectively. Results of PET blinded to CT were significantly better (p=0.004): 67%, 97%, and 88%, respectively. For PET visually correlated with CT, this was 93%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. In 22 patients, both CT and PET were normal, and this was correct in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: PET was significantly more accurate than CT in the MLN staging in NSCLC. Both examinations were complementary, since visual correlation with the anatomic information on CT improved the reader's ability to discriminate between hilar vs subaortic MLN FDG uptake, and between paramediastinal tumor vs tracheobronchial MLN FDG uptake. If the results can be confirmed in larger numbers of patients, PET could reduce the need for invasive surgical staging remarkably.

Survival and prognostic factors in resected N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a study of 140 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group.

BACKGROUND: The selection of stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients for primary surgical treatment remains controversial. METHODS: One hundred forty patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer who eventually proved to have pathologic N2 disease were studied with a univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had a positive mediastinoscopy; the others had a preoperative N0 or N1 stage. Complete resection rate was 80.7%. Five-year survival was 20.8% (95% confidence interval, 17.2% to 24.4%), 32.2% in mediastinoscopy-negative patients. In the univariate analysis, clinical N stage at mediastinoscopy, complete resection, performance status, T stage, number of metastatic levels in adenocarcinoma, and nodal capsule rupture were important factors. In a multivariate model, survival was worse in case of higher T stage (relative risk = 1.43), lower performance status (relative risk = 1.37), involvement of more than one node level (relative risk = 1.68), nonsquamous histology (relative risk = 1.29) and clinical N2 stage (relative risk = 1.43). Long-term survival was unlikely when lactic dehydrogenase or carcinoembryonic antigen levels were elevated. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical N0 or N1 cancer, complete resection resulted in reasonable survival prospects. In patients with N2 disease discovered at mediastinoscopy, surgical treatment was only worthwhile in case of minimal N2. Several unfavorable prognostic factors could be identified in the univariate analysis and confirmed in a multivariate Cox model.