The value of ultrasound guidance during IUD insertion in women with RVF uterus: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective is to evaluate the benefits of using ultrasound guidance during insertion of Intrauterine device IUD in women with retroverted flexed RVF uteri. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial conducted on 400 women with RVF uteri eligible for IUD insertion. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 underwent IUD insertion under ultrasound guidance while in group 2 no ultrasound guidance was used. The primary outcome measure was the(Visual Analogue Scale) VAS pain score reported by the women during insertion. Other outcome included easiness of insertion, the procedure time and occurrence of complications as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, failure of insertion, uterine perforation and bleeding. RESULTS: The VAS pain score was significantly lower (2.36 ± 1.77 vs. 4.74 ± 2.35, p < 0.001), the insertion was much easier (score 4.0 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 1.27, p < 0.001) and the time needed for the procedure was significantly shorter (5.82 ± 2.56 vs. 9.4 ± 4.99 min, p < 0.001) in women within the ultrasound guided group when compared to control group. The total rate of complications was significantly lower (6 vs. 16 %, p 0.001) especially bleeding (2 vs. 9%, p = 0.002), abdominal cramps (10.5 vs. 28 %, p 0.012) and failure of the procedure (0 vs. 3%, p = 005) in ultrasound guided group women when compared to control. CONCLUSION: Insertion of Intrauterine device IUD under ultrasound guidance in women with Retroverted flexed RVF uterus easier and less painful than the blind standard technique.

Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting the outcome of induction of labor (IOL). METHODS: The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Kasr El-Aini Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, between April 1 and July 31, 2017. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was compared. RESULTS: The analysis included 49 women with successful IOL and 21 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 99.5°, a cervical length of less than 34 mm, and a Bishop score of more than five. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 99.5° had the best sensitivity (91.84%), specificity (90.48), positive predictive value (95.7%), negative predictive value (82.6%), positive likelihood ratio (9.64), and negative likelihood ratio (0.09) compared with the other two predictors. CONCLUSION: A PCA of more than 99.5° yielded the best accuracy in predicting successful IOL compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03113227.

Cervical Priming by Vaginal or Oral Misoprostol Before Operative Hysteroscopy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether misoprostol oral is as effective as vaginal tablets for cervical ripening. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial involving a parallel, double-blinded study (Canadian Task Force Classification IB). SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University Hospital, between January 2014 and January 2016. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy for various indications. INTERVENTIONS: At 12 hours before hysteroscopy, the oral group received a 400-µg misoprostol tablet and 2 vaginal starch tablets. The vaginal group received 400 µg of misoprostol and 2 oral starch tablets. The control group received 2 oral starch and 2 vaginal starch tablets as placebo. Preoperative preparation was the same in all patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measures were width of the endocervical canal, ease of dilatation, time to dilatation, and adverse effects. All subjects eligible for operative hysteroscopy (n = 430) were invited to participate. Twenty subjects refused, and 20 subjects were excluded. The enrolled subjects (n = 390) were randomized to oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol, or placebo. The differences in mean width of the endocervical canal between the oral and the control groups (4.79 ± 1.07 mm vs 3.92 ± 0.92 mm), and also between the vaginal and the control groups (4.25 ± 0.71 mm vs 3.92 ± 0.92 mm) were significant (p < .001 for both). Moreover, the difference in mean width of the endocervical canal between the oral and the vaginal groups was significant (4.79 ± 1.07 mm vs 4.25 ± 0.71 mm; p = .009). Cervical entry was easier in the oral and vaginal groups compared with the control group (mean Likert score, 4.25 ± 0.64 vs 4.22 ± 0.74 vs 2.55 ± 0.87; p < .001). In addition, the ease of cervical entry did not differ significantly between the oral and vaginal groups (p = .998). The mean time to dilatation was shorter in the oral group and the vaginal group (compared with the control group (48.98 ± 12.6 seconds vs 46.55 ± 15.32 seconds vs 178.05 ± 74.18 seconds; p < .001), but the difference between the oral and vaginal groups was not significant (p = .987). Adverse effects were comparable between groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of cervical priming between oral misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol.

Antagonist protocol versus clomiphene in unexplained infertility: A randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial study was to compare clinical pregnancy rates and ovulation parameters in female patients of unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) using an antagonist protocol versus a conventional clomiphene citrate protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter parallel randomized controlled, open-label trial. A central randomization center used computer generated tables to allocate treatments. We conducted the study in two centers: Saudi Center and Samir Abbas and Assisted Reproductive Techniques Center of Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt between January 2011 and January 2014. Six hundred and twenty-two couples with unexplained infertility were randomized into two equal groups with 27 excluded after randomization: the antagonist protocol group and the clomiphene group. Antagonist protocol: human menopausal gonadotropins were given to 298 patients from Day 2 to reach a dominant follicle of 18-22 mm, intramuscularly. Then, orgalutrone (0.25 mg) was subcutaneously started from Day 6 or Day 7 until the day of human chorionic gonadotropins (hCG; that was given in the dose of 10,000 IU, intramuscularly) when follicles reached 18-22 mm. Afterward, the IUI of 0.5 mL was done from 34 hours to 36 hours using IUI catheter without guidance of ultrasonography and with an empty urinary bladder. The clomiphene citrate protocol was clomiphene citrate given 100 mg/d to 297 patients from Day 2 to Day 6 and follow up until day of hCG. The clinical pregnancy rate detected with ultrasound confirmed fetal heart pulsations at 6-weeks' gestation (4 weeks after IUI). The number of dominant follicles, level of serum estradiol, and luteinizing hormone at the day of hCG injection and the incidence of twin or triplet pregnancies in both groups were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate in the antagonist protocol group was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than in the clomiphene group. It was 80 patients (27%) in the antagonist protocol group versus 41 patients (14%) in the clomiphene group. The mean number of dominant follicles was significantly (p < 0.001) greater in the antagonist protocol group (4.36 ± 1.36 dominant follicles) compared with the clomiphene group (2.71 ± 0.96 dominant follicles). In addition, the rate of twin pregnancies was 15 cases in the antagonist protocol group versus six cases only in the clomiphene group (p = 0.047). The luteinizing hormone also was significantly lower in the antagonist group (2.1 ± 1.3) compared with that in the clomiphene group (9.5 ± 3.6). CONCLUSION: IUI clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher by antagonist protocol.

Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the new delayed start protocol against the conventional gonadotropin (Gn)-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders (PORs). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 160 women with poor response to previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle were randomized either to start Gn then Cetrotide 0.25 subcutaneously (sc) added when leading follicle (DF) reach >12 mm or Cetrotide 0.25 mg sc started first from day 2 to day 8 then Gn therapy was added and Cetrotide restarted when DF reach >12 mm. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between conventional and delayed start protocols regarding the needed dose of Gn for stimulation (4368 ± 643 and 3798 ± 515), level of estradiol (E2; 778 ± 371 and 1076 ± 453), and endometrial thickness at human chorionic gonadotropin triggering (8.6 ± 1.8 and 9.8 ± 1.9), the number of DF (3.4 ± 1.5 and 4.9 ± 2.1), the number of retrieved follicles (2.4 ± 2.1 and 4.3 ± 2.5), and successful embryo transfer (13 vs 16), respectively (P < .05). There was a highly statistically significant difference between the 2 study groups regarding the number of oocytes fertilized (1.2 ± 2.0 vs 3.3 ± 1.4), metaphase II oocytes (0.9 ± 1.0 vs 2.7 + 1.6), and grade I embryos (0.7 ± 0.9 vs 2.1 + 1.1; P < .001). The chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and abortion rate showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 study groups (P value .003 and .006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Delayed start protocol significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate and IVF cycle parameters in PORs.