SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic retinopathy progression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors affect progression of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) compared to standard of care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared subjects enrolled in a commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database who filled a prescription for a SGLT2 inhibitor between 2013 and 2020 to unexposed controls, matched up to a 1:3 ratio. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled for less than 2 years in the plan, had no prior ophthalmologic exam, had no diagnosis of NPDR, had a diagnosis of diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), had received treatment for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), or were younger than 18 years. To balance covariates of interest between the cohorts, an inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score for SGLT2 inhibitor exposure was used. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) for VTDR, PDR, or DME relative to SGLT2 exposure. RESULTS: A total of 6065 patients who initiated an SGLT2 inhibitor were matched to 12,890 controls. There were 734 (12%), 657 (10.8%), and 72 (1.18%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, in the SGLT2 inhibitor cohort. Conversely, there were 1479 (11.4%), 1331 (10.3%), and 128 (0.99%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, among controls. After IPTW, Cox regression analysis showed no difference in hazard for VTDR, PDR, or DME in the SGLT2 inhibitor-exposed cohort relative to the unexposed group [HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15 for VTDR; HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14 for DME; HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.67 for PDR]. CONCLUSION: Exposure to SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was not associated with progression of NPDR compared to patients receiving other diabetic therapies.

Systemic disease associations with angioid streaks in a large healthcare claims database.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To assess systemic associations of angioid streaks (AS) using a large US healthcare database. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of patients diagnosed with AS in a large, national US insurer from 2000-2019. Cases were matched 1:5 to controls. The prevalence rates of established associated disease states and other systemic diseases were calculated and compared using logistic regression. Additionally, the rate of anti-VEGF treatment was assessed as a proxy for the incidence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred fifty-two cases of AS and 9028 matched controls were included. The rates of association between AS and the well-characterized conditions included: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE)-228 patients (12.3%), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-18 patients (1.0%), Paget's disease-6 patients (0.3%), hemoglobinopathies-30 patients (1.6%), and idiopathic-1573 patients (84.9%). There was a statistically higher prevalence of the following less classically associated diseases among patients with AS compared to controls: hereditary spherocytosis (1.7% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), connective tissue disease (1.0% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001) and non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (33.9% vs 10.6%, p < 0.001). Among 1442 eligible cases analyzed, 427 (29.6%) received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection with 338 (23.4%) patients having the injection after their AS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest collection of AS patients to date, the classical teaching of systemic disease associations occur at rates far, far lower than previously reported. The association of AS with other less reported diseases highlights new potential associations and may contribute to the understanding of AS formation.

Effect of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Drops in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease.

Purpose: Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous preparation that concentrates platelets in a small volume of plasma. The purpose of this study was to determine if PRP eye drops improved the symptoms and signs of ocular surface disease. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted of patients who were prescribed PRP eye drops. Subjects were excluded if they did not have follow-up, underwent intraocular surgery prior to follow-up, received nerve growth factor treatments, or did not have a baseline examination with photography. Symptoms were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Patients also underwent a slit lamp exam, ocular surface staining with fluorescein and lissamine green, and Schirmer testing. Results: The charts of 47 patients treated with PRP drops for ocular surface disease were reviewed. Sixty-four eyes of 32 patients were included in the study who had photographs of lissamine green staining taken at baseline and at follow-up. Thirteen patients (28%) had ocular graft-versus-host disease, 16 patients (34%) had Sjögren's syndrome, and 4 patients (8.5%) had rheumatoid arthritis. There was a statistically significant decrease in OSDI score from baseline to follow-up (39.5 vs 30.8 points, p = 0.02). Among the 64 eyes included, 9 (14%) had an improvement in conjunctival lissamine green staining, while 6 (9%) had an increase in staining at follow-up. Among the 20 eyes with Schirmer testing, there was a borderline significant increase in score from baseline to follow-up (5.9 vs 9.7, p = 0.06). Among the 44 eyes that had corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) reported, 8 (18.2%) had decreased staining and 2 (4.5%) had increased staining at follow-up. Conclusion: Treatment with PRP drops was associated with a significant improvement in symptoms in patients with ocular surface disease. Future larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of PRP drops for treating ocular surface disease.

Evaluation of intravitreal topotecan dose levels, toxicity and efficacy for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: a preclinical and clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Current melphalan-based intravitreal regimens for retinoblastoma (RB) vitreous seeds cause retinal toxicity. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan monotherapy compared with melphalan in our rabbit model and patient cohort. METHODS: Rabbit experiments: empiric pharmacokinetics were determined following topotecan injection. For topotecan (15 µg or 30 µg), melphalan (12.5 µg) or saline, toxicity was evaluated by serial electroretinography (ERG) and histopathology, and efficacy against vitreous seed xenografts was measured by tumour cell reduction and apoptosis induction. PATIENTS: retrospective cohort study of 235 patients receiving 990 intravitreal injections of topotecan or melphalan. RESULTS: Intravitreal topotecan 30 µg (equals 60 µg in humans) achieved the IC90 across the rabbit vitreous. Three weekly topotecan injections (either 15 µg or 30 µg) caused no retinal toxicity in rabbits, whereas melphalan 12.5 µg (equals 25 µg in humans) reduced ERG amplitudes 42%-79%. Intravitreal topotecan 15 µg was equally effective to melphalan to treat WERI-Rb1 cell xenografts in rabbits (96% reduction for topotecan vs saline (p=0.004), 88% reduction for melphalan vs saline (p=0.004), topotecan vs melphalan, p=0.15). In our clinical study, patients received 881 monotherapy injections (48 topotecan, 833 melphalan). Patients receiving 20 µg or 30 µg topotecan demonstrated no significant ERG reductions; melphalan caused ERG reductions of 7.6 µV for every injection of 25 µg (p=0.03) or 30 µg (p<0.001). Most patients treated with intravitreal topotecan also received intravitreal melphalan at some point during their treatment course. Among those eyes treated exclusively with topotecan monotherapy, all eyes were salvaged. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these experiments suggest that intravitreal topotecan monotherapy for the treatment of RB vitreous seeds is non-toxic and effective.

Compound Heterozygous Mutations in ZNF408 in a Patient with a Late Onset Pigmentary Retinopathy and Relatively Preserved Central Retina.

PURPOSE: To describe in detail the phenotype of a patient with compound heterozygous mutations in ZNF408 and an adult-onset pigmentary retinopathy rather than familial exudative vitreoretinopathy as expected with heterozygous mutations in this gene. METHODS: A 70-year-old male presented with a pigmentary retinopathy, which prompted a genetic evaluation that revealed two variants in trans in the ZNF408 gene. He underwent an ophthalmic examination, kinetic fields, electroretinography (ERG), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence, wide-angle fluorescein angiography and near-infrared imaging. RESULTS: Visual acuity was 20/20 for both eyes. Fundus examination showed epiretinal membrane, vascular attenuation and peripheral bone spicule pigmentation in both eyes. Fluorescein angiography showed no vascular anomalies in both eyes. Fundus autofluorescence showed a preserved island of fundus autofluorescence centrally. Visual field by kinetic perimetry (V-4e stimulus) showed generalized constriction to 40 degrees of eccentricity and by an I-4e target showed generalized constriction to 10 degrees of eccentricity. ERG showed detectable but reduced cone-mediated responses. SD-OCT demonstrated preserved outer nuclear layer thickness centrally, which decreased with eccentricity. Static perimetry showed substantial rod and cone sensitivities centrally that declined with eccentricity. A next-generation sequencing panel revealed bi-allelic variants (p.Arg567Ter; c.1699C > T and p.Leu566His; c.1697 T > A) in the ZNF408 gene. CONCLUSIONS: ZNF408-associated retinal dystrophies can present with predominantly retinal findings and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa. Our study revealed a novel variant p.L566H, which to our knowledge has not previously been reported.

Ultra-Widefield Autofluorescence Imaging of Retinal Detachment Compared to Retinoschisis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Localized retinal detachment can appear similar to peripheral retinoschisis (RS) based on clinical exam alone. This study utilized ultra-widefield autofluorescence (UAF) to characterize retinal changes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) compared to RS and to help differentiate these two entities in the era of multimodal imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 282 eyes undergoing diagnostic UAF. Eyes were excluded if the quality of the color photograph or UAF prevented reliable evaluation, or if they contained significant peripheral retinal pathology such as diabetic retinopathy or retinal vein occlusions. Eyes were determined to have RRD or RS based on dilated fundus examination, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography imaging consistent with the diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifty-three eyes were included; 38 had retinal detachment, and 25 had RS. Eyes were determined to be bullous or not from the color photographs. Based on all UAFs reviewed, images were determined to have granular, normal, hypo-, hyper-, or mixed autofluorescence patterns. The posterior border of the RRD and RS was evaluated separately and determined to have hyper-, hypo-, granular, mixed, or normal autofluorescence. Thirty-three eyes with RRD (86.8%) appeared bullous compared to 12 eyes with RS (48%; P = .002). UAF was considered granular in zero (0%) of RRD eyes and one (4%) RS eye, normal in one RRD eye (2.63%) and 17 (68%) RS eyes, hypoautofluorescent in 27 (71.1%) RRD eyes and four (16%) RS eyes, hyperautofluorescent in one (2.63%) RRD eye and one (4%) RS eye, and mixed in nine (4%) RRD eyes and two (8%) RS eyes (P < .001). When evaluating the posterior leading edge on UAF, 84.2% (n = 32) of patients with RRD had a hyperautofluorescent leading edge compared to 25% (n = 6) of patients with RS (P < .001). UAF was homogenous in 65.8% (n = 25) of cases of RRD versus in 92% (n = 23) of cases of RS (P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to utilize UAF imaging to differentiate RRD and RS. Findings suggest there are differences between RRD and RS with regards to UAF, UAF of the posterior border, and homogeneity of the area affected. UAF should be considered in the era of multimodal imaging, particularly when clinical exam alone is inadequate to differentiate these two entities. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:550-556.].