ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of 0.9% bromfenac (Xibrom™) or a celecoxib-impregnated intraocular lens (celecoxib-IOL) compared with 1% prednisolone acetate (PA) in controlling postoperative inflammation and posterior capsule opacification (PCO). ANIMAL STUDIED: Fifty-nine dogs undergoing cataract extraction by phacoemulsification. PROCEDURE: Bilateral patients received bromfenac or celecoxib-IOL plus PA in one eye, and PA in the contralateral eye. Unilateral patients received bromfenac or PA. Complete ophthalmic examination including tonometry, slit-lamp grading of flare and PCO, and digital image acquisition for masked PCO evaluation was performed within 24 h and 1, 4, 12, 24, and 56 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: Celecoxib-IOL/PA-treated eyes had significantly less flare than PA-treated eyes, which had significantly less flare than bromfenac-treated eyes 24 h postoperatively. There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) postoperatively, or at 1, 24, or 56 weeks. Celecoxib-IOL/PA-treated eyes had significantly lower IOP measurements than bromfenac and PA-treated eyes at 4 and 12 weeks. There was no significant difference in PCO level between groups using slit-lamp biomicroscopy at any time point. Masked evaluation of digital images revealed significantly less PCO in celecoxib-IOL/PA- vs. bromfenac-treated eyes at 4 weeks, and in bromfenac- vs. PA-treated eyes at 56 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes receiving celecoxib-IOL/PA had better initial control of inflammation. Bromfenac was equally effective compared with PA in controlling inflammation. There was no association between COX-2 inhibitor administration and ocular hypertension. Celecoxib-IOL/PA-treated eyes showed better initial control of PCO (up to 12 weeks), while eyes receiving bromfenac had better long-term control of PCO (56 weeks).
