Initiation and rapid titration of methadone and slow-release oral morphine (SROM) in an acute care, inpatient setting: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Methadone titration in an outpatient setting typically involves initiation with subtherapeutic doses with slow titration to mitigate the risks of respiratory depression and overdose. In pregnancy, and generally, subtherapeutic doses of methadone and slow titrations are associated with poorer outcomes in terms of treatment retention and ongoing illicit opioid use. We aim to describe rapid titration of OAT in an inpatient setting for pregnant injection opioid users with high opioid tolerance secondary to a fentanyl-based illicit drug supply. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients admitted to a tertiary center with a primary indication of opioid withdrawal and treatment for severe opioid use disorder in pregnancy. RESULTS: Twelve women received rapid methadone titrations with or without slow-release oral morphine for opioid use disorder during a total of fifteen hospital admissions. All women included in the study were active fentanyl users (12/12). Methadone dosing was increased rapidly with no adverse events with a median dose at day 7 of 65 mg (IQR 60-70 mg) and median discharge dose of 85 mg (IQR 70-92.5 mg) during their admission for titration. Slow-release oral morphine was used in half of the titration admissions (8/15) with a median dose of 340 mg (IQR 187.5-425 mg) at discharge. The median length of admission was 12 days (IQR 9.5-15). CONCLUSIONS: A rapid titration of methadone was completed in an inpatient setting with or without slow-release oral morphine, without adverse events showing feasibility of this protocol for a pregnant population in an inpatient setting. Patients achieved therapeutic doses of methadone (and/or SROM) faster than outpatient counterparts with no known adverse events.

A contingency management approach for treatment of methamphetamine use disorder and human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral treatment adherence in pregnancy to prevent mother-to-child transmission: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: This review highlights the rising prevalence of methamphetamine use in pregnancy in North American and the difficulty of managing active human immunodeficiency virus infection in a pregnant woman while actively using methamphetamines. Multidisciplinary medical teams with knowledge of addiction medicine, infectious disease management, and pregnancy are needed to provide combined expert care to reduce the harms associated with substance use and improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment. We report the case of a treatment-naïve pregnant patient with human immunodeficiency virus who was actively using methamphetamines. The patient was able to initiate and adhere to antiretroviral treatment while taking a prescription stimulant in a contingency management paradigm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of prescription stimulants being used in pregnancy to improve adherence to antiretroviral medications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old white woman with untreated human immunodeficiency virus, a newly diagnosed pregnancy, and actively using methamphetamines presented to a drop-in combined prenatal care and addiction medicine clinic. After initiating a prescription amphetamine in a contingency management paradigm, she was adherent to human immunodeficiency antiretroviral treatment and had a fully suppressed viral load throughout the remainder of her pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Active treatment of methamphetamine use disorders with prescription stimulants, coupled with contingency management, may represent a mechanism to engage patients in care and improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment (and prevent mother-to-child-transmission of human immunodeficiency virus).

Use of Injectable Opioid Agonist Therapy in a In-Patient Setting for a Pregnant Patient With Opioid Use Disorder: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: In the era of highly potent illicit opioids, such as fentanyl and carfentanil, injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is an effective treatment for those with severe and treatment-refractory opioid use disorder. Untreated opioid use disorder in pregnancy can lead to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are currently limited reports on the use of iOAT in pregnant women. The in-patient setting may provide an opportunity to pregnant women for stabilization with iOAT where first line therapies have been ineffective. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of a pregnant individual who engaged in daily intravenous fentanyl who was admitted to the hospital at 29 weeks gestation for stabilization with iOAT, methadone, and slow-release oral morphine. Before admission, she endured 6 opioid overdoses in her pregnancy and continued to use illicit intravenous opioids in the community despite high dose methadone combined with slow-release oral morphine. Her withdrawal symptoms and cravings were ameliorated with hydromorphone 90 mg IM/IV BID, methadone 135 mg daily, and morphine sulfate sustained release 600 mg daily. With this regimen, she was able to reduce her intravenous fentanyl use to a single episode during her hospitalization. She completed her pregnancy in hospital, delivering a full-term live infant after receiving comprehensive prenatal care. DISCUSSION: This case report highlights iOAT as an option during pregnancy and describes the in-patient setting as appropriate to retain high-risk patients in care. This approach may benefit those who are refractory to standard opioid agonist treatment, the numbers of whom may be rising as tolerance to the illicit supply increases.

Primary care management of opioid use disorders: Abstinence, methadone, or buprenorphine-naloxone?

OBJECTIVE: To advise physicians on which treatment options to recommend for specific patient populations: abstinence-based treatment, buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance, or methadone maintenance. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: PubMed was searched and literature was reviewed on the effectiveness, safety, and side effect profiles of abstinence-based treatment, buprenorphine-naloxone treatment, and methadone treatment. Both observational and interventional studies were included. MAIN MESSAGE: Both methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone are substantially more effective than abstinence-based treatment. Methadone has higher treatment retention rates than buprenorphine-naloxone does, while buprenorphine-naloxone has a lower risk of overdose. For all patient groups, physicians should recommend methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone treatment over abstinence-based treatment (level I evidence). Methadone is preferred over buprenorphine-naloxone for patients at higher risk of treatment dropout, such as injection opioid users (level I evidence). Youth and pregnant women who inject opioids should also receive methadone first (level III evidence). If buprenorphine-naloxone is prescribed first, the patient should be promptly switched to methadone if withdrawal symptoms, cravings, or opioid use persist despite an optimal buprenorphine-naloxone dose (level II evidence). Buprenorphine-naloxone is recommended for socially stable prescription oral opioid users, particularly if their work or family commitments make it difficult for them to attend the pharmacy daily, if they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring regular primary care (level IV evidence), or if their jobs require higher levels of cognitive functioning or psychomotor performance (level III evidence). Buprenorphine-naloxone is also recommended for patients at high risk of methadone toxicity, such as the elderly, those taking high doses of benzodiazepines or other sedating drugs, heavy drinkers, those with a lower level of opioid tolerance, and those at high risk of prolonged QT interval (level III evidence). CONCLUSION: Individual patient characteristics and preferences should be taken into consideration when choosing a first-line opioid agonist treatment. For patients at high risk of dropout (such as adolescents and socially unstable patients), treatment retention should take precedence over other clinical considerations. For patients with high risk of toxicity (such as patients with heavy alcohol or benzodiazepine use), safety would likely be the first consideration. However, the most important factor to consider is that opioid agonist treatment is far more effective than abstinence-based treatment.

Prise en charge des troubles de consommation d'opioïdes en première ligne: Abstinence, méthadone ou buprénorphine-naloxone?

OBJECTIF: Conseiller les médecins quant aux options thérapeutiques à recommander à des populations précises de patients : approche axée sur l'abstinence, traitement d'entretien par la buprénorphine-naloxone ou traitement d'entretien par la méthadone. SOURCES D'INFORMATION: Une recherche sur PubMed a été effectuée, et on a relevé dans les publications les données sur l'efficacité, l'innocuité et le profil d'effets indésirables de l'approche axée sur l'abstinence, du traitement par la buprénorphine-naloxone et du traitement par la méthadone. Les études d'observation et interventionnelles ont été incluses. MESSAGE PRINCIPAL: La méthadone et la buprénorphine-naloxone sont substantiellement plus efficaces que l'approche axée sur l'abstinence. La méthadone présente un taux de rétention plus élevé que la buprénorphine-naloxone, alors que la buprénorphine-naloxone présente un risque plus faible de surdose. Les médecins devraient recommander le traitement par la méthadone ou la buprénorphine-naloxone plutôt que l'approche axée sur l'abstinence, et ce, à tous les groupes de patients (données de niveau I). La méthadone est préférable à la buprénorphine-naloxone chez les patients qui présentent un risque élevé d'abandon, comme les usagers d'opioïdes par injection (données de niveau I). Les jeunes et les femmes enceintes qui font usage d'opioïdes par injection devraient aussi recevoir la méthadone d'abord (données de niveau III). Si la buprénorphine-naloxone est prescrite en premier, il faut faire passer rapidement le patient à la méthadone si les symptômes de sevrage, les fortes envies ou la consommation d'opioïdes persistent malgré une dose optimale de buprénorphine-naloxone (données de niveau II). La buprénorphine-naloxone est recommandée chez les usagers d'opioïdes sur ordonnance par voie orale socialement stables, surtout s'ils ont un emploi ou si leurs obligations familiales les empêchent de se rendre à la pharmacie tous les jours, s'ils ont une affection médicale ou psychiatrique exigeant des soins réguliers de première ligne (données de niveau IV), ou encore si leur emploi exige une fonction cognitive ou un rendement psychomoteur élevés (données de niveau III). La buprénorphine-naloxone est aussi recommandée chez les patients qui présentent un risque élevé de toxicité à la méthadone, tels que les personnes âgées, les personnes qui prennent de fortes doses de benzodiazépines ou d'autres sédatifs, les gros buveurs, les personnes dont la tolérance aux opioïdes est faible et les personnes à risque de prolongement de l'intervalle QT (données de niveau III). CONCLUSION: Il faut tenir compte des caractéristiques et des préférences individuelles des patients lors de la sélection d'un traitement de première intention par un agoniste des opioïdes. Chez les patients qui présentent un risque élevé d'abandon (adolescents et patients socialement instables), la rétention en traitement doit avoir préséance sur les autres considérations cliniques. Chez les patients qui présentent un risque élevé de toxicité (comme les usagers abusifs d'alcool ou de benzodiazépines), la sécurité a sans doute préséance. Ce qu'il importe le plus de considérer toutefois, c'est que le traitement par un agoniste des opioïdes est beaucoup plus efficace que l'approche axée sur l'abstinence.

Breastfeeding and Opiate Substitution Therapy: Starting to Understand Infant Feeding Choices.

INTRODUCTION: Despite research demonstrating the safety and benefit of breastfeeding in opioid substitution therapy, few women in treatment breastfeed. Understanding the factors contributing to the choices women on opioid substitution therapy make about infant feeding is important. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to better understand and support infant feeding choices and breastfeeding experiences in women on opioid substitution therapy. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on five databases: (1) Ovid MEDLINE(R) without revisions, (2) Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, (3) EMBASE, (4) CINAHL, and (5) FRANCIS. From 1081 articles, 46 articles were reviewed. RESULTS: The literature supports breastfeeding as an appropriate and safe option for women on opioid substitution treatment. Breastfeeding and rooming-in reduce neonatal abstinence. Women face barriers to breastfeeding due to societal stigma and the lack of patient and health-care provider education. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts are needed to increase the knowledge that women and health-care professionals have about the safety and benefits of breastfeeding.