Pregnancy and Covid vaccine trials: Gender justice compromised.

On June 11, 2021, a pregnant woman approached the Delhi High Court seeking vaccination for pregnant women on a priority basis. The petitioner also sought directions to the Union government for setting up of separate vaccination centres for pregnant women who are at high risk, and the creation of a registry for monitoring their medical condition post vaccination (1). The case was a pivotal point in the history of Covid-19 vaccine rollouts in India, because it demanded a clear communication from the Union Government for vaccination of pregnant women. The Union Government's counsel informed the Court that while the Government would consider the May 28 recommendations of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (NTAGI) in favour of vaccinations for all pregnant women based on a risk vs benefit assessment, no timeline was in place for this yet (2). Based on this statement, the Court disposed of the petition, passing no further orders.

Marginalizing health: employing an equity and intersectionality frame / Marginalizando a saúde: empregando uma abordagem de equidade e interseccionalidade

ABSTRACT The understanding that the drivers of inequities are multiple and intersecting is critical for health policy formulation and implementation. An intersectionality analysis reveals these relationships and allows a nuanced grasp of how health inequities are framed and understood. Using global statistics and other examples, the paper argues the significance of an intersectionality analysis in unravelling the disproportionate impact of inequity and the implications for the health and lives of persons experiencing these multiple discriminations. Attention to this, challenges the assumption of homogeneity and helps to visibilize lived realities. A few examples of acts of resistance are cited by the authors that have attempted to amplify the voices and knowledge of those whose realities are otherwise invisibilized by prevailing inequities, policies and discourses. 'Marginalizing' health thus implies an intersectional understanding of inequity as well as challenging and changing prevailing socio-political structures.

RESUMO O entendimento de que os fatores motivadores das desigualdades são múltiplos e se cruzam é fundamental para a formulação e para a implementação de políticas de saúde. Uma análise de interseccionalidade revela essas relações e permite uma compreensão diferenciada de como as iniquidades em saúde são estruturadas e compreendidas. Usando estatísticas globais e outros exemplos, o artigo argumenta a importância de uma análise de interseccionalidade para desvendar o impacto desproporcional da desigualdade e as implicações para a saúde e a vida das pessoas que sofrem essas múltiplas discriminações. Essa abordagem desafia o pressuposto de homogeneidade e ajuda a visibilizar as realidades vividas. Alguns exemplos de atos de resistência são citados pelos autores que tentaram ampliar as vozes e o conhecimento daqueles cujas realidades são, de outro modo, invisibilizadas pelas iniquidades, políticas e discursos predominantes. A 'marginalização' da saúde implica, portanto, um entendimento interseccional da desigualdade, assim como em enfrentar e mudar as estruturas sociopolíticas predominantes.

'Marginalizing' health: employing an equity and intersectionality frame / 'Marginalizando' a saúde: empregando uma abordagem de equidade e interseccionalidade

ABSTRACT The understanding that the drivers of inequities are multiple and intersecting is critical for health policy formulation and implementation. An intersectionality analysis reveals these relationships and allows a nuanced grasp of how health inequities are framed and understood. Using global statistics and other examples, the paper argues the significance of an intersectionality analysis in unravelling the disproportionate impact of inequity and the implications for the health and lives of persons experiencing these multiple discriminations. Attention to this, challenges the assumption of homogeneity and helps to visibilize lived realities. A few examples of acts of resistance are cited by the authors that have attempted to amplify the voices and knowledge of those whose realities are otherwise invisibilized by prevailing inequities, policies and discourses. 'Marginalizing' health thus implies an intersectional understanding of inequity as well as challenging and changing prevailing socio-political structures.

RESUMO O entendimento de que os fatores motivadores das desigualdades são múltiplos e se cruzam é fundamental para a formulação e para a implementação de políticas de saúde. Uma análise de interseccionalidade revela essas relações e permite uma compreensão diferenciada de como as iniquidades em saúde são estruturadas e compreendidas. Usando estatísticas globais e outros exemplos, o artigo argumenta a importância de uma análise de interseccionalidade para desvendar o impacto desproporcional da desigualdade e as implicações para a saúde e a vida das pessoas que sofrem essas múltiplas discriminações. Essa abordagem desafia o pressuposto de homogeneidade e ajuda a visibilizar as realidades vividas. Alguns exemplos de atos de resistência são citados pelos autores que tentaram ampliar as vozes e o conhecimento daqueles cujas realidades são, de outro modo, invisibilizadas pelas iniquidades, políticas e discursos predominantes. A 'marginalização' da saúde implica, portanto, um entendimento interseccional da desigualdade, assim como em enfrentar e mudar as estruturas sociopolíticas predominantes.

An idea whose time has come: Compensation for vaccine-related injuries and death in India.

This paper emphasises the urgent need for a compensation policy for those affected by adverse events following immunisation in India. In the absence of such a mechanism in the country, people claim compensation by taking recourse to tort law and have to face the ensuing uncertainty and challenges with regard to the award of compensation. The paper argues that people should be provided compensation in the event of death and serious adverse events following compulsory immunisation, irrespective of whether there is a causal association between the adverse event and the vaccine, on the basis of no fault compensation.

Vaccine delivery to disease control: a paradigm shift in health policy.

India's Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP) has resulted in the creation of infrastructure, human resources and systems for the procurement and delivery of vaccines. Recently, new vaccines have been added and there are plans for the introduction of more. However, the outcomes in terms of reduction of the diseases for which the vaccines are being administered remain ambiguous. This is evident from the persistent health issues that children continue to experience, despite immunisation. This situation raises a fundamental ethical question for public health: vaccinations are one of the tools of disease control, but are they properly aligned to the control of disease so as to produce the expected public health utility or benefit?

"The invisible": Participant's experiences in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The paper discussing the perspectives of clinical trial participants about the various aspects of CTs is based on the primary research conducted by Sama in 2012-13. METHODOLOGY: In-depth interviews were conducted with 36 CT participants from the states of New Delhi, Gujarat, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. In addition to CT participants, other key informants including investigators, representatives of Contract Research Organizations (CROs), sponsor, Ethics Committee (EC) members etc. were also interviewed to develop a comprehensive understanding of the functioning of the CT sector. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: The paper describes the perspectives of participants on the relevant aspects of recruitment into CTs, reasons for participation in CTs, informed consent, adverse events and compensation. The role played by the push and pull factors in recruitment, the information asymmetry, the power imbalance between the health-care provider and seeker, the role of sociocultural factors, etc., are explored in the paper. Combined with the insights from other stakeholders, the study gives an understanding about the chasm between regulations and realities in the Indian CT sector. Further, the paper briefly explores the recent changes and amendments in the laws governing the CT sector that is aimed at improving the conduct of CTs and uphold the rights of participants. CONCLUSION: Participants are the most important stakeholders in a CT setting. It is imperative that their voices are heard and their rights upheld for the ethical conduct of CTs.