Predictors of mortality among older major trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Older trauma patients have a higher mortality yet are more likely to be under-triaged compared to younger patients. Studies have suggested that current trauma team activation criteria are suboptimal for older patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to describe trauma care delivered, patient outcomes, and to identify variables independently associated with mortality. METHODS: We performed a health records review from 2014 to 2020 of older (age ≥ 65 years) trauma patients presenting to a level one trauma centre with any of the following: injury severity score (ISS) > 12, and all trauma team activations or admission to the trauma ward. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included injury mechanism and trauma care delivered. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. Multiple imputation was used to deal with missing data. RESULTS: We enrolled 1,380 patients (mean age 80 years, mean ISS 18); 26.8% had multimorbidity (≥ 2 chronic conditions) and 65.9% met criteria for polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications). The most common mechanism was fall from standing height (61.1%). Thirty-day all-cause mortality occurred in 239 (17.3%) patients. A Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 15 (odds ratio [OR] = 5.55; 95% CI 3.73-8.24), ISS > 15 (OR = 3.75, 95% CI 2.35-6.01), age ≥ 85 years (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.29-3.22), anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or warfarin (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35) and multimorbidity (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.22) were significantly associated with increased risk 30-day mortality (C-statistic = 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.85). Dementia (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.95) and time to CT scan > 60 min (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) were associated with decreased mortality risk. CONCLUSION: We identified five factors associated with increased 30-day mortality in older trauma patients: GCS < 15, ISS > 15, age ≥ 85 years, anticoagulation, and multimorbidity. These factors should be considered when developing modified trauma team activation criteria for older adults.

ABSTRAIT: CONTEXTE: Les patients traumatisés âgés ont une mortalité plus élevée, mais sont plus susceptibles d'être sous-triés que les patients plus jeunes. Des études ont suggéré que les critères actuels d'activation des équipes de traumatologie sont sous-optimaux pour les patients âgés. OBJECTIFS: L'objectif était de décrire les soins traumatologiques dispensés, les résultats pour les patients et d'identifier les variables associées indépendamment à la mortalité. MéTHODES: De 2014 à 2020, nous avons effectué un examen des dossiers médicaux de patients de plus de 65 ans qui ont subi un traumatisme et qui se sont présentés à un centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 avec l'un ou l'autre des éléments suivants: le score de gravité de la blessure (SSI) > 12, et toutes les activations de l'équipe de traumatologie ou l'admission au service de traumatologie. Le critère de jugement principal était la mortalité toutes causes confondues de 30 jours. Les critères de jugement secondaires comprenaient le mécanisme de blessure et les soins prodigués en cas de traumatisme. La régression logistique multivariée a été utilisée pour identifier les facteurs indépendamment associés à la mortalité toutes causes confondues sur 30 jours. L'imputation multiple a été utilisée pour traiter les données manquantes. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 1380 patients (âge moyen 80 ans, SSI moyenne 18); 26.8% avaient une multimorbidité (2 maladies chroniques) et 65.9% répondaient aux critères de polypharmacie (5 médicaments). Le mécanisme le plus courant était la chute de la hauteur debout (61.1%). Une mortalité toutes causes confondues sur 30 jours est survenue chez 239 (17.3%) patients. Une échelle de coma de Glasgow (GCS) < 15 (rapport de cotes [OR] = 5.55; 95% CI 3.73­8.24), ISS > 15 (OR = 3.75, 95% CI 2.35­6.01), âge 85 ans (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.29­3.22), anticoagulation avec un anticoagulant oral direct (DOAC) ou la warfarine (RC = 1.59, IC à 95%, de 1,08 à 2.35) et la multimorbidité (RC = 1.53, IC à 95%, de 1.06 à 2.22) étaient significativement associées à un risque accru de mortalité à 30 jours (C-statistic = 0.82, IC à 95%, de 0.79 à 0.85). Démence (RC = 0.61, IC à 95%, 0.40 à 0.95) le temps de TDM > 60 min (OR = 0.50, IC à 95%, 0.34 à 0.74) était associé à une diminution du risque de mortalité.

Airway Oscillometry Detects Spirometric-Silent Episodes of Acute Cellular Rejection.

Rationale: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is common during the initial 3 months after lung transplant. Patients are monitored with spirometry and routine surveillance transbronchial biopsies. However, many centers monitor patients with spirometry only because of the risks and insensitivity of transbronchial biopsy for detecting ACR. Airway oscillometry is a lung function test that detects peripheral airway inhomogeneity with greater sensitivity than spirometry. Little is known about the role of oscillometry in patient monitoring after a transplant.Objectives: To characterize oscillometry measurements in biopsy-proven clinically significant (grade ≥2 ACR) in the first 3 months after a transplant.Methods: We enrolled 156 of the 209 double lung transplant recipients between December 2017 and March 2019. Weekly outpatient oscillometry and spirometry and surveillance biopsies at Weeks 6 and 12 were conducted at our center.Measurements and Main Results: Of the 138 patients followed for 3 or more months, 15 patients had 16 episodes of grade 2 ACR (AR2) and 44 patients had 64 episodes of grade 0 ACR (AR0) rejection associated with stable and/or improving spirometry. In 15/16 episodes of AR2, spirometry was stable or improving in the weeks leading to transbronchial biopsy. However, oscillometry was markedly abnormal and significantly different from AR0 (P < 0.05), particularly in integrated area of reactance and the resistance between 5 and 19 Hz, the indices of peripheral airway obstruction. By 2 weeks after biopsy, after treatment for AR2, oscillometry in the AR2 group improved and was similar to the AR0 group.Conclusions: Oscillometry identified physiological changes associated with AR2 that were not discernible by spirometry and is useful for graft monitoring after a lung transplant.

Development of Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for Respiratory Oscillometry in Clinic Studies.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines to conduct and interpret conventional pulmonary function (PFT) tests are frequently reviewed and updated. However, the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) guidelines for respiratory oscillometry testing remain limited. QA/QC guidelines are essential for oscillometry to be used as a diagnostic pulmonary function test (PFT) in a clinical setting. METHODS: We developed a QA/QC protocol shortly after oscillometry was introduced in our laboratory as part of a clinical study. The first clinical study began after the research personnel completed 3 h of combined didactic and hands-on training and establishment of a standard operating protocol (SOP) for oscillometry testing. All oscillometry tests were conducted using the initial SOP protocol from October 17, 2017, to April 6, 2018. At this time, the first QA/QC audit took place, followed by revisions to the SOP, the addition of a QA/QC checklist, and the development of a 12-h training program. A second audit of oscillometry tests was conducted from April 9, 2018, to June 30, 2019. Both audits were completed by a registered cardiopulmonary technologist from the Toronto General Pulmonary Function Lab. RESULTS: The first audit evaluated 197 paired oscillometry-PFT tests and found 10 tests (5.08%) to be invalid, with a coefficient of variation > 15%. The second audit examined 1,930 paired oscillometry-PFT tests; only 3 tests (0.16%) were unacceptable, with a coefficient of variation > 15%. Improvement in QA/QC was significantly better compared to the first audit (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although oscillometry requires minimal subject cooperation, application of the principles that govern the conduct and application of a PFT are important for ensuring that oscillometry testing is performed according to acceptability and reproducibility. Specifically, the inclusion of a SOP, a proper training program, a QA/QC checklist, and regular audits with feedback are vital to ensure that oscillometry is conducted accurately and precisely.