Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Educ Health (Abingdon) ; 35(2): 58-66, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36647933

ABSTRACT

Background: Ambulatory training is an integral component of internal medicine residency programs, yet details regarding operational processes in resident continuity clinics remain limited. Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of medical directors of residency practices between 2015 and 2019 (n = 222) to describe and share operational and scheduling processes in internal medicine resident continuity clinics in the US. Results: Among residency practices, support for the medical director role ranged substantially, but was most commonly reported at 11%-20% full-time-equivalent support. By the end of the survey period, the majority of programs (65.1%) reported obtaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) certification (level 1-3). For new patient appointments, 34.9% of programs reported a 1-7 day wait and 25.8% reported an 8-14 day wait. Wait times for new appointments were generally shorter for PCMH certified practices (P = 0.029). No-show rates were most commonly 26%-50% for new patients and 11%-25% for established patients. Most programs reported that interns see 3-4 patients per ½-day and senior residents see 5-6 patients per ½-day. Most interns and residents maintain a panel size of 51-120 patients. Discussion: Creating high-performing residency clinics requires a focus on core building blocks and operational processes. Based on the survey results and consensus opinion, we provide five summary recommendations related to (1) support for the medical director leadership role, (2) patient-centered and coordinated models of care, (3) support for patient scheduling, (4) recommended visit lengths, and (5) ancillary support, such as social work.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Physician Executives , Humans , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Surveys and Questionnaires , Internal Medicine/education
3.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 26(2): 116-25, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23471925

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Primary care practices are an ideal setting for reducing national smoking rates because >70% of smokers visit their physician annually, yet smoking cessation counseling is inconsistently delivered to patients. We designed and created a novel software program for handheld computers and hypothesized that it would improve clinicians' ability to provide patient-tailored smoking cessation counseling at the point of care. METHODS: A handheld computer software program was created based on smoking cessation guidelines and an adaptation of widely accepted behavioral change theories. The tool was evaluated using a validated before/after survey to measure physician smoking cessation counseling behaviors, knowledge, and comfort/self-efficacy. RESULTS: Participants included 17 physicians (mean age, 41 years; 71% male; 5 resident physicians) from a practice-based research network. After 4 months of use in direct patient care, physicians were more likely to advise patients to stop smoking (P = .049) and reported an increase in use of the "5 As" (P = .03). Improved self-efficacy in counseling patients regarding smoking cessation (P = .006) was seen, as was increased comfort in providing follow-up to patients (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a handheld computer software tool improved smoking cessation counseling among physicians and shows promise for translating evidence about smoking cessation counseling into practice and educational settings.


Subject(s)
Computers, Handheld , Counseling/methods , Smoking Cessation , Adult , Cooperative Behavior , Family Practice , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Physicians, Primary Care , Software , Surveys and Questionnaires , Virginia
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 26(1): 16-20, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20628830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many have called for ambulatory training redesign in internal medicine (IM) residencies to increase primary care career outcomes. Many believe dysfunctional, clinic environments are a key barrier to meaningful ambulatory education, but little is actually known about the educational milieu of continuity clinics nationwide. OBJECTIVE: We wished to describe the infrastructure and educational milieu at resident continuity clinics and assess clinic readiness to meet new IM-RRC requirements. DESIGN: National survey of ACGME accredited IM training programs. PARTICIPANTS: Directors of academic and community-based continuity clinics. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one out of 365 (62%) of clinic directors representing 49% of training programs responded. Wide variation amongst continuity clinics in size, structure and educational organization exist. Clinics below the 25th percentile of total clinic sessions would not meet RRC-IM requirements for total number of clinic sessions. Only two thirds of clinics provided a longitudinal mentor. Forty-three percent of directors reported their trainees felt stressed in the clinic environment and 25% of clinic directors felt overwhelmed. LIMITATIONS: The survey used self reported data and was not anonymous. A slight predominance of larger clinics and university based clinics responded. Data may not reflect changes to programs made since 2008. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey demonstrates that the continuity clinic experience varies widely across IM programs, with many sites not yet meeting new ACGME requirements. The combination of disadvantaged and ill patients with inadequately resourced clinics, stressed residents, and clinic directors suggests that many sites need substantial reorganization and institutional commitment.New paradigms, encouraged by ACGME requirement changes such as increased separation of inpatient and outpatient duties are needed to improve the continuity clinic experience.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Ambulatory Care , Data Collection , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Physician Executives/education , Ambulatory Care/trends , Ambulatory Care Facilities/trends , Data Collection/methods , Education, Medical, Graduate/trends , Humans , Internal Medicine/trends , Internship and Residency/trends , Physician Executives/trends
5.
Acad Med ; 85(12): 1880-7, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20978423

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Residents will most effectively learn about ambulatory, systems-based practice by working in highly functional ambulatory practices; however, systems experiences in ambulatory training are thought to be highly variable. The authors sought to determine the prevalence of functional-practice characteristics at clinics where residents learn. METHOD: In 2007, the authors conducted a national survey of medical directors of resident continuity clinics using a comprehensive, Web-based instrument that included both a residency clinic assessment and a practice system assessment (PSA). The authors designed the PSA to estimate the Physician Practice Connections (PPC) score, indicating the readiness of a practice to function as a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). RESULTS: Of 356 clinic directors or physician representatives responding to an initial inquiry, 221 completed the survey (62%)--representing 185 programs (49% of accredited programs). The majority of clinics were hospital based (139/220; 63%) or hospital supported (41/220; 19%) and were located in urban settings (151/217; 70%). Estimated payer mix categories included Medicare or managed Medicare (169; 29%), Medicaid or managed Medicaid (161; 34%), and self-pay (156; 25%). The mean estimated PPC score was 53 points (of 100; SD = 17.6). Suburban and rural clinics, Veterans Affairs' clinics, federally qualified health centers, and clinics with a higher proportion of patients with commercial insurance or managed Medicare earned higher scores. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of residency clinics have elements needed for PCMH recognition. However, clinics struggled with connecting these elements with coordination-of-care processes, suggesting areas for improvement to support better functioning of ambulatory training practices.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/standards , Specialization , Humans , United States
6.
Acad Med ; 85(8): 1369-77, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20453813

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Health information technology (HIT), particularly electronic health records (EHRs), will become universal in ambulatory practices, but the current roles and functions that HIT and EHRs play in the ambulatory clinic settings of internal medicine (IM) residents are unknown. METHOD: The authors conducted a Web-based survey from July 2007 to January 2008 to ascertain HIT prevalence and functionality. Respondents were directors of one or more ambulatory clinics where IM residents completed any required outpatient training, as identified by directors of accredited U.S. IM residencies. RESULTS: The authors identified 356 clinic directors from 264 accredited U.S. programs (70%); 221 directors (62%) completed the survey, representing 185 accredited programs (49%). According to responding directors, residents in 121 of 216 clinics (56%) had access to EHRs, residents in 147 of 219 clinics (67%) used some type of electronic data system (EDS) to manage patient information, and residents in 62 clinics (28% of 219 responding) used an EDS to generate lists of patients needing follow-up care. Compared with smaller IM training programs, programs with > or =50 trainees were more likely to have an EDS (67% versus 53%, P = .037), electronic prescription writer (57% versus 42%, P = .026), or EHR (63% versus 45%, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Resident ambulatory clinics seem to have greater adoption of HIT and EHRs than practicing physicians' ambulatory offices. Ample room for improvement exists, however, as electronic systems with suboptimal patient data, limited functionality, and reliance on multiple (paper and electronic) systems all hinder residents' ability to perform important care coordination activities.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/statistics & numerical data , Electronic Health Records/standards , Internal Medicine , Humans , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , United States
7.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 20(4): 958-63, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20168009

ABSTRACT

The authors describe Charlottesville Health Access (CHA), an initiative to get people who are homeless into the health care system. A community homeless shelter worked with faculty and students from the Univ. of Virginia Schools of Medicine and Nursing to create and run the program.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Community Networks , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Needs Assessment , Virginia
8.
Acad Med ; 83(11): 1080-7, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18971662

ABSTRACT

Improving patient safety and quality in health care is one of medicine's most pressing challenges. Residency training programs have a unique opportunity to meet this challenge by training physicians in the science and methods of patient safety and quality improvement (QI).With support from the Health Resources and Services Administration, the authors developed an innovative, longitudinal, experiential curriculum in patient safety and QI for internal medicine residents at the University of Virginia. This two-year curriculum teaches the critical concepts and skills of patient safety and QI: systems thinking and human factors analysis, root cause analysis (RCA), and process mapping. Residents apply these skills in a series of QI and patient safety projects. The constructivist educational model creates a learning environment that actively engages residents in improving the quality and safety of their medical practice.Between 2003 and 2005, 38 residents completed RCAs of adverse events. The RCAs identified causes and proposed useful interventions that have produced important care improvements. Qualitative analysis demonstrates that the curriculum shifted residents' thinking about patient safety to a systems-based approach. Residents completed 237 outcome assessments during three years. Results indicate that seminars met predefined learning objectives and were interactive and enjoyable. Residents strongly believe they gained important skills in all domains.The challenge to improve quality and safety in health care requires physicians to learn new knowledge and skills. Graduate medical education can equip new physicians with the skills necessary to lead the movement to safer and better quality of care for all patients.This article is part of a theme issue of Academic Medicine on the Title VII health professions training programs.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Clinical Competence , Competency-Based Education , Education, Medical, Graduate/economics , Humans , Problem-Based Learning , Risk Management , Safety , United States , United States Health Resources and Services Administration/economics , Virginia
9.
J Gen Intern Med ; 23(4): 485-8, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18373150

ABSTRACT

Multiple factors are driving residency programs to explicitly address practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI), yet few information systems exist to facilitate such training. We developed, implemented, and evaluated a Web-based tool that provides Internal Medicine residents at the University of Virginia Health System with population-based reports about their ambulatory clinical experiences. Residents use Systems and Practice Analysis for Resident Competencies (SPARC) to identify potential areas for practice improvement. Thirty-three (65%) of 51 residents completed a survey assessing SPARC's usefulness, with 94% agreeing that it was a useful educational tool. Twenty-six residents (51%) completed a before-after study indicating increased agreement (5-point Likert scale, with 5=strongly agree) with statements regarding confidence in ability to access population-based data about chronic disease management (mean [SD] 2.5 [1.2] vs. 4.5 [0.5], p < .001, sign test) and information comparing their practice style to that of their peers (2.2 [1.2] vs. 4.6 [0.5], p < .001).


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , Internal Medicine , Internet , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Hospital Information Systems , Humans , Internship and Residency , Medical Audit , Professional Competence , Software , Virginia
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 21(5): 486-9, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16704393

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reading habits and educational resources of primary care internal medicine residents for their ambulatory medicine education. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multiprogram survey of primary care internal medicine residents. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Second- and third-year residents on ambulatory care rotations at 9 primary care medicine programs (124 eligible residents; 71% response rate). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants were asked open-ended and 5-point Likert-scaled questions about reading habits: time spent reading, preferred resources, and motivating and inhibiting factors. Participants reported reading medical topics for a mean of 4.3+/-3.0 SD hours weekly. Online-only sources were the most frequently utilized medical resource (mean Likert response 4.16+/-0.87). Respondents most commonly cited specific patients' cases (4.38+/-0.65) and preparation for talks (4.08+/-0.89) as motivating factors, and family responsibilities (3.99+/-0.65) and lack of motivation (3.93+/-0.81) as inhibiting factors. CONCLUSIONS: To stimulate residents' reading, residency programs should encourage patient- and case-based learning; require teaching assignments; and provide easy access to online curricula.


Subject(s)
Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Learning , Primary Health Care , Reading , Ambulatory Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Motivation , Periodicals as Topic , Program Evaluation , United States , Workload
12.
Am J Med Sci ; 330(1): 25-31, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16020996

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the scope and value of services provided by free clinics across the United States. METHODS: Mail survey of directors of free clinics registered in the Free Clinic Directory of the Free Clinic Foundation of America, November 2001, concerning the calendar year 2001. RESULTS: Eighty two percent (281/355) of clinics responded. Seventy five percent of clinics described their target population as the "uninsured" and 23% as "low income". Fifty five percent had income based eligibility criteria of 200% Federal poverty level or less. Clinics provided a mean of 5,989 patient visits/year and 11,202 prescriptions/year to 2,311 unique patients. 61.8% of patients were female, 80.4% between ages 19 to 64, 55.1% white, 21.8% black, and 18.7% Hispanic. Clinics were open 29.7 hours/week, 4.1 days/week, and 32.9% had a licensed pharmacy. The mean annual budget was $458,028 and clinics were staffed by 156.7 volunteers and 6.9 paid employees per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Free clinics have become an established part of the safety net for the uninsured. The differences among the clinics are striking, supporting the conclusion that a variety of approaches to the care of the underserved can be used. However, despite their efforts, the responding free clinics manage to provide care to only 650,000 of the nation's 41 million uninsured.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Budgets , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
13.
Int J Med Inform ; 74(9): 711-7, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15985385

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether physician experience with and attitude towards computers is associated with adoption of a voluntary ambulatory prescription writing expert system. METHODS: A prescription expert system was implemented in an academic internal medicine residency training clinic and physician utilization was tracked electronically. A physician attitude and behavior survey (response rate=89%) was conducted six months after implementation. RESULTS: There was wide variability in system adoption and degree of usage, though 72% of physicians reported predominant usage (> or =50% of prescriptions) of the expert system six months after implementation. Self-reported and measured technology usage were strongly correlated (r=0.70, p<0.0001). Variation in use was strongly associated with physician attitude toward issues of system efficiency and effect on quality, but not with prior computer experience, level of training, or satisfaction with their primary care practice. Non-adopters felt that electronic prescribing was more time consuming and also more likely to believe that their patients preferred hand-written prescriptions. CONCLUSION: A voluntary electronic prescription system was readily adopted by a majority of physicians who believed it would have a positive impact on the quality and efficiency of care. However, dissatisfaction with system capabilities among both adopters and non-adopters suggests the importance of user education and expectation management following system selection.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Computers , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Expert Systems , Medical Order Entry Systems/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Virginia/epidemiology
14.
Acad Med ; 80(2): 129-34, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15671315

ABSTRACT

Academic medical centers face barriers to training physicians in systems- and practice-based learning competencies needed to function in the changing health care environment. To address these problems, at the University of Virginia School of Medicine the authors developed the Clinical Health Economics System Simulation (CHESS), a computerized team-based quasi-competitive simulator to teach the principles and practical application of health economics. CHESS simulates treatment costs to patients and society as well as physician reimbursement. It is scenario based with residents grouped into three teams, each team playing CHESS using differing (fee-for-service or capitated) reimbursement models. Teams view scenarios and select from two or three treatment options that are medically justifiable yet have different potential cost implications. CHESS displays physician reimbursement and patient and societal costs for each scenario as well as costs and income summarized across all scenarios extrapolated to a physician's entire patient panel. The learners are asked to explain these findings and may change treatment options and other variables such as panel size and case mix to conduct sensitivity analyses in real time. Evaluations completed in 2003 by 68 (94%) CHESS resident and faculty participants at 19 U.S. residency programs preferred CHESS to a traditional lecture-and-discussion format to learn about medical decision making, physician reimbursement, patient costs, and societal costs. Ninety-eight percent reported increased knowledge of health economics after viewing the simulation. CHESS demonstrates the potential of computer simulation to teach health economics and other key elements of practice- and systems-based competencies.


Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction , Education, Medical, Graduate , Internship and Residency , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Decision Making , Faculty, Medical , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Models, Economic , United States
15.
Am J Med Qual ; 19(5): 207-13, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15532913

ABSTRACT

The objective was to evaluate whether physician feedback accompanied by an action checklist improved diabetes care process measures. Eighty-three physicians in an academic general medicine clinic were provided a single feedback report on the most recent date and result of diabetes care measures (glycosylated hemoglobin [A1c], urine microalbumin, serum creatinine, lipid levels, retinal examination) as well as recent diabetes medication refills with calculated dosing and adherence on 789 patients. An educational session regarding the feedback and adherence information was provided. The physicians were asked to complete a checklist accompanying the feedback on each of their patients, indicating requested actions with respect to follow-up, testing, and counseling. The physicians completed 82% of patient checklists, requesting actions consistent with patient needs on the basis of the feedback. Of the physicians, 93% felt the patient information and intervention format to be useful. The odds of urine microalbumin testing, serum creatinine, lipid profile, A1c, and retinal examination increased in the 6 months after the feedback. The increase was sustained at 1 year only for microalbumin and retinal exams. There was no significant change in refill adherence for the group overall after the feedback, although adherence did improve among patients of physicians attending the educational session. No significant change was noted in lipid or A1c levels during the study period. In conclusion, a simple physician feedback tool with action checklist can be both helpful and popular for improving rates of diabetes care guideline adherence. More complex interventions are likely required to improve diabetes outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Disease Management , Feedback , Physicians , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Virginia
16.
J Gen Intern Med ; 19(7): 719-25, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15209584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Voluntary reporting of near misses/adverse events is an important but underutilized source of information on errors in medicine. To date, there is very little information on errors in the ambulatory setting and physicians have not traditionally participated actively in their reporting or analysis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of clinician-based near miss/adverse event voluntary reporting coupled with systems analysis and redesign as a model for continuous quality improvement in the ambulatory setting. DESIGN: We report the initial 1-year experience of voluntary reporting by clinicians in the ambulatory setting, coupled with root cause analysis and system redesign by a patient safety committee made up of clinicians from the practice. SETTING: Internal medicine practice site of a large teaching hospital with 25,000 visits per year. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 100 reports in the 1-year period, increased from 5 in the previous year. Faculty physicians reported 44% of the events versus 22% by residents, 31% by nurses, and 3% by managers. Eighty-three percent were near misses and 17% were adverse events. Errors involved medication (47%), lab or x-rays (22%), office administration (21%), and communication (10%) processes. Seventy-two interventions were recommended with 75% implemented during the study period. CONCLUSION: This model of clinician-based voluntary reporting, systems analysis, and redesign was effective in increasing error reporting, particularly among physicians, and in promoting system changes to improve care and prevent errors. This process can be a powerful tool for incorporating error reporting and analysis into the culture of medicine.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Ambulatory Care/standards , Internal Medicine/standards , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Safety Management , Faculty, Medical , Feasibility Studies , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Systems Analysis , Voluntary Programs
17.
Am J Med Sci ; 327(1): 19-24, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14722392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although adherence to long-term drug therapy is an important issue, the means to facilitate its assessment and improvement in clinical practice remain a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of prescription refill feedback and adherence education provided to primary care physicians. METHODS: We provided 83 resident and attending physicians at a university-based general internal medicine practice with refill adherence reports on each of 340 diabetic patients. An educational session on adherence assessment and improvement techniques was held, and all physicians received a written outline on this topic. Physician attitude toward the intervention and 6-month change in refill adherence (doses filled/doses prescribed) of their patient panels were assessed. A nonrandomized comparison group of patients receiving hypertension medications for whom the physicians did not receive feedback was also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall improvement in mean refill adherence was not significant (83.9% vs 86.0%, P=0.18). The educational session was attended by 53% of the physicians. The patient refill adherence of physicians attending the educational session improved by 5.0% (P<0.0009) with no significant change among patients of physicians not attending the session. There was no adherence change among patients for whom physicians did not receive refill feedback data, regardless of educational session attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients of physicians that received refill feedback and attended an educational session improved their refill adherence. After replication of these results in a randomized trial, broad implementation of this approach could have substantial impact from a public health perspective, given the ubiquity of prescription claims data.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Knowledge of Results, Psychological , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Attitude of Health Personnel , Feedback , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/psychology , Social Class , Virginia
19.
Am J Med Sci ; 325(1): 7-9, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12544078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that antibiotics provide no benefit for acute bronchitis, yet 55 to 90% of patients who receive this diagnosis are treated with antibiotics. Given substantial data against antibiotics for acute bronchitis, it could be expected that physicians at academic teaching institutions would be less likely to prescribe antibiotics. However, limited data of antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in this setting has been published. METHODS: Charts of patients seen between January 1 and October 25, 2000, who received an ICD-9 diagnosis of acute bronchitis or upper respiratory infection (URI) at the University of Virginia internal medicine clinic were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had no cough, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, symptoms for > or = 3 weeks, or antibiotics for another reason. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients included in this study, 105 (66%) received an antibiotic. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with increasing age (P = 0.002), purulent cough (P = 0.003), abnormal exam (P = 0.003), and comorbidities (P = 0.03) were most likely to receive an antibiotic. Smoking, duration of symptoms, gender, and race did not predict antibiotic use (P > 0.05). Macrolides accounted for 68% of antibiotics. Twenty-two (14%) of all patients received a chest radiograph and 72 (45%) received an inhaler. Of those who had chest radiographs negative for signs of infection, 76% received an antibiotic. CONCLUSION: In our teaching clinic, antibiotics were overused, whereas chest radiographs and inhalers were underused for the evaluation and treatment of acute bronchitis. Recently published guidelines will help curb use of antibiotics, but a more intensive intervention, including physician and patient education is probably necessary.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Aging , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Analysis of Variance , Bronchitis/diagnosis , Bronchitis/diagnostic imaging , Cough , Drug Utilization , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Internship and Residency , Macrolides , Physicians , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Radiography , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Teaching , Universities
20.
Diabetes Care ; 25(6): 1015-21, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12032108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Studies of the association between diabetes metabolic control and adherence to drug therapy have yielded conflicting results. Because low socioeconomic and minority populations have poorer diabetes outcomes and greater barriers to adherence, we examined the relationship between adherence and diabetes metabolic control in a large indigent population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population consisted of patients receiving medical care from a university-based internal medicine clinic serving a low-income population in rural central Virginia. The sample comprised 810 patients with type 2 diabetes who received oral diabetes medications from the clinic pharmacy and had at least one HbA(1c) determination during the study period. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the association of HbA(1c) level as well as change in HbA(1c) level with medication adherence, demographic, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Better metabolic control was independently associated with greater medication adherence, increasing age, white (versus African-American) race, and lower intensity of drug therapy. For each 10% increment in drug adherence, HbA(1c) decreased by 0.16% (P < 0.0001). Controlling for other demographic and clinical variables, the mean HbA(1c) of African-Americans was 0.29% higher than that of whites (P = 0.04). Additionally, the intensity of diabetes drug therapy for African-Americans was lower, as was their measured adherence to it. There was no association between metabolic control and gender, income, encounter frequency, frequency of HbA(1c) testing, or continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to medication regimens for type 2 diabetes is strongly associated with metabolic control in an indigent population; African-Americans have lower adherence and worse metabolic control. Greater efforts are clearly needed to facilitate diabetes self-management behaviors of low-income populations and foster culturally sensitive and appropriate care for minority groups.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Patient Compliance , Poverty , Black People , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Income , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Regression Analysis , Virginia , White People
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...