Evaluation of a Computerized Insulin Dosing Tool for the Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

PURPOSE: Computerized insulin dosing tools (CIDT) have been shown to improve the care of critically ill patients with hyperglycemia. Application of a CIDT in addition to a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) order set for the treatment of DKA has not been evaluated. Our goal was to determine the effects the CIDT would have on the treatment of a patient with DKA. METHODS: In this retrospective, pre-post chart review, a provider-driven insulin dosing strategy (pregroup) was compared to the CIDT (postgroup) with 24-hour pharmacist monitoring. The CIDT utilized an equation that incorporated a patient's most recent blood glucose (BG) value and recommended a rate of insulin (units/hour) every hour. RESULTS: All baseline characterizes were similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in average time to anion gap closure (≤ 12 mEq/L) or intensive care unit length of stay between the pregroup and postgroup (12.5 [6] hours vs 10.5 [7] hours, P = 0.235; 40.6 [24] hours vs 40.8 [24] hours, P = 0.945). Although not statistically significant, 17 hypoglycemic events (BG < 70 mg/dL) occurred in the pregroup with 4 being severe (BG < 50 mg/dL) while 5 hypoglycemic events occurred in the postgroup, none of which were severe. CONCLUSION: This study suggests, when compared to a provider-driven insulin dosing strategy, the CIDT with 24-hour pharmacist monitoring is efficacious and safe for treatment of patients with a primary diagnosis of DKA.

Incidence of postpartum thrombosis and preterm delivery in women with antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of preterm deliveries and postpartum thrombotic events (TE) in pregnancies resulting in live birth in women with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) but without prior TE. METHODS: We reviewed the pregnancy outcomes of women referred to our clinic with a history of RPL. Prepregnancy investigation of RPL included history of TE and aPL positivity (anticardiolipin IgG and lupus anticoagulant). We recorded use of anticoagulation therapy during and after pregnancy, obstetric outcome, gestational age at delivery, and postpartum course. Included in our study were women with unexplained RPL with no history of TE attending our clinic who subsequently had pregnancies that resulted in a live birth. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, 260 women with RPL and no history of TE had a live birth at our clinic. Eighty-seven (33.5%) were positive for aPL and 173 (66.5%) were negative for aPL. Twenty-four percent of deliveries in the aPL-positive group occurred before 37 weeks' gestation compared to 9.8% of deliveries in the aPL-negative group (p = 0.004; 95% CI 0.052-0.234). There were no antepartum TE in either group. One woman in the aPL-positive group (1.1%) had a deep vein thrombosis 3.5 weeks postpartum while receiving prophylactic anticoagulant therapy, compared to none in the aPL-negative group. CONCLUSION: A significantly higher proportion of aPL-positive patients had preterm deliveries compared to aPL-negative patients, but pregnancy-related TE was infrequent: 99.0% of aPL-positive women with a history of RPL and no prior TE who had a live birth at our clinic had an uneventful pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum course.

Preterm deliveries in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical, laboratory, and demographic variables of women in our clinic with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have had a pregnancy resulting in a live birth and identify any correlations with either term or preterm delivery. METHODS: Pregnancies in women with SLE from 1999 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. We recorded demographic data, disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index, SLEDAI), obstetric history, prednisone dosage, other medications taken during pregnancy, history of renal disease, and autoantibody status [including antinuclear antibody, anti-DNA, anticardiolipin IgG (aCL), and lupus anticoagulant (LAC)]. Preterm delivery was defined as gestational age at delivery < 37 weeks. We performed a literature survey using PubMed and the key words SLE, pregnancy, and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 72 pregnancies, 28 (38.9%) resulted in preterm deliveries. There were no significant differences in any demographic or disease variables measured comparing term versus preterm delivery groups. More women in the preterm group were taking > or = 10 mg/day prednisone during their pregnancy (50.0% vs 22.2%; p = 0.028), and the mean dose was significantly higher than the term group taking > or = 10 mg/day (24.8 vs 16.7 mg/day; p = 0.047). There was a higher prevalence of women with aCL IgG in the preterm group (p = 0.023). The mean weeks gestation was shorter for women positive for aCL IgG compared to the group negative for aCL (34.9 +/- 4.4 vs 37.5 +/- 3.2 weeks, respectively; p = 0.032). There was no difference in second trimester disease activity between the term and preterm groups (33.3% and 36.4% of each group had a SLEDAI of 0). However, significantly more women in the term group received no medication during their pregnancies compared to women in the preterm group (20.0% vs 0.0%; p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The rates of preterm deliveries, premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine growth restriction, and aPL in SLE pregnancies vary considerably in published reports, most of which are retrospective analyses. Our rates closely approximate the median values for all measures. We found preterm deliveries to be associated with disease activity (as determined by the use of any medication throughout pregnancy vs no medication, and prednisone dose > or = 10 mg/day) and the presence of aCL IgG but not LAC. Our results suggest that inactive disease rather than controlled disease at the onset of pregnancy may be the determining factor in extending SLE pregnancies to full term, thereby decreasing maternal and fetal morbidity.