Comparing randomized controlled trials of outpatient family-based or inpatient multimodal treatment followed by outpatient care in youth with anorexia nervosa: Differences in populations, metrics, and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Various approaches exist to treat youth with anorexia nervosa (AN). Family-based treatment (FBT) has never been compared to long inpatient, multimodal treatment (IMT) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim of this study was to compare data on body weight trajectories, change in eating disorder psychopathology, hospital days and treatment costs in RCTs delivering FBT or IMT. METHOD: Review of RCTs published between 2010 and 2020 in youth with AN, delivering FBT or IMT. RESULTS: Four RCTs delivering FBT (United States, n = 2; Australia, n = 2), one RCT delivering Family Therapy for AN (United Kingdom) and two RCTs delivering IMT (France, n = 1; Germany, n = 1) were identified from previous meta-analyses. The comparison of studies was limited by (1) significant differences in patient baseline characteristics including pretreated versus non-pretreated patients, (2) use of different psychometric and weight measures and (3) different initial velocity of weight recovery. Minimal baseline and outcome reporting standards for body weight metrics and nature/dose of interventions allowing international comparison are needed and suggestions to developing these standards are presented. DISCUSSION: An RCT should investigate, whether FBT is a viable alternative to IMT, leading to comparable weight and psychopathology improvement with less inpatient time and costs.

The Impact of Inpatient Multimodal Treatment or Family-Based Treatment on Six-Month Weight Outcomes in Youth with Anorexia Nervosa: A Naturalistic, Cross-Continental Comparison.

In the USA, family-based treatment (FBT) with inpatient medical stabilization as needed is the leading evidence-based treatment for youth with anorexia nervosa (AN). In continental Europe, typically inpatient multimodal treatment targeting weight recovery followed by outpatient care (IMT) is standard care, if prior outpatient treatment was not sufficient. Our aim was to compare weekly weight gain and hospital days over six months for adolescents receiving FBT (USA) versus IMT (Germany) using naturalistic treatment data. To yield similar subgroups of youth aged 12−18 years, inclusion criteria were a percent median BMI (%mBMI) between 70−85 and the restrictive AN subtype. Weight gain and hospital days were compared, adjusted further in a multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) for baseline group differences. Samples differed on baseline %mBMI (FBT [n = 71], 90.5 ± 12.8; IMT [n = 29], 78.3 ± 9.1, p < 0.05). In subgroups with comparable baseline %mBMI, the weekly weight gain over 6 months was similar (FBT [n = 21]: 0.35 ± 0.18 kg/week; IMT [n = 20]: 0.30 ± 0.18, p = 0.390, p = 0.166 after MLRA), but achieved fewer hospital days in FBT (FBT [n = 7]: 4 ± 6 days, IMT [n = 20]: 121 ± 42 days, p < 0.0001 before and after MLRA). FBT may be effective for a subgroup of adolescents with AN currently receiving IMT, but head-to-head studies in the same healthcare system are needed.