Mammography Screening Outreach Through Non-Primary Care-Based Services.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of patients visiting urgent care centers or emergency departments or being hospitalized who were not up to date with recommended mammography screening to assess the potential impact of non-primary care-based cancer screening interventions. METHODS: Adult participants from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey were included. Among participants not up to date with breast cancer screening guidelines based on ACR recommendations, the proportion of patients reporting an urgent care, emergency department visit, or hospitalization within the last year was estimated accounting for complex survey sampling design features. Multiple variable logistic regression analyses were then conducted to evaluate the association between sociodemographic characteristics and mammography screening adherence. RESULTS: The study included 9,139 women between the ages of 40 and 74 years without history of breast cancer. Of these respondents, 44.9% did not report mammography screening within the last year. Among participants who did not report mammography screening, 29.2% reported visiting an urgent care center, 21.8% reported visiting an emergency room, and 9.6% reported being hospitalized within the last year. The majority of patients receiving non-primary care-based services, who were not up to date with mammography screening, were from historically underserved groups including Black and Hispanic patients. CONCLUSION: Nearly 10% to 30% of participants who have not obtained recommended breast cancer screening have visited non-primary care-based services including urgent care centers or emergency rooms or have been hospitalized within the last year.

A "High-Reliability Organization" Approach to Improve Trauma Imaging Performance.

PURPOSE: CT is the gold standard for triaging critically ill patients, including in trauma, and its use has increased over time. CT turnaround times (TATs) are frequently targeted for improvement. As opposed to linear reductionist processes such as Lean and Six Sigma, a high-reliability organization (HRO) approach focuses on culture and teams to enable rapid problem solving. The authors evaluated the HRO model to rapidly generate, trial, select, and implement improvement interventions to improve trauma patient CT performance. METHODS: All trauma patients presenting to a single institution's emergency department during a 5-month period were included. Project periods included 2-month preintervention, 1-month wash-in, and 2-month postintervention. Each initial trauma CT encounter during the wash-in and postintervention periods created job briefs in which the radiologist ensured that all involved had the pertinent clinical information and agreed on the imaging needed, thereby creating a shared mental model as well as an opportunity to raise concerns and provide ideas for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were included: 145 preintervention, 68 wash-in, and 234 postintervention. The seven selected interventions were trauma text alert; scripted CT technologist-radiologist communication; modification of CT acquisition, processing, sending, and interpretation; and trauma mobile phones. The seven selected interventions reduced trauma patient CT median TATs by 60% (78 vs 31 min, P < .001), demonstrating the effectiveness of an HRO approach to improvement. CONCLUSIONS: An HRO-based approach was rapid in generating, trialing, selecting, and implementing improvement interventions, and the interventions were effective at substantially decreasing trauma patient CT TATs.

Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in Patients Receiving Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department.

PURPOSE: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a frequent incidental finding on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED); however, its prognostic value is unclear. In this study, we interrogate the prognostic value of CAC identified on CTPA in predicting adverse outcomes in the evaluation of PE in the ED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 610 patients presenting to the ED in 2013 and evaluated with CTPA for suspected PE. Ordinal CAC scores were evaluated as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) in each of the 4 main coronary arteries. Composite CAC scores were subsequently compared against adverse clinical outcomes, defined as intensive care unit admission, hospital stay longer than 72 hours, or death during hospital course or at 6-month follow-up, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Relevant exclusion criteria included a history of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: In all, 365 patients met the inclusion criteria (231 women, mean age 56±16 y) with 132 patients (36%) having some degree of CAC and 16 (4%) having severe CAC. Known malignancy was present in 151 (41%) patients and composite adverse clinical outcomes were observed in 98 patients (32%). Age, presence of acute PE, malignancy, and presence of CAC were significant predictors of adverse outcomes on both univariate and multivariate analyses. CAC was not an independent predictor of short-term adverse outcomes on multivariate analysis ( P =0.06) when all patients were considered. However, when patients with known malignancy were excluded, CAC was an independent predictor of short-term adverse outcomes (odds ratio=2.5, confidence interval=1.1-5.5, P =0.03) independent of age and presence of PE. CONCLUSION: The presence of CAC on CT PA was predictive of adverse outcomes in patients without known cardiac disease presenting to the ED with suspected PE.

Update of the AMSER National Medical Student Curriculum.

Since the first steps of creating the Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology (AMSER) curriculum 20 years ago, dramatic advances in medical imaging, patient care, and medical education have occurred necessitating an update of this valuable resource. The 2020 update of the AMSER curriculum aims to address as many of these changes while providing a succinct resource that will hopefully remain useful for years to come. The updated AMSER curriculum document is freely available for download via the AMSER website at https://www.aur.org/en/affinity-groups/amser/curriculum.

Meeting Faculty Development Needs: Review of Current Resources and Opportunities for Program Development.

This paper will review faculty development focus and programming at the early, mid and late career stages. Topics covered include challenges at each career stage, institutional and national programming currently available for the needs of faculty at that stage, and suggested best practices for development of new career focus and potential programs for each stage.

Radiology Imaging Volume Changes During Discrete COVID-19 Pandemic Waves: Implications for the Delta Variant of Coronavirus and Future Pandemics.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate radiology imaging volumes at distinct time periods throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a function of regional COVID-19 hospitalizations. METHODS: Radiology imaging volumes and statewide COVID-19 hospitalizations were collected, and four 28-day time periods throughout the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 were analyzed: pre-COVID-19 in January, the "first wave" of COVID-19 hospitalizations in April, the "recovery" time period in the summer of 2020 with a relative nadir of COVID-19 hospitalizations, and the "third wave" of COVID-19 hospitalizations in November. Imaging studies were categorized as inpatient, outpatient, or emergency department on the basis of patient location at the time of acquisition. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare daily imaging volumes during each discrete 28-day time period. RESULTS: Imaging volumes overall during the first wave of COVID-19 infections were 55% (11,098/20,011; P < .001) of pre-COVID-19 imaging volumes. Overall imaging volumes returned during the recovery time period to 99% (19,915/20,011; P = .725), and third-wave imaging volumes compared with the pre-COVID-19 period were significantly lower in the emergency department at 88.8% (7,951/8,955; P < .001), significantly higher for outpatients at 115.7% (8,818/7,621; P = .008), not significantly different for inpatients at 106% (3,650/3,435; P = .053), and overall unchanged when aggregated together at 102% (20,419/20,011; P = .629). CONCLUSIONS: Medical imaging rebounded after the first wave of COVID-19 hospitalizations, with relative stability of utilization over the ensuing phases of the pandemic. As widespread COVID-19 vaccination continues to occur, future surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations will likely have a negligible impact on imaging utilization.

Imaging Manifestations of Chest Trauma.

Trauma is the leading cause of death among individuals under 40 years of age, and pulmonary trauma is common in high-impact injuries. Unlike most other organs, the lung is elastic and distensible, with a physiologic capacity to withstand significant changes in contour and volume. The most common types of lung parenchymal injury are contusions, lacerations, and hematomas, each having characteristic imaging appearances. A less common type of lung injury is herniation. Chest radiography is often the first-line imaging modality performed in the assessment of the acutely injured patient, although there are inherent limitations in the use of this modality in trauma. CT images are more accurate for the assessment of the nature and extent of pulmonary injury than the single-view anteroposterior chest radiograph that is typically obtained in the trauma bay. However, the primary limitations of CT concern the need to transport the patient to the CT scanner and a longer processing time. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma has established the most widely used grading scale to describe lung injury, which serves to communicate severity, guide management, and provide useful prognostic factors in a systematic fashion. The authors provide an in-depth exploration of the most common types of pulmonary parenchymal, pleural, and airway injuries. Injury grading, patient management, and potential complications of pulmonary injury are also discussed. ©RSNA, 2021.

Vice Chair for Education: Twelve Roles to Provide a Framework for Success.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: An increase in the administrative work in our healthcare system has led to an increase in the number of administrative positions in radiology departments. Many of these are Vice Chair roles, including Vice Chair for Education (VCEd). The responsibility of this position has expanded, often far beyond the original definition. This article defines the role and expectations of the Vice Chair for Education and provides suggestions for success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article will review 12 vital roles that a Vice Chair for Education must play to be an effective advocate for radiology education within a department. RESULTS: Key attributes of an educational leader are delineated, divided into 12 areas or roles. CONCLUSION: This article summarizes key leadership skills needed by Vice Chairs for Education in order for them to be effective in their role.

Therapy-Induced Evolution of Human Lung Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.

Lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer mortality, exhibits heterogeneity that enables adaptability, limits therapeutic success, and remains incompletely understood. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of metastatic lung cancer was performed using 49 clinical biopsies obtained from 30 patients before and during targeted therapy. Over 20,000 cancer and tumor microenvironment (TME) single-cell profiles exposed a rich and dynamic tumor ecosystem. scRNA-seq of cancer cells illuminated targetable oncogenes beyond those detected clinically. Cancer cells surviving therapy as residual disease (RD) expressed an alveolar-regenerative cell signature suggesting a therapy-induced primitive cell-state transition, whereas those present at on-therapy progressive disease (PD) upregulated kynurenine, plasminogen, and gap-junction pathways. Active T-lymphocytes and decreased macrophages were present at RD and immunosuppressive cell states characterized PD. Biological features revealed by scRNA-seq were biomarkers of clinical outcomes in independent cohorts. This study highlights how therapy-induced adaptation of the multi-cellular ecosystem of metastatic cancer shapes clinical outcomes.

Parents of Pediatric Radiology Patients Prefer Timely Reporting and Discussing Results with Referring Providers.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: With the introduction of new communication channels, such as encrypted messaging and online electronic medical record patient portals, there are ever-increasing ways for patients and their families to access their medical information. While patient preferences regarding how they receive the results of their radiology examinations have been assessed in the adult population, there is limited data on parent preferences for pediatric radiology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine how the parents of pediatric radiology patients prefer to receive the results of their child's imaging studies. The study design was an institutional review board-approved anonymous voluntary survey distributed to parents in a pediatric radiology waiting room. RESULTS: Of the current possible ways to receive radiology results, most parents preferred to receive their child's radiology results from the referring doctor (65%). A minority of parents preferred to receive the results from a radiologist in-person (16%) or via the radiology report (16%). In multiple hypothetical scenarios, parents also preferred to receive radiology results from the referring doctor rather than the radiologist, with the single exception being when no subsequent appointment with the referring doctor was planned. When asked to prioritize the most important aspect of receiving radiology test results, most parents prefer having results available quickly (65%). CONCLUSION: This survey suggests that in the pediatric radiology realm, efforts toward timely reporting will likely have a greater impact on patient satisfaction than prioritizing more in-person radiologist-patient communication.

Dedicated Diagnostic Radiology/Radiation Oncology Rounds: Added Value Beyond Traditional Tumor Boards.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the impact of collaborative discussion between diagnostic radiologists and radiation oncologists on radiation oncology management for thoracic oncology patients. METHODS: We reviewed cases presented at multidisciplinary thoracic tumor boards (TTB) (n = 122) and diagnostic radiology/radiation oncology rounds (DR/ROR) (n = 45). Changes in planned radiation management following imaging discussion were categorized-no change, timing change, and treatment volume change. Phase of care was also classified. In DR/ROR, radiation oncologists were surveyed regarding (1) change in radiation oncology management and (2) change in confidence (both 5-point Likert scales). RESULTS: Discussion of imaging with a radiologist changed radiation oncology management in 31.1% of TTB cases and 68.9% of DR/ROR cases (P < 0.001). Changes to the timing of initiating radiation therapy occurred with similar frequency in the 2 settings (31.1% vs 46.7%, P = 0.063). Changes to target volume occurred more frequently in DR/ROR (35.6% vs <1%), P < 0.001. Over half of imaging discussions in DR/ROR resulted in at least "moderate" change in radiation oncology management, and the level of confidence held by the radiation oncologists increased following discussion with radiologists in 95.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: Collaborative discussions between radiation oncologists and diagnostic radiologists in a multispecialty tumor board and in targeted 2-specialty rounds are not redundant, but result in different management changes and at different phases of care. Our study emphasizes the importance of consultation with physicians as an area where radiologists can add value, specifically the added benefit of smaller collaborative discussions.

Pre and Post Procedure Imaging of the Watchman® Device with Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Watchman® device requires pre and post procedure imaging. Currently, transesophageal echocardiography is the recommended modality, though cardiac computed tomography angiography may be an acceptable alternative. RECENT FINDINGS: Cardiac computed tomography angiography can be used to safely and accurately predict Watchman® device sizing. It can also be used to detect post procedure complications similar to, or better than, transesophageal echocardiography. Cardiac computed tomography angiography is a viable alternative imaging modality for pre and post procedure evaluation for the Watchman device.

Integrated PET-MRI for Glioma Surveillance: Perfusion-Metabolism Discordance Rate and Association With Molecular Profiling.

OBJECTIVE: Both 18F-FDG PET and perfusion MRI are commonly used techniques for posttreatment glioma surveillance. Using integrated PET-MRI, we assessed the rate of discordance between simultaneously acquired FDG PET images and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion MR images and determined whether tumor genetics predicts discordance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with high-grade gliomas (20 with grade IV gliomas and 21 with grade III gliomas) underwent a standardized tumor protocol performed using an integrated 3-T PET-MRI scanner. Quantitative measures of standardized uptake value, plasma volume, and permeability were obtained from segmented whole-tumor volumes of interest and targeted ROIs. ROC curve analysis and the Youden index were used to identify optimal cutoffs for FDG PET and DCE-MRI. Two-by-two contingency tables and percent agreement were used to assess accuracy and concordance. Twenty-six patients (63%) from the cohort underwent next-generation sequencing for tumor genetics. RESULTS: The best-performing FDG PET and DCE-MRI cutoffs achieved sensitivities of 94% and 91%, respectively; specificities of 56% and 89%, respectively; and accuracies of 80% and 83%, respectively. FDG PET and DCE-MRI findings were discordant for 11 patients (27%), with DCE-MRI findings correct for six of these patients (55%). Tumor grade, tumor volume, bevacizumab exposure, and time since radiation predicted discordance between FDG PET and DCE-MRI findings, with an ROC AUC value of 0.78. Isocitrate dehydrogenase gene and receptor tyrosine kinase gene pathway mutations increased the ROC AUC value to 0.83. CONCLUSION: FDG PET and DCE-MRI show comparable accuracy and sensitivity in identifying tumor progression. These modalities were shown to have discordant findings for more than a quarter of the patients assessed. Tumor genetics may contribute to perfusion-metabolism discordance, warranting further investigation.