Effect of didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride-impregnated washcloth wipe whole-body bathing on catheter-related blood stream infections and central venous line-associated infections in adult intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of daily whole-body bathing (WBB) using disposable washcloth wipes/caps impregnated with an antiseptic solution containing the quaternary ammonium base compound didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC). METHODS: A prospective double-blind randomized crossover trial was conducted to compare WBB of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with washcloth wipes/caps impregnated with either regular cleanser/shampoo or the antiseptic DDAC. The clinical trial was performed in a medical ICU (MICU) and a surgical ICU (SICU). The study period was divided into two 6-month intervals with alternating treatment regimens. RESULTS: A total of 1540 ICU patients (total length of ICU stay 10 470 days) were included in the trial. Compared to controls, DDAC bathing was found to be associated with reduced incidence rates per 1000 patient days for central-venous-line-associated infections (CLAIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) from 16.39 (95%CI 13.1-20.3) in the control group to 7.28 (95%CI 5.2-9.9) in the intervention group (p 0.01). A stratified analysis by unit showed that the incidence rates of CLAI due to GPB were reduced by the intervention in both the MICU and the SICU from 21.2 (95%CI 15.8-27.7) to 9.3 (95%CI 5.8-14.1) (p < 0.01) and from 12.1 (95%CI 8.3-17.0) to 5.7 (95%CI 3.4-9.1) (p 0.01), respectively. There was a trend towards reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and bloodstream infections (BSIs); however, this did not reach statistical significance due to carry-over effects and small numbers. CONCLUSIONS: Given the growing need for new concepts to prevent and control healthcare-associated infections, DDAC may be a new and promising agent for WBB of ICU patients.

Association of preventable adverse drug events with inpatients' length of stay-A propensity-matched cohort study.

PURPOSE: Using clinical administrative data (CAD) of inpatients, we aimed to identify ICD-10 codes coding for potentially preventable inhospital adverse drug events (ADE) that affect the length of hospital stay (LOS) and thus patient well-being and cost. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed CAD of all inpatient stays in 2012 of a German university hospital. Predefined ICD-10 codes indicating ADE (ADE codes) were further specified based on expert ratings of the ADE mechanism and ADE preventability in clinical routine to particularly identify preventable inhospital ADE. In a propensity-matched cohort design, we compared patients with one or more ADE codes to control patients with regard to differences in LOS for three situations: all cases with an ADE code, cases with an inhospital ADE code, and cases with a preventable inhospital ADE code. RESULTS: Out of 54 032 cases analysed, in 8.3% (N=4 462) at least one ADE code was present. Nine of 128 evaluated ADE codes were rated as preventable in clinical routine, relating to 220 inpatients (4.9% of all identified inpatients with at least one ADE code and 0.4% of the entire cohort, respectively). Out of 48 072 evaluable inpatients for propensity score matching, 7 938 controls without ADE code and 4 006 cases with ADE code were selected. In all three settings, cases showed prolonged LOS vs controls (delta 1.13 d; 0.88 d and 1.88 d, respectively), significantly exceeding the maximum LOS as defined for each Diagnosis-Related Group. CONCLUSION: Inpatients with ADE codes referring to inhospital, potentially preventable ADE exceeded the maximum hospital stay fully reimbursed by insurance companies, indicating unnecessary long and costly inpatient stays.