Relationships of Radiation Dose Indices with Body Size Indices in Adult Body Computed Tomography.

We investigated the relationships between radiation dose indices and body size indices in adult body computed tomography (CT). A total of 3200 CT scans of the thoracic, abdominal, abdominopelvic, or thoraco-abdominopelvic regions performed using one of four CT scanners were analyzed. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were compared with various body size indices derived from CT images (water-equivalent diameter, WED; effective diameter, ED) and physical measurements (weight, weight/height, body mass index, and body surface area). CTDIvol showed excellent positive linear correlations with WED and ED. CTDIvol also showed high linear correlations with physical measurement-based indices, whereas the correlation coefficients were lower than for WED and ED. Among the physical measurement-based indices, weight/height showed the strongest correlations, followed by weight. Compared to CTDIvol, the correlation coefficients with DLP tended to be lower for WED, ED, and weight/height and higher for weight. The standard CTDIvol values at 60 kg and dose increase ratios with increasing weight, estimated using the regression equations, differed among scanners. Radiation dose indices closely correlated with body size indices such as WED, ED, weight/height, and weight. The relationships between dose and body size differed among scanners, indicating the significance of dose management considering body size.

Factors affecting dose-length product of computed tomography component in whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

In whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), it is important to optimise the CT radiation dose. We have investigated factors affecting the dose-length product (DLP) of the CT component of whole-body PET/CT and derived equations to predict the DLP. In this retrospective study, 1596 whole-body oncology PET/CT examinations with18F-fluorodeoxyglucose were analysed. Automatic exposure control was used to modulate radiation dose in CT. Considering age, weight, sex, arm position (up, down, one arm up), scan range (up to the mid-thigh or feet), scan mode (spiral or respiratory-triggered nonspiral) and the presence of a metal prosthesis as potential factors, multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of DLP and to determine equations to predict DLP. DLP values were predicted using the obtained equations, and compared with actual values. Among body size indices, weight best correlated with DLP in examinations performed under the standard imaging conditions (arms: up; scan range: up to the mid-thigh; scan mode: spiral; and no metal prosthesis). Multivariate analysis indicated that weight, arm position, scan range and scan mode were substantial independent predictors; lowering the arms, extending the scan range and using respiratory-triggered imaging, as well as increasing weight, increased DLP. The degree of the DLP increase tended to increase with increasing weight. The DLP values were predicted using equations that considered these parameters were in excellent agreement with the actual values. The DLP for the CT component of whole-body PET/CT is affected by weight, arm position, scan range and scan mode, and can be predicted with excellent accuracy using these factors.

Conversion from dose-length product to effective dose in computed tomography venography of the lower extremities.

For radiation dose assessment of computed tomography (CT), effective dose (ED) is often estimated by multiplying the dose-length product (DLP), provided automatically by the CT scanner, by a conversion factor. We investigated such conversion in CT venography of the lower extremities performed in conjunction with CT pulmonary angiography. The study subjects consisted of eight groups imaged using different scanners and different imaging conditions (five and three groups for the GE and Siemens scanners, respectively). Each group included ten men and ten women. The scan range was divided into four anatomical regions (trunk, proximal thigh, knee and distal leg), and DLP was calculated for each region (regional DLP). Regional DLP was multiplied by a conversion factor for the respective region, to convert it to ED. The sum of the ED values for the four regions was obtained as standard ED. Additionally, the sum of the four regional DLP values, an approximate of the scanner-derived DLP, was multiplied by the conversion factor for the trunk (0.015 mSv mGy cm-1), as a simplified method to obtain ED. When using the simplified method, ED was overestimated by 32.3%-70.2% and 56.5%-66.2% for the GE and Siemens scanners, respectively. The degree of overestimation was positively and closely correlated with the contribution of the middle and distal portions of the lower extremities to total radiation exposure. ED/DLP averaged within each group, corresponding to the conversion factor, was 0.0089-0.0114 and 0.0091-0.0096 mSv mGy cm-1for the GE and Siemens scanners, respectively. In CT venography of the lower extremities, ED is greatly overestimated by multiplying the scanner-derived DLP by the conversion factor for the trunk. The degree of overestimation varies widely depending on the imaging conditions. It is recommended to divide the scan range and calculate ED as a sum of regional ED values.

Conversion from dose length product to effective dose for the CT component of whole-body PET/CT.

OBJECTIVE: For dose management of CT, the ratio of effective dose (ED) to dose length product (DLP) is often used to convert DLP to ED. We evaluated this ratio in the CT component of whole-body PET/CT performed under various imaging conditions to determine a practical method for ED estimation applicable to PET/CT. METHODS: In total, 400 patients who underwent whole-body PET/CT were enrolled. The imaging conditions were variable in terms of the scanner model, setting of automatic exposure control (AEC) setting and arm positioning. The scan range was divided into six anatomical regions. DLP was calculated for each region, and multiplied by the conversion factor for the respective region to determine regional ED. The six regional EDs were summed together to determine ED by the regional DLP method (EDrDLP). Additionally, regional ED was assessed using CT-Expo, software dedicated to CT dose estimation, and the total of six regional EDs were defined as ED by the CT-Expo method (EDCT-Expo). EDrDLP/DLP and EDCT-Expo/DLP were calculated using DLP automatically provided by the scanner. RESULTS: EDrDLP/DLP ranged from 0.0121 to 0.0128 mSv/mGy/cm with the arms up and from 0.0127 to 0.0134 mSv/mGy/cm with the arms down. Putting the arms down slightly increased EDrDLP/DLP, presumably due to an increased contribution of the chest and abdomen to total radiation exposure. The AEC setting and scanner model also influenced EDrDLP/DLP significantly but slightly. EDCT-Expo/DLP showed apparent scanner dependence, which appeared mainly attributable to differences in the constants used for DLP calculation between the scanner and CT-Expo. CONCLUSION: Multiplication of scanner-derived DLP by a conversion factor of 0.013 mSv/mGy/cm provides acceptable ED estimates.

SUBOPTIMAL MODULATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN THE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COMPONENT OF WHOLE-BODY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.

Radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) is automatically modulated by automatic exposure control (AEC) mainly based on scout images. To simulate the whole-body positron emission tomography/CT, CT images of a phantom were obtained using the posteroanterior scout image alone (PA scout) or the posteroanterior and lateral images (PA + Lat scout). Old and new versions of the AEC software were compared. Using the old version of the software and the PA scout, a markedly high dose at the top of the head was observed, which varied depending on the position of the phantom. This issue was resolved in the new version of the software. Radiation dose in the shoulder region was much higher using the PA scout than using the PA + Lat scout, even with the new version of the software. AEC may cause unreasonably high radiation exposure locally, and the appropriateness of the dose modulation pattern should be examined at each facility.

ESTIMATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN CT VENOGRAPHY OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES: PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS USING DIFFERENT AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL SETTINGS AND SCAN RANGES.

We performed phantom experiments to assess radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) venography of the lower extremities. CT images of a whole-body phantom were acquired using different automatic exposure control settings and scan ranges, simulating CT venography. Tube current decreased in the lower extremities compared to the trunk. The scout direction and dose modulation strength affected tube current, dose length product (DLP) and effective dose. The middle and distal portions of the lower extremities contributed substantially to DLP but not to effective dose. When effective dose was estimated by multiplying DLP by a single conversion factor, overestimation was evident; this became more pronounced as the scan range narrowed. In CT venography of the lower extremities, the scout direction and modulation strength affect radiation dose. Use of DLP severely overestimates radiation dose and underestimates effects of scan range narrowing.

Clinical evaluation of CT radiation dose in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in relation to scout imaging direction and arm position.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation exposure in CT is modulated by automatic exposure control (AEC) mainly based on scout images. We evaluated CT radiation dose in whole-body PET/CT in relation to scout imaging direction and arm position, and investigated the behavior of AEC. METHODS: Eighty adult patients who underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT were divided into groups A, B, C, and D. The posteroanterior scout image alone (PA scout) was used for AEC-based dose modulation in groups A and B, while the posteroanterior and lateral scout images (PA + Lat scout) were used in groups C and D. Patients in groups A and C were imaged with their arms beside the head, while those in groups B and D were imaged with their arms at the sides of the trunk. Dose-length product provided by the scanner was recorded. The tube current value, a determinant of radiation dose, for each slice was plotted against slice location to produce a tube current modulation curve. The scan range was divided into seven anatomical regions, and regional tube current was defined as average tube current for each region. Effective dose was calculated for each region and then summed together. RESULTS: Regional tube current was higher in the body trunk and proximal thigh using the PA scout than using the PA + Lat scout, resulting in higher dose-length product and effective dose using the PA scout. A marked dose increase was shown in the shoulder especially using the PA scout. Spike-like high current at the top of the head was often observed in tube current modulation curves using the PA scout but not using the PA + Lat scout. Raising the arms increased tube current in the head and neck and decreased it in the chest and abdomen. Although dose-length product did not differ significantly depending on arm position, raising the arms decreased effective dose significantly. CONCLUSIONS: AEC-based CT dose modulation in whole-body PET/CT is affected by scout imaging direction and arm position, which should be considered to determine an optimal imaging protocol for whole-body PET/CT.

EFFECTS OF THE SCAN RANGE ON RADIATION DOSE IN THE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COMPONENT OF ONCOLOGY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.

We performed phantom experiments to investigate radiation dose in the computed tomography component of oncology positron emission tomography/computed tomography in relation to the scan range. Computed tomography images of an anthropomorphic whole-body phantom were obtained from the head top to the feet, from the head top to the proximal thigh or from the skull base to the proximal thigh. Automatic exposure control using the posteroanterior and lateral scout images offered reasonable tube current modulation corresponding to the body thickness. However, when the posteroanterior scout alone was used, unexpectedly high current was applied in the head and upper chest. When effective dose was calculated on a region-by-region basis, it did not differ greatly irrespective of the scan range. In contrary, when effective dose was estimated simply by multiplying the scanner-derived dose-length product by a single conversion factor, estimates increased definitely with the scan range, indicating severe overestimation in whole-body imaging.

CT dose modulation using automatic exposure control in whole-body PET/CT: effects of scout imaging direction and arm positioning.

Automatic exposure control (AEC) modulates tube current and consequently X-ray exposure in CT. We investigated the behavior of AEC systems in whole-body PET/CT. CT images of a whole-body phantom were acquired using AEC on two scanners from different manufactures. The effects of scout imaging direction and arm positioning on dose modulation were evaluated. Image noise was assessed in the chest and upper abdomen. On one scanner, AEC using two scout images in the posteroanterior (PA) and lateral (Lat) directions provided relatively constant image noise along the z-axis with the arms at the sides. Raising the arms increased tube current in the head and neck and decreased it in the body trunk. Image noise increased in the upper abdomen, suggesting excessive reduction in radiation exposure. AEC using the PA scout alone strikingly increased tube current and reduced image noise in the shoulder. Raising the arms did not substantially influence dose modulation and decreased noise in the abdomen. On the other scanner, AEC using the PA scout alone or Lat scout alone resulted in similar dose modulation. Raising the arms increased tube current in the head and neck and decreased it in the trunk. Image noise was higher in the upper abdomen than in the middle and lower chest, and was not influenced by arm positioning. CT dose modulation using AEC may vary greatly depending on scout direction. Raising the arms tended to decrease radiation exposure; however, the effect depends on scout direction and the AEC system.

MONITORING DOSE-LENGTH PRODUCT IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST CONSIDERING SEX AND BODY WEIGHT.

Dose-length product (DLP) is widely used as an indicator of the radiation dose in computed tomography. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of sex and body weight in DLP-based monitoring of the radiation dose. Eight hundred computed tomographies of the chest performed using four different scanners were analysed. The DLP was compared with body weight by linear regression in men and women separately. The DLP was positively correlated with body weight, and dependence on sex and weight differed among scanners. Standard DLP values adjusted for sex and weight facilitated interscanner comparison of the radiation dose and its dependence on sex and weight. Adjusting the DLP for sex and weight allowed one to identify examinations with possibly excessive doses independently of weight. Monitoring the DLP in relation to sex and body weight appears to aid detailed comparison of the radiation dose among imaging protocols and scanners and daily observations to find unexpected variance.

Methods of CT Dose Estimation in Whole-Body ¹8F-FDG PET/CT.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effective dose (ED) of the CT component of whole-body PET/CT using software dedicated to CT dose estimation and from dose-length product (DLP) values to establish practical methods of ED estimation. METHODS: Eighty adult patients who underwent (18)F-FDG whole-body PET/CT were divided into groups A and B, each consisting of 20 men and 20 women. In group A, ED of the CT component was calculated using CT-Expo for 6 anatomic regions separately, and whole-body ED was obtained by summing the regional EDs (CT-Expo method). DLP was calculated for each of the 6 regions and multiplied by a corresponding conversion factor described in International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 102 to obtain the ED for each region (regional DLP method). Whole-body ED was also calculated as the product of a whole-body DLP value provided by the scanner automatically and a conversion factor (simple DLP method). Moreover, the ED/DLP values were calculated using whole-body ED estimated by the CT-Expo method and the scanner-derived DLP, to optimize the conversion factor. In group B, the optimized conversion factor was applied for the estimation of ED by the simple DLP method. RESULTS: In group A, the regional DLP method allowed an accurate estimation of mean whole-body ED as a result of counterbalance of mild overestimation in men and mild underestimation in women, regarding the CT-Expo method as a standard. The simple DLP method using a conversion factor for the trunk (0.015 mSv/mGy/cm) caused overestimation. On the basis of the ED/DLP values in group A, a modified conversion factor of 0.013 mSv/mGy/cm and sex-specific conversion factors of 0.012 and 0.014 mSv/mGy/cm for men and women, respectively, were determined. In group B, the use of the modified conversion factor improved accuracy, and the use of sex-specific conversion factors eliminated sex-dependent residual errors. CONCLUSION: ED of the CT component of whole-body PET/CT can be assessed by multiplying the scanner-derived DLP by a conversion factor optimized for whole-body PET/CT.