Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Allergol Int ; 66(1): 106-115, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27507228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is effective and well-tolerated in children with moderate to severe allergic asthma. However, the effects of long-term treatment with omalizumab in this population haven't been well investigated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of omalizumab in children with uncontrolled severe asthma. METHODS: Thirty-eight Japanese children (aged 7-16 years) who completed the 24-week treatment core study were included in an uncontrolled extension study, in which treatment with omalizumab continued until the pediatric indication was approved in Japan (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01328886). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (92.1%) completed the extension study. The median exposure throughout the core and extension studies was 116.6 weeks (range, 46.9-151.1 weeks). The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, influenza, upper respiratory tract infection, and asthma. Serious adverse events developed in 10 patients (26.3%), but resolved completely with additional treatments. Incidence of adverse events didn't increase with extended exposure with omalizumab. Twenty-nine patients (76.3%) achieved completely- or well-controlled asthma compared with 9 patients (23.7%) at the start of the extension study. QOL scores, the rates (per year) of hospitalizations and ER visits were significantly improved compared with the baseline of the core study [39.0 vs 48.0 (median), p < 0.001 for QOL, 1.33 vs 0.16, p < 0.001 for hospitalization, 0.68 vs 0.15, p = 0.002 for ER visits]. Remarkably, the mean total IgE level showed a decreasing trend while exposure to omalizumab remained at steady-state. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with omalizumab is well-tolerated and effective in children with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma. No new safety findings were identified.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Omalizumab/administration & dosage , Omalizumab/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Omalizumab/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Allergol Int ; 64(4): 364-70, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26433533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab has demonstrated clinical benefits in children with moderate to severe allergic asthma. However, no studies have been performed in Japanese asthmatic children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy including free IgE suppression and safety of omalizumab in Japanese children with severe allergic asthma. The primary objective was to examine whether omalizumab decreases serum free IgE levels to less than 25 ng/ml (target level of suppression). METHODS: Thirty-eight Japanese children (6-15 years) with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (>200 µg/day fluticasone propionate or equivalent) and two or more controller therapies received add-on treatment with omalizumab in a 24-week, multicenter, uncontrolled, open-label study. RESULTS: The geometric mean serum free IgE level at 24 weeks was 15.6 ng/mL. Compared with baseline, total asthma symptom scores, daily activity scores and nocturnal sleep scores at 24 weeks were significantly improved. The rates of asthma exacerbation and hospitalization due to asthma were reduced by 69.2% and 78.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), versus baseline. Quality-of-life scores were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). In addition, 11 (28.9%) patients reduced the dose of any asthma controller medications. Thirty-six (94.7%) patients experienced at least one adverse event during the treatment period. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no new safety concerns were detected. No patients discontinued the study. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese children with severe allergic asthma, omalizumab decreased free IgE levels to less than 25 ng/mL. Omalizumab improved asthma control and was well-tolerated, as well.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/adverse effects , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/adverse effects , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/therapeutic use , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/immunology , Child , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Japan , Male , Omalizumab/administration & dosage , Omalizumab/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
Arerugi ; 64(6): 816-21, 2015 Jun.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26380912

ABSTRACT

We here report a 34-years old male who had nattou-(fermented-soybean) induced late-onset anaphylaxis following SCUBA diving to about 20 m in the ocean off a small remote Japanese island (Kuroshima, Okinawa). He had eaten nattou for breakfast at 7:30 am. He traveled by boat to the dive site, dove twice and then ate lunch at 12:30 on the diving boat (no nattou at lunch). After lunch at 14:30 he dove again (third dive of the day) during which time itchiness started. Back on the diving boat, urticarial was noticed. At 15:30, while washing his diving gear at the diving shop near the harbor, he fainted. A physician arrived on the scene at 15:45. Chest sound was clear and SpO2 was 98%, and blood pressure was 60/- mmHg. Intra-venous hydrocortisone was given, however, his recovery was not satisfactory. Then he was transferred to the Yaeyama Hospital by helicopter at 17:45. The examination of diving computer analysis reveals no sign of increased residual nitrogen, denying the possibility of decompression syndrome. Prick to prick test shows a strongly positive response to nattou. Nattou-induced late-onset anaphylaxis following SCUBA diving was suspected.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/etiology , Diving/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Glycine max/adverse effects , Adult , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Decompression , Humans , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Male
4.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 113(2): 209-216.e7, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24893766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that intestinal microbiota play an important role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) through induction of immunosuppression and immune tolerance; however, the exact underlying mechanism is unclear. Few studies to date have examined the effects of probiotics on adult-type AD. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis LKM512 on adult-type AD and the expression of metabolites that are known to be influenced by gut microbiota in fecal samples. METHODS: Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive LKM512 or a placebo and underwent medical examinations. Fecal microbiota were analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Metabolomic analysis was conducted to search for antipruritic metabolites produced by intestinal bacteria using feces derived from 3 patients whose itch scores had improved using capillary electrophoresis with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antipruritic effects of kynurenic acid were observed using AD-induced NC/Nga mice. RESULTS: LKM512 administration alleviated itch in AD patients compared with controls and improved the dermatology-specific quality-of-life scores when compared with the controls. Administration of LKM512 also increased the expression of the antipruritic and antinociceptive metabolite kynurenic acid (KYNA) in patients whose itch score had improved after LKM512 treatment. In mouse experiments, scratching behavior counts tended to be decreased by KYNA injection when compared with no treatment. CONCLUSION: LKM512 administration may exert antipruritic effects by increasing KYNA production. LKM512 could therefore be a potentially effective therapeutic candidate for the reduction of pruritus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: umin.ac.jp/ctr Identifier: UMIN000005695.


Subject(s)
Antipruritics/therapeutic use , Bifidobacterium/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Kynurenic Acid/therapeutic use , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Adult , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Animals , Antipruritics/pharmacology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunosuppression Therapy , Intestines/microbiology , Kynurenic Acid/pharmacology , Lactic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Lactic Acid/metabolism , Male , Metabolomics , Mice , Microbiota , Polyamines/metabolism , Probiotics/pharmacology , Pruritus/drug therapy , Pruritus/microbiology , Quality of Life
5.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 33(4): 362-9, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22856637

ABSTRACT

Venipuncture testing of adrenocortical function in asthmatic infants and young children receiving inhaled corticosteroids can raise cortisol levels and mask physiological responses. This study aimed to establish reference ranges for salivary cortisol levels and evaluate the safety and effects of jet-nebulized budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) on salivary cortisol levels and patient outcomes in infants and young children with mild or persistent asthma. Reference salivary cortisol levels were determined in healthy children aged 6 months to 4 years old. A 12-week multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label study was performed involving 53 age-matched asthmatic children who received either 0.5 mg/day of BIS or 40-60 mg/day of cromolyn sodium inhalation suspension (CIS) via compressor nebulizer. The effective measuring range of salivary cortisol concentration in asthmatic children was 0.12-3.00 micrograms/dL. The upper and lower limits of the reference range were 0.827 and 0.076 micrograms/dL, respectively. No significant difference was seen from baseline through week 12 in the CIS and BIS groups. BIS was safe in these patients, with no inhibitory effects on adrenocortical function. Salivary cortisol measurement offers a useful and accurate tool for testing adrenocortical function in infants and young children. Longer-term studies that incorporate testing of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are warranted to confirm our findings.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Hydrocortisone , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/drug effects , Pituitary-Adrenal System/drug effects , Saliva/chemistry , Administration, Inhalation , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/pharmacology , Budesonide/pharmacology , Child, Preschool , Cromolyn Sodium/administration & dosage , Cromolyn Sodium/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Hydrocortisone/standards , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/physiopathology , Infant , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Pituitary-Adrenal System/physiopathology , Reference Values , Treatment Outcome
6.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 149(3): 239-45, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19218816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by Japanese cedar pollens is a serious problem in Japan. Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, improves symptoms associated with SAR, but a study comprehensively investigating the clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacological effects of omalizumab re-treatment has not yet been conducted. METHODS: The open-label, 12-week study was carried out in 34 patients who had been treated with omalizumab in the core study conducted in the previous Japanese cedar pollen season. The study plan including study period, efficacy and safety endpoints, as well as dose regimen, was designed to be the same as in the core study. Omalizumab was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks based on the serum IgE level and body weight of each patient. RESULTS: Time course changes in daily nasal symptom medication scores as well as in daily ocular symptom medication scores throughout the pollen period were comparable with those in the omalizumab group in the core study. Serum free IgE levels decreased to below the target level in all patients and were equal to those in the omalizumab group in the core study. The adverse reaction profiles were similar to those in the core study. In addition, the overall incidence of drug-related adverse events and injection site reactions in the re-treatment study did not increase compared with those in the omalizumab group in the core study. There were no serious adverse events, and no anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab was effective and safe when consecutively readministered in the second Japanese cedar pollen season.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Cryptomeria/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Female , Humans , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Omalizumab , Placebos , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology
7.
Allergol Int ; 57(3): 205-9, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18724074

ABSTRACT

Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by Japanese cedar pollens is a substantial problem in Japan. Omalizumab, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, has already been proven to reduce symptoms associated with SAR. To investigate the safety and efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced SAR compared to placebo or anti-allergic drug, two randomized, double-blind studies were conducted in Japan. Omalizumab (150, 225, 300, or 375 mg) or placebo was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks based on serum total IgE and body weight at baseline. IPD was administered 300 mg per day through the season. Primary and all secondary efficacy variable scores were significantly lower in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group (P < .01) and IPD, Th2 cytokine inhibitor group (P < .01). Omalizumab was effective and safe in the treatment of SAR induced by Japanese cedar pollens. And the methods of increasing effects by combining omalizumab with antibody-specific immunotherapy are being considered. These strategy is more effective than immune-therapy alone.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Anti-Allergic Agents/immunology , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asthma/immunology , Cryptomeria/immunology , Drug Design , Humans , Japan , Omalizumab , Pollen/immunology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology
8.
Allergol Int ; 55(4): 379-86, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17130680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by Japanese cedar pollen is a substantial problem in Japan. Omalizumab, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, has already been proven to reduce symptoms associated with SAR. We investigated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced SAR compared to placebo. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 100 Japanese patients with a history of moderate-to-severe SAR induced by Japanese cedar pollens. Omalizumab (150, 225, 300, or 375mg) or placebo was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks based on serum total IgE and body weight at baseline. The primary efficacy variable was the mean of daily nasal symptom medication scores (sum of the daily nasal symptom severity score and daily nasal rescue medication score) during the treatment period. Secondary efficacy variables included the daily ocular symptom medication score and related variables. RESULTS: Primary and all secondary efficacy variable scores were significantly lower in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group (P < .01). Serum free IgE levels markedly decreased in the omalizumab group and were associated with clinical efficacy. The overall incidence of injection site reactions was higher in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group; however, the adverse reaction profile was similar between the two groups when excluding injection site reactions. No anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab was effective and safe in the treatment of SAR induced by Japanese cedar pollen.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Cryptomeria , Pollen/adverse effects , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Adult , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/adverse effects , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Double-Blind Method , Erythema/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Omalizumab , Pain/chemically induced , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...