Biocompatibility Considerations for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products and Other Drug--Device Combination Products.

Biocompatibility considerations have historically been important for orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs) and other drug-device combination products, because finished device components and packaging in these products are often in direct contact with formulation and the patient. The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) discusses, in this article, the current regulatory landscape associated with biocompatibility and how biocompatibility is typically assessed for OINDPs, including risk management considerations and navigation of regulatory requirements. The article also describes current challenges related to alignment of regulatory expectations, particularly for drug-device combination products, and proposes some questions and topics for further discussion with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders to help advance alignment. To further illustrate current challenges and industry approaches to meeting biocompatibility requirements, we also present results of an IPAC-RS benchmarking survey and case studies.

Considerations when deriving compound-specific limits for extractables and leachables from pharmaceutical products: Four case studies.

Leachables from pharmaceutical container closure systems are a subset of impurities that present in drug products and may pose a risk to patients or compromise product quality. Extractable studies can identify potential leachables, and extractables and leachables (E&Ls) should be evaluated during development of the impurity control strategy. Currently, there is a lack of specific regulatory guidance on how to risk assess E&Ls; this may lead to inconsistency across the industry. This manuscript is a cross-industry Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) consortium collaboration and follow-up to Broschard et al. (2016), which aims to provide further clarity and detail on the conduct of E&L risk assessments. Where sufficient data are available, a health-based exposure limit termed Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) may be calculated and to exemplify this, case studies of four common E&Ls are described herein, namely bisphenol-A, butylated hydroxytoluene, Irgafos® 168, and Irganox® 1010. Relevant discussion points are further explored, including the value of extractable data, how to perform route-to-route extrapolations and considerations around degradation products. By presenting PDEs for common E&L substances, the aim is to encourage consistency and harmony in approaches for deriving compound-specific limits.

European Regulatory Developments for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products.

Orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDP) are regulated in Europe via national (country) legislation and guidelines and/or legislation established in the European Union and resulting guidelines developed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Recent movement in EMA guidance and European Commission legislation implies potential significant changes in OINDP regulation. The UK exiting the European Union ("Brexit") has also raised a number of questions related to OINDP development and regulation in the region. The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) European outreach working group provides and overview and analysis of the current state of European regulatory activity for OINDP (International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) 2018).

Assessing safety of extractables from materials and leachables in pharmaceuticals and biologics - Current challenges and approaches.

Leachables from pharmaceutical container closure systems can present potential safety risks to patients. Extractables studies may be performed as a risk mitigation activity to identify potential leachables for dosage forms with a high degree of concern associated with the route of administration. To address safety concerns, approaches to toxicological safety evaluation of extractables and leachables have been developed and applied by pharmaceutical and biologics manufacturers. Details of these approaches may differ depending on the nature of the final drug product. These may include application, the formulation, route of administration and length of use. Current regulatory guidelines and industry standards provide general guidance on compound specific safety assessments but do not provide a comprehensive approach to safety evaluations of leachables and/or extractables. This paper provides a perspective on approaches to safety evaluations by reviewing and applying general concepts and integrating key steps in the toxicological evaluation of individual extractables or leachables. These include application of structure activity relationship studies, development of permitted daily exposure (PDE) values, and use of safety threshold concepts. Case studies are provided. The concepts presented seek to encourage discussion in the scientific community, and are not intended to represent a final opinion or "guidelines."

Materials in Manufacturing and Packaging Systems as Sources of Elemental Impurities in Packaged Drug Products: A Literature Review.

Elemental impurities in drug products can arise from a number of different sources and via a number of different means, including the active pharmaceutical ingredient, excipients, the vehicle, and leaching of elemental entities that are present in the drug product's manufacturing or packaging systems. Thus, knowledge about the presence, level, and likelihood of leaching of elemental entities in manufacturing and packaging systems is relevant to understanding how these systems contribute to a drug product's total elemental impurity burden. To that end, a joint team from the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) Consortium and the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) has conducted a review of the available literature on elemental entities in pharmaceutically relevant polymers and the presence of these elemental entities in material extracts and/or drug products. This review article contains the information compiled from the available body of literature and considers two questions: (1) What elemental entities are present in the relevant polymers and materials and at what levels are they present? (2) To what extent are these elemental entities leached from these materials under conditions relevant to the manufacturing and storage/distribution of solution drug products? Conclusions drawn from the compiled data are as follows: (1) Elemental entities are present in the materials used to construct packaging and manufacturing systems as these materials either contain these elemental entities as additives or are exposed to elemental entities during their production. (2) Unless the elemental entities are parts of the materials themselves (for example, SiO2 in glass) or intentionally added to the materials (for example, metal stearates in polymers), their incidental amounts in the materials are generally low. (3) When elemental entities are present in materials and systems, generally only a very small fraction of the total available amount of the entity can be leached under conditions that are relevant to packaged drug products. Thus, while sources of certain elemental impurities may be ubiquitous in the natural environment, they are not ubiquitous in materials used in pharmaceutical packaging and manufacturing systems and when they are present, they are not extensively leached under relevant conditions. The information summarized here can be utilized to aid the elemental impurity risk assessment process by providing the identities of commonly reported elements and data to support probability estimates of those becoming elemental impurities in the drug product. Furthermore, recommendations are made related to establishing elements of potential product impact for individual materials. LAY ABSTRACT: Extraneous impurities in drug products provide no therapeutic benefit and thus should be known and controlled. Elemental impurities can arise from a number of sources and by a number of means, including the leaching of elemental entities from drug product packaging and manufacturing systems. To understand the extent to which materials used in packaging systems contain elemental entities and the extent to which those entities leach into drug products to become elemental impurities, the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) and International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) Consortia have jointly performed a literature review on this subject. Using the compiled information, it was concluded that while packaging materials may contain elemental entities, unless those entities are intentional parts of the materials, the amounts of those elemental entities are generally low. Furthermore, generally only a very small fraction of the total available amount of the entity can be leached under conditions that are relevant to packaged drug products. Thus, risk assessment of sources of elemental impurities in drug products that may be related to materials used in pharmaceutical packaging and manufacturing systems can utilize the information and recommendations presented here.

Evaluation of extractables in processed and unprocessed polymer materials used for pharmaceutical applications.

Polymeric materials are often used in pharmaceutical packaging, delivery systems, and manufacturing components. There is continued concern that chemical entities from polymeric components may leach into various dosage forms, particularly those that are comprised of liquids such as parenterals, injectables, ophthalmics, and inhalation products. In some cases, polymeric components are subjected to routine extractables testing as a control measure. To reduce the risk of discovering leachables during stability studies late in the development process, or components that may fail extractables release criteria, it is proposed that extractables testing on polymer resins may be useful as a screening tool. Two studies have been performed to evaluate whether the extractables profile generated from a polymer resin is representative of the extractables profile of components made from that same resin. The ELSIE Consortium pilot program examined polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene, and another study evaluated polypropylene and a copolymer of polycarbonate and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. The test materials were comprised of polymer resin and processed resin or molded components. Volatile, semi-volatile, and nonvolatile chemical profiles were evaluated after headspace sampling and extraction with solvents of varying polarity and pH. The findings from these studies indicate that there may or may not be differences between extractables profiles obtained from resins and processed forms of the resin depending on the type of material, the compounds of interest, and extraction conditions used. Extractables testing of polymer resins is useful for material screening and in certain situations may replace routine component testing.

Controlled Extraction Studies Applied to Polyvinyl Chloride and Polyethylene Materials: Conclusions from the ELSIE Controlled Extraction Pilot Study.

The effective management of leachables in pharmaceutical products is a critical aspect of their development. This can be facilitated if extractables information on the materials used in a packaging or delivery system is available to assist companies in selecting materials that will be compatible with the drug product formulation and suitable for the intended use. The Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) materials working group developed and executed a comprehensive extraction study protocol that included a number of extraction solvents, extraction techniques, and a variety of analytical techniques. This was performed on two test materials, polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), that were selected due to their common use in pharmaceutical packaging. The purpose of the study was to investigate if the protocol could be simplified such that (i) a reduced number or even a single extraction technique could be used and (ii) a reduced number of solvents could be used to obtain information that is useful for material selection regardless of product type. Results indicate that, at least for the PVC, such reductions are feasible. Additionally, the studies indicate that levels of extractable elemental impurities in the two test materials were low and further confirm the importance of using orthogonal analytical detection techniques to gain adequate understanding of extraction profiles.

A risk-based approach to management of leachables utilizing statistical analysis of extractables.

To incorporate quality by design concepts into the management of leachables, an emphasis is often put on understanding the extractable profile for the materials of construction for manufacturing disposables, container-closure, or delivery systems. Component manufacturing processes may also impact the extractable profile. An approach was developed to (1) identify critical components that may be sources of leachables, (2) enable an understanding of manufacturing process factors that affect extractable profiles, (3) determine if quantitative models can be developed that predict the effect of those key factors, and (4) evaluate the practical impact of the key factors on the product. A risk evaluation for an inhalation product identified injection molding as a key process. Designed experiments were performed to evaluate the impact of molding process parameters on the extractable profile from an ABS inhaler component. Statistical analysis of the resulting GC chromatographic profiles identified processing factors that were correlated with peak levels in the extractable profiles. The combination of statistically significant molding process parameters was different for different types of extractable compounds. ANOVA models were used to obtain optimal process settings and predict extractable levels for a selected number of compounds. The proposed paradigm may be applied to evaluate the impact of material composition and processing parameters on extractable profiles and utilized to manage product leachables early in the development process and throughout the product lifecycle.

Perspectives on the PQRI Extractables and Leachables "Safety Thresholds and Best Practices" Recommendations for Inhalation Drug Products.

In 2006, the Product Quality Research Institute's (PQRI) Leachables and Extractables Working Group released a comprehensive and detailed recommendation document related to leachables and extractables for inhalation drug products. The document includes best pharmaceutical development practice recommendations regarding container closure/delivery system component composition and selection, controlled extraction studies, drug product leachables studies, and routine extractables testing for component release. Also included in the document are two safety-based thresholds for leachables in inhalation drug products, the qualification threshold (QT) and the safety concern threshold (SCT), the first such safety-based thresholds for leachables in any drug product type. A process was described for converting the SCT into an analytically useful threshold for leachables/extractables characterization, the analytical evaluation threshold (AET), with consideration of individual drug product dosing parameters and container closure system component characteristics. This commentary presents the history and evolution of this recommendation document starting from the propellant changeover (chlorofluorocarbons to hydrofluorocarbons) in metered dose inhaler drug products, which helped prompt interest in inhalation drug product leachables, through the work process of the PQRI group. The overall positive acceptance of the PQRI recommendations is discussed, along with a brief summary of regulatory initiatives influenced by the recommendations. Also presented and discussed are certain key issues and questions that have arisen since the recommendation document was released. The extension and application of best practice recommendations to other high risk drug product types (e.g., large and small volume parenterals, ophthalmics), led by the PQRI Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Product Working Group, is introduced and considered. LAY ABSTRACT: The recommendation document released by the Product Quality Research Institute's (PQRI) Leachables and Extractables Working Group in 2006 includes the first safety-based thresholds for leachables in any drug product type, along with comprehensive best practice recommendations for inhalation drug product pharmaceutical development related to extractables and leachables. The best practice recommendations encompass a number of important functional areas, including container closure/delivery system component composition and selection, controlled extraction studies, drug product leachables studies, and routine extractables testing for component release. This commentary presents the history and evolution of this recommendation document starting from the propellant changeover (chlorofluorocarbons to hydrofluorocarbons) in metered dose inhaler drug products, which helped prompt interest in inhalation drug product leachables, through the work process of the PQRI group. The overall positive acceptance of the PQRI recommendations is discussed, along with a brief summary of regulatory initiatives influenced by the recommendations. Also presented and discussed are certain key issues and questions that have arisen since the recommendation document was released. The extension and application of best practice recommendations to other drug product types (e.g., large- and small-volume parenterals, ophthalmics), led by the PQRI Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Product Working Group, is introduced and considered.

Best practices for extractables and leachables in orally inhaled and nasal drug products: an overview of the PQRI recommendations.

The Product Quality Research Institute Leachables and Extractables Working Group includes pharmaceutical development scientists representing industry, government, and academia. The Working Group was created and constituted to address scientific and regulatory questions concerning the pharmaceutical development process for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products (OINDP) related to organic extractables and leachables. This effort has resulted in the creation of a detailed "Recommendation Document", which was submitted to the U.S. FDA for consideration in September 2006. The recommendations include proposed safety and analytical thresholds for leachables and extractables, as well as detailed "best practice" recommendations for various aspects of the OINDP pharmaceutical development process, including: materials selection for OINDP container closure system components, Controlled Extraction Studies, Leachables Studies, and Routine Extractables Testing. The Working Group's processes and the detailed and comprehensive recommendations that resulted from those processes, demonstrate that the Product Quality Research Institute collaborative process can result in consensus science-based and data driven recommendations that could have a positive effect on patient care. It is anticipated that the Working Group's recommendations will also contribute to the new "Quality by Design" pharmaceutical development paradigm. This commentary summarizes the best practice recommendations within the context of an overall pharmaceutical development process.

Foreign particles testing in orally inhaled and nasal drug products.

The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) presents this paper in order to contribute to public discussion regarding best approaches to foreign particles testing in orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs) and to help facilitate development of consensus views on this subject. We performed a comprehensive review of industry experience and best practices regarding foreign particles testing in OINDPs, reviewed current guidances and techniques, and considered health and safety perspectives. We also conducted and assessed results of an industry survey on U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirements for foreign particles testing. We provide here a result of our review and survey: a summary of industry best practices for testing and controlling foreign particles in OINDPs and proposals for developmental characterization and quality control strategies for foreign particles. We believe that clear consensus-based recommendations and standards for foreign particles testing and control in OINDPs are needed. The proposals contained in this paper could provide a starting point for developing such consensus recommendations and standards.