Outcome determinants for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus.

PURPOSE: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea are rare injuries. Internal fixation with headless compression screws provides a stable construct facilitating early mobilisation. Our study aimed to identify the key determinants of both radiological and functional outcomes of patients with distal humerus coronal shear fractures treated with internal fixation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients with distal humerus coronal shear fractures who were treated surgically was done. Demographics, fracture morphology, time to surgery, operative details such as surgical approach and implant used, quality of reduction, time to union, and associated complications from hospital records. Radiological outcomes were assessed using plain radiographs, and the functional outcomes were by Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). RESULTS: Patients with anatomical reduction of the fracture had better functional outcomes and range of motion. The presence of posterior comminution of capitellum resulted in poorer outcomes (p = 0.03). Delayed presentation did not alter the outcome when the anatomical reduction was achieved. Myositis ossificans was noted in nine patients and non-union in five patients. Two patients developed avascular necrosis of the capitellum and arthritis of the elbow joint. CONCLUSION: Anatomical reduction and posterior comminution are the two key determinants of the functional outcome in these coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. Early mobilisation following a stable fixation is crucial in achieving a good outcome.

Management of open fractures: A narrative review.

Open fractures are an emergency where the principal aim of the treatment is to maximise the restoration of limb function while preventing the dreaded consequences of infection and non-union. The decision-making process for open injuries is influenced by a variety of criteria, such as patient age, injury features, systemic response, activity level, comorbidities, and functional requirements. A collaborative orthoplastic approach to treating these injuries is essential for minimizing complications and need to be considered as a single specialty in early and long-term management. It has been shown that early prophylactic systemic antibiotics, wound irrigation, aggressive debridement of contaminated and devitalized tissue, and appropriate fracture fixation decreases the complications in all grades of open fractures. The advantages of Gram-negative antibiotics, the use of local antibiotics, intraoperative wound cultures, the "fix and flap" approach, and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy are few of the treatment options that are still controversial. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive review and practice guidelines regarding the management of open fractures.

Should ulnar styloid be fixed following fixation of a distal radius fracture?

INTRODUCTION: Fracture of the base of the ulnar styloid has shown to have higher incidence of TFCC tears and DRUJ instability leading to nonunion and impaired function. Poorer functional outcomes of the distal radius fracture have been attributed to the untreated associated ulnar styloid fractures while some studies have shown no difference. Thus, the treatment remains controversial. However, it has been shown that fractures at the base of the ulnar styloid have a higher incidence of tears in the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and instability in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), which can lead to nonunion and impaired function. Despite this, there are currently no studies comparing the outcomes of surgically and conservatively treated patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the outcomes of intra-articular distal radius fractures associated with base of ulnar fracture treated with distal radius LCP fixation. The study included 14 patients who were treated surgically and 49 patients who were treated conservatively, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Radiological parameters such as union and amount of displacement, VAS score for ulnar-sided wrist pain, functional assessment using the modified Mayo score and the quick DASH questionnaire and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean scores for pain (VAS), functional outcomes (modified Mayo score), disability (QuickDASH score), range of motion, and non-union rate were found to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) between the surgically treated and conservatively treated groups. However, patients with non-union had statistically significant higher scores for pain (VAS), greater post-operative displacement of the styloid, poorer functional outcomes, and higher disability (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference in ulnar-sided wrist pain and functional outcomes between the surgically treated and conservatively treated groups, the conservatively treated cases had a higher risk of non-union, which can negatively impact functional outcomes. The amount of pre-operative displacement was found to be a key factor in predicting non-union and can be used as a guide for determining the management of this type of fracture.

Consistent Protocol-Based Management of Humerus Shaft Nonunion: An Analysis of 100 Cases.

Introduction: Humerus shaft nonunions are very disabling and challenging to treat. The current study aims to analyse the rate of union and the incidence of complications following a consistent protocol in treating humerus shaft nonunion. Methodology: We did a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with humerus shaft nonunion treated over an eight-year period from 2014 to 2021. The mean age was 42 years (range 18-75 years). There were 53 male and 47 female patients. The average time interval from injury to nonunion surgery was 23 months (range 3 months to 23 years). The series included 12 recalcitrant nonunions and 12 patients with septic nonunion. All patients underwent freshening of fracture edges to increase the contact surface area, stable fixation with a locking plate and intramedullary iliac crest bone grafting. Infective nonunions were treated in a staged manner, following a similar treatment protocol after the elimination of infection in the first stage. Results: Complete union was achieved in 97% of the patients with a single procedure. One patient achieved union after an additional procedure, while two patients were lost to further follow-up. The mean time to union was 5.7 months (range 3-10 months). Three patients (3%) had postoperative radial nerve palsy, which recovered completely within 6 months. Three patients (3%) had a superficial surgical site infection, while one patient (1%) developed a deep infection. Conclusion: Intramedullary cancellous autologous grafts combined with stable fixation by compression plating achieve a high union rate with minimal complications. Level of Evidence: III. Level of Clinical Care: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.

Temporary spacer rod and plate technique: a novel intraoperative technical tip for minimizing the docking site malalignment during bone transport for bone loss in Gustilo IIIb open tibial fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Distraction osteogenesis is a safe and reliable option for managing bone defects of the tibia following major open fractures. Even though the Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) is a popular option, it may result in malalignment, necessitating an additional procedure to correct the alignment. The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of a novel surgical technique in minimising malalignment. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a level 1 tertiary trauma centre consisting of 35 patients with primary bone loss following open tibia fractures. A uniplanar LRS frame was applied using a combined spacer rod with plate technique. Radiological assessment of docking site characteristics (translation, angulation) and functional assessment using ASAMI score was done. RESULTS: The mean distraction regenerate length was 8.4 ± 3.45 cm. At the docking site, 18 patients did not have any deformity, 13 had a minor deformity of ≤ 5°, 2 had a moderate deformity of 6°-10° and 2 with a severe deformity > 10°. Circumferential docking was seen in 88.5% (31/35). According to the ASAMI functional scoring, 13 patients had excellent outcomes, 19 had good, one had fair, and two had poor outcomes. Six patients had pin tract infections, three had deep infections, and 17 had a delayed union. Our study had a lower incidence of malalignment compared to similar studies in the literature. CONCLUSION: The use of this simple and economical intra-operative technique allowed for much higher precision in aligning the fracture ends, thus minimising the docking site malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. LEVEL OF CLINICAL CARE: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.