Dose Prescription to Isodose Lines in Static Multi-Beam Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors: Which Line Is Optimal?

This study investigated the appropriate dose prescription method in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors. Static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy is a mainstream treatment in Japan. Based on the hypothesis that dose prescription to lower isodose lines may improve planning target volume dose coverage and decrease doses to organs at risk, we investigated changes in dose-volume histograms with prescription to various isodose lines for planning target volume in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy. In all treatment plans, 45 Gy in 4 fractions were prescribed to 95% of the planning target volume. By adjusting the leaf margins of each beam, various prescription isodose lines encompassing 95% volume of the planning target volume were generated. The prescription isodose lines investigated were 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% lines relative to the maximum dose of each planning target volume. The conformity index, homogeneity index, mean lung dose, and V5-V40 of the lung were evaluated. The dose was calculated by the adaptive convolve algorithm. The conformity index was lowest in the 70% or 80% isodose plan. The mean lung doses and V10-V40 of the lung decreased steeply from the 90% to the 70% isodose plan, and was lowest in the 60% and 70% isodose plans. These indices increased in the 40% and 50% isodose plans. The optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy plans appeared to be dose prescription to the 60% or 70% isodose line. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the advantage of using this method clinically.

Biological effects of passive scattering and spot scanning proton beams at the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak in single cells and multicell spheroids.

PURPOSE: The present study investigated the biological effects of spot scanning and passive scattering proton therapies at the distal end region of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) using single cell and multicell spheroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate linear energy transfer (LET) values in passive scattering and spot scanning beams. The biological doses of the two beam options at various points of the distal end region of SOBP were investigated using EMT6 single cells and 0.6-mm V79 spheroids irradiated with 6 and 15 Gy, respectively, by inserting the fractions surviving these doses onto dose-survival curves and reading the corresponding dose. RESULTS: LET values in the entrance region of SOBP were similar between the two beam options and increased at the distal end region of SOBP, where the LET value of spot scanning beams was higher than that of passive scattering beams. Increases in biological effects at the distal end region were similarly observed in single cells and spheroids; biological doses at 2-10 mm behind the distal end were 4.5-57% and 5.7-86% higher than physical doses in passive scattering and spot scanning beams, respectively, with the biological doses of spot scanning beams being higher than those of passive scattering beams (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In single cells and spheroids, the effects of proton irradiation were stronger than expected from measured physical doses at the distal end of SOBP and were correlated with LET increases.