Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
Eur Radiol ; 27(2): 790-800, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27169574

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) regarding radiation, resolution, image noise, and image quality. METHODS: CBCT and 256-MDCT were compared based on three scan protocols: Standard-dose (≈24 mGy), reduced-dose (≈9 mGy), and low-dose (≈4 mGy). MDCT images were acquired in standard- and high-resolution mode (HR-MDCT) and reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). Spatial resolution in linepairs (lp) and objective image noise (OIN) were assessed using dedicated phantoms. Image quality was assessed in scans of 25 cadaver heads using a Likert scale. RESULTS: OIN was markedly higher in FBP-MDCT when compared to CBCT. IR lowered the OIN to comparable values in standard-mode MDCT only. CBCT provided a resolution of 13 lp/cm at standard-dose and 11 lp/cm at reduced-dose vs. 11 lp/cm and 10 lp/cm in HR-MDCT. Resolution of 10 lp/cm was observed for both devices using low-dose settings. Quality scores of MDCT and CBCT did not differ at standard-dose (CBCT, 3.4; MDCT, 3.3-3.5; p > 0.05). Using reduced- and low-dose protocols, CBCT was superior (reduced-dose, 3.2 vs. 2.8; low dose, 3.0 vs. 2.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using the low-dose protocol, the assessed CBCT provided better objective and subjective image quality and equality in resolution. Similar image quality, but better resolution using CBCT was observed at higher exposure settings. KEY POINTS: • The assessed CBCT device provided better image quality at lower doses. • Objective and subjective image quality were comparable using higher exposure settings. • CBCT showed superior spatial resolution in standard-dose and reduced-dose settings. • Modern noise-reducing tools are used in CBCT devices currently. • MDCT should be preferred for assessment of soft-tissue injuries and oncologic imaging.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Face/diagnostic imaging , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Cadaver , Head/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Phantoms, Imaging , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry
2.
Rofo ; 186(6): 567-75, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24458375

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of an advanced iterative reconstruction (IR) technique on subjective and objective image quality (IQ) in low-dose cardiac CT angiography (CCTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 datasets of prospectively triggered "step-and-shoot" CCTA scans acquired on a 256-slice CT scanner with optimized exposure settings were processed on a prototype IR system using filtered back-projection (FBP) and 4 levels of advanced IR (iDose4, Philips) providing incremental rates of IR (level 2, 4, 6, 7). In addition, the effects of different reconstruction kernels (semi-smooth [CB], standard with edge-enhancement [XCB]) and a "multi-resolution" feature [MR] to preserve the noise power spectrum were evaluated resulting in a total of n = 480 image sets. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were computed from regions of interest at 9 coronary locations. The subjective IQ was rated on a 4-point-scale with "classic" image appearance and noise-related artifacts as main criteria. RESULTS: At an effective dose of 1.7 ±â€Š0.7 mSv, the CNR significantly improved with every increasing level of IR (range: 14.2 - 27.8; p < 0.001) with the best objective IQ at the highest level of IR (level 7). The subjective IQ, however, was rated best at the medium level of IR (level 4) with minimal artifacts and a more "classic" image appearance when compared to higher IR levels. The XCB kernel provided better subjective ratings than CB (p < 0.05) and the MR feature further increased the IQ at a high level of IR. CONCLUSION: The objective IQ of low-dose CCTA progressively improves with an increasing level of IR. The best subjective IQ, however, is reached at medium levels of IR combined with an edge-enhancing kernel allowing for preservation of a "classic" image appearance suggesting application in the clinical routine. KEY POINTS: • iterative reconstruction (IR) improves image quality in low-dose coronary CTA• objective image quality (CNR) enhances with increasing level of IR• best subjective image quality is reached at medium level of IR• "multi-resolution" algorithm further improves image quality at a higher level of IR.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiation Dosage , Stents , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Contrast Media , Humans , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Rofo ; 185(8): 741-8, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23900941

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To intraindividually evaluate the potential of 4th generation iterative reconstruction (IR) on brain CT with regard to subjective and objective image quality. METHODS: 31 consecutive raw data sets of clinical routine native sequential brain CT scans were reconstructed with IR level 0 (= filtered back projection), 1, 3 and 4; 3 different brain filter kernels (smooth/standard/sharp) were applied respectively. Five independent radiologists with different levels of experience performed subjective image rating. Detailed ROI analysis of image contrast and noise was performed. Statistical analysis was carried out by applying a random intercept model. RESULTS: Subjective scores for the smooth and the standard kernels were best at low IR levels, but both, in particular the smooth kernel, scored inferior with an increasing IR level. The sharp kernel scored lowest at IR 0, while the scores substantially increased at high IR levels, reaching significantly best scores at IR 4. Objective measurements revealed an overall increase in contrast-to-noise ratio at higher IR levels, which was highest when applying the soft filter kernel. The absolute grey-white contrast decreased with an increasing IR level and was highest when applying the sharp filter kernel. All subjective effects were independent of the raters' experience and the patients' age and sex. CONCLUSION: Different combinations of IR level and filter kernel substantially influence subjective and objective image quality of brain CT.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Artifacts , Basal Ganglia Cerebrovascular Disease/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/standards , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Intracranial Hemorrhages/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Radiography , Radiology Information Systems , Reference Values , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
4.
Rofo ; 185(8): 749-57, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23749649

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the image quality of an iterative reconstruction (IR) technique in low-dose MDCT (LDCT) of the chest of immunocompromised patients in an intraindividual comparison to filtered back projection (FBP) and to evaluate the dose reduction capability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 chest LDCT scans were performed in immunocompromised patients (Brilliance iCT; 20-40 mAs; mean CTDIvol: 1.7 mGy). The raw data were reconstructed using FBP and the IR technique (iDose4™, Philips, Best, The Netherlands) set to seven iteration levels. 30 routine-dose MDCT (RDCT) reconstructed with FBP served as controls (mean exposure: 116 mAs; mean CDTIvol: 7.6 mGy). Three blinded radiologists scored subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity. Quantitative parameters including CT attenuation and objective image noise (OIN) were determined. RESULTS: In LDCT high iDose4™ levels lead to a significant decrease in OIN (FBP vs. iDose7: subscapular muscle 139.4 vs. 40.6 HU). The high iDose4™ levels provided significant improvements in image quality and artifact and noise reduction compared to LDCT FBP images. The conspicuity of subtle lesions was limited in LDCT FBP images. It significantly improved with high iDose4™ levels (> iDose4). LDCT with iDose4™ level 6 was determined to be of equivalent image quality as RDCT with FBP. CONCLUSION: iDose4™ substantially improves image quality and lesion conspicuity and reduces noise in low-dose chest CT. Compared to RDCT, high iDose4™ levels provide equivalent image quality in LDCT, hence suggesting a potential dose reduction of almost 80%.


Subject(s)
Image Enhancement/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Opportunistic Infections/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Anthropometry , Artifacts , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/standards , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Young Adult
5.
Rofo ; 185(2): 144-52, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23108902

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To study the effect of an automatic dose control (ADC) system with adequate noise characteristic on the individual perception of image noise and diagnostic acceptance compared to objectively measured image noise and the dose reductions achieved in a representative group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study two matched cohorts of 20 patients each were identified: a manual cohort with exposure settings according to body size (small - regular - large) and an ADC cohort with exposure settings calculated by the ADC system (DoseRight 2.0™, Philips Healthcare). For each patient, 12 images from 6 defined anatomic levels from contrast-enhanced scans of chest and abdomen/pelvis were analyzed by 4 independent readers concerning image noise and diagnostic acceptance on a five-point Likert scale and evaluated for objectively measured image noise. Radiation exposure was calculated from recorded exposure data. RESULTS: Use of the ADC system reduced the average effective dose for patients by 36 % in chest scans (3.2 vs. 4.9 mSv) and by 17 % in abdomen/pelvis scans (7.6 vs. 8.3 mSv). Average objective noise was slightly lower in the manual cohort (11.1 vs. 12.8 HU), correlating with a slightly better rating in subjective noise score (4.4 vs. 4.2). However, diagnostic acceptance was rated almost equal in both cohorts with excellent image quality (4.6 vs. 4.5). CONCLUSION: Use of an ADC system with adequate noise characteristic leads to significant reductions in radiation exposure for patients while maintaining excellent image quality.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiometry/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Young Adult
6.
Rofo ; 183(1): 60-7, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938882

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the performance and to provide more detailed insight into the characteristics and limitations of devices for automatic dose control (ADC) in CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive study on DoseRight 2.0, the ADC system provided by Philips for its Brilliance CT scanners, was conducted. Phantom tests were carried out on a 64-slice scanner (Brilliance 64) using assorted quality control (QC) phantoms that allowed verification of the basic specifications. If feasible, the findings were verified by model calculations based on known specifications. RESULTS: For all tests, the dose reductions and modulation characteristics fully met the values expected from the specifications. Adverse effects due to increased image noise were only moderate as a result of the "adequate noise system" design that employs comparatively gentle modulation, and the additional use of adaptive filtration. CONCLUSION: Simple tests with QC phantoms allow evaluation of the most relevant characteristics of devices for ADC in CT.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed/standards , Automation , Body Size , Environmental Exposure , Equipment Design , Humans , Noise , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
7.
Rofo ; 183(2): 154-62, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938883

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the performance and to provide more detailed insight into characteristics and limitations of devices for automatic dose control (ADC) in CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive study on DoseRight 2.0, the ADC system provided by Philips for its Brilliance CT scanners, was conducted with assorted tests using an anthropomorphic phantom that allowed simulation of the operation of the system under almost realistic conditions. The scan protocol settings for the neck, chest and abdomen with pelvis were identical to those applied in the clinical routine. RESULTS: Using the appropriate ADC functionalities, dose reductions equal 40% for the neck, 20% for the chest and 10% for the abdomen with pelvis. Larger dose reductions can be expected for average patients, since their attenuating properties differ significantly from the anthropomorphic phantom. Adverse effects due to increased image noise were only moderate as a consequence of the "adequate noise system" design and the complementary use of adaptive filtration. The results of specific tests also provided deeper insight into the operation of the ADC system that helps to identify the causes of suspected malfunctions and to prevent potential pitfalls. CONCLUSION: Tests with anthropomorphic phantoms allow verification of the characteristics of devices for ADC in CT under almost realistic conditions. However, differences in phantom shape and material composition require supplementary patient studies on representative patient groups.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Abdomen/radiation effects , Anthropometry , Filtration/instrumentation , Humans , Patient Positioning , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Software , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Thorax/radiation effects
8.
Eur Radiol ; 20(9): 2116-25, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20379820

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify radiation dose reduction in cardiac computed tomography (CT) using a prospectively triggered mode compared with a retrospective ECG-gated helical mode. METHODS: Absorbed organ doses in cardiac 64-row multidetector CT were quantified using an anthropomorphic male Alderson phantom with 74 thermoluminescence dosimeters. Three different imaging protocols were applied: retrospective ECG-gating, retrospective ECG-gating with additional ECG-pulsing, and a prospectively triggered mode. The measured organ doses were compared with dose estimation by a mathematical phantom. RESULTS: Compared with the retrospective ECG-gating mode, the mean relative organ doses were reduced by 44% using ECG pulsing and by 76% using the prospectively triggered mode. The range of dose savings varied from 34% to 49% using ECG pulsing and from 65% to 87% using the prospectively triggered mode. The effective dose was 16.5 mSv using retrospective gating, 9.2 mSv using retrospective gating with ECG pulsing and 4.0 mSv using the prospectively triggered mode. CONCLUSIONS: Our measurements confirm the high dose-saving potential of the prospectively triggered technique in cardiac CT. The reduction in the organ doses measured corresponds to estimates determined by the mathematical phantom. The effective dose calculated by the mathematical phantom was, in some cases, significantly lower than that calculated using the anthropomorphic phantom.


Subject(s)
Body Burden , Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques/methods , Coronary Angiography/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Tomography, Spiral Computed/methods , Humans , Male , Phantoms, Imaging , Prospective Studies , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiometry/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 34(2): 302-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20351525

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Image quality of chest and abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans was evaluated at different doses to assess the lowest value of x-ray dose at which the image quality was not being affected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using multislice CT (MSCT), 29 patients who submitted to follow-up examinations were examined using a combined MSCT protocol of the chest and the abdomen on 4-raw MSCT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). For each examination, approximately 120 mL of contrast agent (Bracco-Altana, Konstanz, Germany) was applied intravenously. The raw data were transferred to an external personal computer equipped with an image reconstruction software (CardioRecon 6; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) to simulate 5 different dose levels. To simulate them correctly, a milliampere second-dependent noise was added to every image, so that the changes in a current-time product could be imitated. The images were compared in consensus by 2 radiologists who were not informed about the technical scanning parameters, that is, dose parameters, and were graded in 4 different subcategories on a 1-to-5-point scale. For statistical analysis, the Friedman test was used. Additional evaluations for lesions smaller than 1.0 cm were performed and analyzed separately. RESULTS: For image noise, there was a significant change between 40 and 60 mA s. For lesion detection, there was no significant change. The contour of the small objects did not differ between 90, 60, and 40 mA s. However, a dose reduction to 30 mA s had a significant effect. The contrast did not differ between 90, 60, 40, and even down to 30 mA s. Only a maximal dose reduction to 20 mA s had a significant effect on the contrast. The level of noise was most sensitive to the current. Whereas a dose reduction to 60 mA s did not yet have a significant effect, there was a significant increase of noise at 40 mA s. CONCLUSIONS: The MSCT can be applied with a lower dose than that usually selected in examinations at present to follow-up and stage the oncological patients adequately.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Neoplasms/complications , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chi-Square Distribution , Contrast Media , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Iopamidol/analogs & derivatives , Male , Middle Aged , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Abdominal , Radiography, Thoracic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Software , Statistics, Nonparametric
10.
Eur Spine J ; 18(8): 1226-33, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19387703

ABSTRACT

Sacral insufficiency fractures can cause severe, debilitating pain to patients concerned. The incidence of this fracture type correlates with the appearance of osteoporosis in the elderly population. A polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement injection procedure called sacroplasty has been recently described as an optional method for the treatment of this fracture type. However, the correct cement placement in the complex anatomical structure of the sacrum is a surgical challenge. The aim of the study is to compare the precision, safety, and radiation exposure of standard multiplanar fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) guidance for PMMA application to the sacrum using both balloon-assisted sacroplasty and conventional sacroplasty. A controlled experimental investigation in a human cadaver trial has been performed. Two imaging and two application modalities to monitor percutaneous PMMA injection to the sacrum were examined. The application forms were randomized from side to side of the pelvis. We found less cement extravasation in the CT-guided groups, but also a significant higher radiation exposure (P < 0.05) by using CT guidance. The conventional fluoroscopy-guided sacroplasty revealed the shortest procedure time (incision to closure time) of all treatment groups (P < 0.01). These findings show no difference regarding cement extravasation between ballon-assisted and conventional sacroplasty. Further, in comparison to fluoroscopy-assisted technique, the CT-guided cement injection seems to decrease the risk of cement extravasation, irrespective of the use of an additional balloon assistance. However, we have to consider a greater radiation exposure using CT guidance. Further investigations will proof the suitability in the normal course of clinical life.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/methods , Neuronavigation/methods , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Sacrum/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Vertebroplasty/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Cadaver , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Osteoporosis/complications , Polymethyl Methacrylate/therapeutic use , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Vertebroplasty/instrumentation
11.
Rofo ; 181(6): 549-55, 2009 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19306239

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to optimize high-resolution MSCT chest protocols for the evaluation of symptomatic immunosuppressed patients with suspected pneumonia using a dose-simulating program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the MSCT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), 30 immunosuppressed patients with suspected pneumonia were examined with a low-dose HRCT of the chest (120 kV, 100 eff.mAs and collimation of 4 x 1 mm). A dose-simulating program was used to reconstruct the raw data at four different dose levels (70, 50, 35 und 25 mAs). For dose simulation for each mAs product, the correspondent noise level was added to the data. Images were generated with a slice thickness of 1 mm and 5 mm in the lung window. The images were then evaluated independently by two radiologists and graded on a scale of 1 to 3 points: 1 = no pneumonia, 2 = unclear, 3 = pneumonia. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). The actual dosage in mSv was calculated. The sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 30 patients, 7 had a normal chest finding and 23 had pneumonia. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 1.0 for every dosage and slice thickness. Infiltrates were detected correctly for all dosage levels. The sensitivity was 100 % for all dose levels and slice thicknesses. There was one false positive finding at 35 mAs and 1 mm slice thickness. At this dose level the specificity was reduced to 93 %. A reduction to 25 mAs had no influence on the detection of pneumonia. Thus, MSCT examinations of the chest can be performed with 25 mAs without missing the right diagnosis, resulting in an effective dose of 1.15 mSv (men), 1.5 mSv (women) and a CTDIvol of 2.5 mGy. CONCLUSION: For the evaluation of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients, MSCT examination of the chest can be performed with 25 mAs. Thus, radiation exposure was reduced to a quarter compared to the standard protocol.


Subject(s)
Body Burden , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/immunology , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Radiation Protection/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
12.
Rofo ; 179(12): 1264-71, 2007 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18004693

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Detailed anatomic information of the left atrium is necessary for securely performing radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation-triggering ectopies in the pulmonary vein ostia. In this study the impact of a preinterventionally acquired cardiac computed tomography (CT) on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Examinations of 54 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI were analyzed. In 27 patients a supplementary cardiac CT was obtained prior to PVI (CT group, 12 women, 15 men, 59.7+/-9.9 years of age): 16 x 1.5 mm collimation, 0.2 pitch, 120 kV tube voltage, 400 effective mAs. The fluoroscopy time, effective dose and quantity of radiofrequency (RF) pulses of the following catheter ablation were compared to 27 patients undergoing stand-alone PVI (11 women, 16 men, 62.0+/-9.9 years of age). Mann-Whitney tests served for statistical comparison. RESULTS: CT datasets were successfully integrated into the ablation procedure of each patient in the CT group. The mean quantity of RF pulses was significantly lower in the CT group (22.1+/-8.0 vs. 29.1+/-11.9, p=0.030), and a significant reduction of fluoroscopy time was found (41.8+/-12.0 min vs. 51.2+/-16.0 min, p=0.005). Effective doses of the catheter ablation differed in an equivalent dimension but altogether not significantly (14.9+/-10.0 mSv vs. 20.0+/-16.0 mSv, p=0.203). The mean additive effective dose of the cardiac CT was 8.5+/-0.3 mSv. CONCLUSION: CT-guided ablation of atrial fibrillation requires less fluoroscopy time than stand-alone PVI. Due to the multi-faceted dependency of individual fluoroscopy doses, a consistent reduction of the effective dose was not observed. Since supplementary CT constitutes an additive dose, optimized CT atriography needs to be designed in order to provide sufficient image quality while reducing X-ray exposure. The reduction in RF pulses implies an increase in the effectiveness and safety of catheter ablation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Fluoroscopy , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Veins/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
14.
Rofo ; 179(4): 373-9, 2007 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17385132

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Postprocessing offers the possibility of real-time creation of thickened slabs from a set of thin slices. This allows the interactive change from thick to thin slices for better evaluation of unclear lesions. As a result the clinical workflow of MSCT evaluation can be improved. However, to be able to apply this postprocessing software in the clinical routine, degradations in the image quality (compared to standard original reconstructed images) have to be avoided. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of thickened slabs from MSCT chest examinations that have either been directly reconstructed from the raw data or have been retrospectively generated via postprocessing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest MSCT examinations of 20 patients (mean age: 56 years) were performed on a 16-slice MSCT scanner (Mx8000IDT16, Philips, Best, Netherlands) using the following scan parameters: 120 kV, 94 effective mAs, 16 x 1.5 mm collimation, 512 x 512 matrix, field of view 371 x 371 mm, CTDIvol = 6.3 mGy, DLP = 210 mGyxcm). Slices with a thickness of 3 and 5 mm were generated for each examination both directly from the raw data and via postprocessing. Corresponding images from postprocessing and direct reconstruction (lung/soft tissue window) were evaluated by two radiologists with respect to 5 criteria on the basis of a five-point scale: organ structure, contour of small objects, contrast, image noise and artifacts. Differences between both data sets regarding image quality were assessed for each of the 5 criteria using a Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni correction. In addition, image noise was analyzed quantitatively in a region of interest in the aorta. RESULTS: For the lung and soft tissue window, both reviewers and all criteria, no differences in image quality were detected between the thickened slices obtained via direct reconstruction and the postprocessing method. In 96 % and 95 % of the cases images of the two reconstruction methods were graded identically for 3 mm and 5 mm slices. In the remaining 4 % and 5 %, the evaluations differed only by one point on the five-point scale. The median grade of the first reviewer was 1 and that of the second reviewer was 2. There were no differences in the quantitative analysis of image noise between both methods. CONCLUSION: The interactive creation of thickened slices is an effective tool for the evaluation of MSCT examinations. For the defined scan parameters in this study there were no differences in image quality between postprocessing methods (e. g. slab viewer) and direct image reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Thoracic/instrumentation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Software , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation
15.
Rofo ; 176(11): 1676-82, 2004 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15497087

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality of thin-section MSCT examinations of low-contrast objects such as liver lesions, and to find out whether a thin slice technique requires an increase in radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MSCT examinations of the liver were performed in the portal venous phase on a Volume Zoom Scanner (Siemens, Erlangen) with a collimation of 4 x 2.5 mm, 120 kV, 125 mAs and table speed of 12.5 mm. Forty small hypodense liver lesions with a mean size of 3 mm (1 to 8 mm) were reconstructed using a slice thickness of 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm. All lesions were evaluated for each slice thickness by 3 independent radiologists using a 5-point scale (excellent to poor) for the following 7 criteria: contrast, demarcation and contour of the lesion, image noise and quality, demarcation of liver veins and liver contour. The mean values of the reviewers' scores were calculated. The correlation of the three observers in the evaluation of the criteria was determined using the Kendall's Tau coefficient. RESULTS: The 3-mm thin sections were excellent in the evaluation of lesion detection, lesion contrast and lesion contour with a mean score of 1.4 compared to 4.1 for 10-mm sections. Concerning the criteria image quality and liver contour, thin sections achieved the best results in our series. Image noise was pronounced in thin sections but did not affect negatively the image analysis. Interrater agreement was 0.53 for the criterium image noise. CONCLUSION: Thin sections in MSCT examinations of low contrast objects such as liver lesions do not require an increase in radiation dose because the increase in image noise is compensated by improved lesion contrast.


Subject(s)
Liver Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Contrast Media , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Radiation Dosage
16.
Rofo ; 176(11): 1683-94, 2004 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15497088

ABSTRACT

In May 1998, the German "Concerted Action Dose Reduction in CT" was founded by all parties involved in CT. Its intention was to achieve a significant reduction of the radiation exposure caused by CT, a matter that has increasingly been considered a major challenge since the early nineties. As a result of a number of joint efforts, the essential preconditions have been established by now. The fifth anniversary of the Concerted Action gave rise for both retrospection and outlook on the tasks that have already been accomplished and those that still need to be done. For this purpose, a one-day symposium took place in Berlin on November 4, 2003. The contents of a total of 18 contributions will be outlined here in brief.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiometry , Reference Values , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
17.
Rofo ; 176(7): 1039-44, 2004 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15237348

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the radiation dose of whole-body multislice CT (MSCT) and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT in polytrauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The whole-body MSCT encompassing brain, neck and midface, chest, abdomen and pelvis was performed on a Somatom Volume Zoom (Siemens). Conventional radiography consisted of chest and cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine in two views as well as pelvis (Polymat, Siemens). Three combinations of organ specific CT were chosen: CT examination of (1) head and cervical spine, (2) head, cervical spine and chest, (3) head, cervical spine and abdomen. The effective doses of whole-body MSCT and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT were calculated. RESULTS: Effective doses were 20 mSv for whole-body MSCT, 2 mSv for conventional x-ray, and 5 mSv for combination (1), 8 mSv for combination (2) and (3) 16 mSv for combination (3) of the organ-specific CT. The ratio of radiation dose between whole-body MSCT and radiography was 10 : 1. This ratio was reduced to 3 : 1, 2 : 1 and 1 : 1 when a combination of radiography and CT was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body MSCT in polytrauma compared to conventional radiography with organ-specific CT induces a threefold increased dose in unfavorable situations and no increased dose in favorable situations. Nevertheless, routine use of whole-body MSCT should be critically evaluated and should be adapted to the clinical benefit.


Subject(s)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Organ Specificity , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Abdominal , Radiography, Thoracic , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Eur Radiol ; 14(7): 1275-84, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15034744

ABSTRACT

Dose assessment in computed tomography (CT) is challenging due to the vast variety of CT scanners and imaging protocols in use. In the present study, the accurateness of a theoretical formalism implemented in the PC program CT-EXPO for dose calculation was evaluated by means of phantom measurements. Phantom measurements were performed with four 1-slice, four 4-slice and two 16-slice spiral CT scanners. Firstly, scanner-specific nCTDIw values were measured and compared with the corresponding standard values used for dose calculation. Secondly, effective doses were determined for three CT scans (head, chest and pelvis) performed at each of the ten installations from readings of thermoluminescent dosimeters distributed inside an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and compared with the corresponding dose values computed with CT-EXPO. Differences between standard and individually measured nCTDIw values were less than 16%. Statistical analysis yielded a highly significant correlation (P < 0.001) between calculated and measured effective doses. The systematic and random uncertainty of the dose values calculated using standard nCTDIw values was about -9 and +/- 11%, respectively. The phantom measurements and model calculations were carried out for a variety of CT scanners and representative scan protocols validate the reliability of the dosimetric formalism considered-at least for patients with a standard body size and a tube voltage of 120 kV selected for the majority of CT scans performed in our study.


Subject(s)
Phantoms, Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Head/radiation effects , Humans , Pelvis/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Thorax/radiation effects , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
19.
Eur Radiol ; 13(8): 1979-91, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12687286

ABSTRACT

Multi-slice (MS) technology increases the efficacy of CT procedures and offers new promising applications. The expanding use of MSCT, however, may result in an increase in both frequency of procedures and levels of patient exposure. It was, therefore, the aim of this study to gain an overview of MSCT examinations conducted in Germany in 2001. All MSCT facilities were requested to provide information about 14 standard examinations with respect to scan parameters and frequency. Based on this data, dosimetric quantities were estimated using an experimentally validated formalism. Results are compared with those of a previous survey for single-slice (SS) spiral CT scanners. According to the data provided for 39 dual- and 73 quad-slice systems, the average annual number of patients examined at MSCT is markedly higher than that examined at SSCT scanners (5500 vs 3500). The average effective dose to patients was changed from 7.4 mSv at single-slice to 5.5 mSv and 8.1 mSv at dual- and quad-slice scanners, respectively. There is a considerable potential for dose reduction at quad-slice systems by an optimisation of scan protocols and better education of the personnel. To avoid an increase in the collective effective dose from CT procedures, a clear medical justification is required in each case.


Subject(s)
Tomography, Spiral Computed , Data Collection , Equipment Design , Germany , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , Tomography, Spiral Computed/methods
20.
Rofo ; 174(12): 1570-6, 2002 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12471531

ABSTRACT

CT-Expo is a novel MS Excel application for assessing the radiation doses delivered to patients undergoing CT examinations, based on computational methods that were used to analyze the data collected in the German survey on CT practice in 1999. The program enables the calculation of all dose quantities of practical value, such as axial dose free-in-air, weighted CTDI, dose-length product, effective dose and uterine dose. In contrast to existing programs for CT dose assessment, CT-Expo offers a number of unique features, such as gender-specific dose calculation for all age groups (adults, children, newborns), applicability to all existing scanner models including correction of scanner-specific influences, and the possibility of comparison with the results from the German CT survey on CT practice. Three different application modules offer free and standardized dose calculations as well as a comprehensive benchmarking section including guidance on dose optimization. The program is available as shareware in both German and English version. Additional information and a demo version free of charge can be requested via e-mail from the author's address stamm.georg@mh-hannover. de) or from the web page http://www.mh-hannover.de/kliniken/radiologie/str_04.html.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiation Protection , Reference Values , Sex Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Uterus/radiation effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...