ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve defects (PND) often cause lifelong physical disability, and the available treatment options are often not satisfactory. PND are usually bridged with an autologous nerve transplant or a nerve guidance conduit (NGC), when coaptation as preferred technique is not possible. The aim of this experimental study was to determine the effectiveness of a novel NGC for regeneration in the treatment of PND. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A conduit made of gelatin with an innovative interior structure was tested for the repair of a 6-mm gap versus direct microsurgical suture repair without gap. RESULTS: We found that bridging the defect with this conduit was as effective as direct microsurgical coaptation without a defect. CONCLUSIONS: This nerve conduit, effective in bridging neural defects, appears as an alternative to autologous nerve grafts, avoiding the problems related to nerve graft harvesting, host-donor differences in diameter, mismatches in number and pattern of fascicles, cross-sectional shape and area, and morbidity of the donor area.
Subject(s)
Nerve Regeneration , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/surgery , Prostheses and Implants , Sciatic Nerve/injuries , Animals , Atrophy , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Gait Analysis , Gelatin , Models, Animal , Muscles/innervation , Muscles/pathology , Muscles/physiology , Nerve Regeneration/physiology , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Prosthesis Design , Random Allocation , Sciatic Nerve/physiology , Swine , Swine, Miniature , TitaniumABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Even the most modern technology has failed to induce satisfactory functional regeneration of traumatically severed peripheral nerves. Delayed neural regeneration and in consequence, slower neural conduction seriously limit muscle function in the area supplied by the injured nerve. This study aimed to compare a new nerve coaptation system involving an innovative prosthesis with the classical clinical method of sutured nerve coaptation. Besides the time and degree of nerve regeneration, the influence of electrostimulation was also tested. METHODS: The sciatic nerve was severed in 14 female Göttingen minipigs with an average weight of 40.4 kg. The animals were randomized into 2 groups: One group received the new prosthesis and the other underwent microsurgical coaptation. In each group, according to the randomization a part of the animals received postoperative electrostimulation. Postoperative monitoring and the stimulation schedule covered a period of 9 months, during which axonal budding was evaluated monthly. RESULTS: The data from the pilot study indicate that results with the nerve prosthesis were comparable with those of conventional coaptation. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that implantation of the nerve prosthesis allows for good and effective neural regeneration. This new and simple treatment option for peripheral nerve injuries can be performed in any hospital with surgical facilities as it does not involve the demanding microsurgical suture technique that can only be performed in specialized centers.
