Efficacy and safety of adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysms clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebral aneurysms in complex anatomical locations and intraoperative rupture can be challenging. Many methods to reduce blood flow can facilitate its exclusion from the circulation. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of using adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing, and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysm clipping. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies documenting the use of adenosine, rapid ventricular pacing, and hypothermia in cerebral aneurysm clipping and were included in this single-arm meta-analysis. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included neurological outcomes by mRs and GOS, and cardiac outcomes. We evaluated the risk of bias using ROBIN-I, a tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. OpenMetaAnalyst version 2.0 was used for statistical analysis and I2 measured data heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was defined as an I2 > 50%. RESULTS: Our systematic search yielded 10,100 results. After the removal of duplicates and exclusion by title and abstract, 64 studies were considered for full review, of which 29 were included. The overall risk of bias was moderate. The pooled proportions of the adenosine analysis for the different outcomes were: For the primary outcome: 11,9%; for perioperative arrhythmia: 0,19%; for postoperative arrhythmia: 0,56%; for myocardial infarction incidence: 0,01%; for follow-up good recovery (mRs 0-2): 88%; and for neurological deficit:14.1%. In the rapid ventricular pacing analysis, incidences were as follows: peri operative arrhythmia: 0,64%; postoperative arrhythmia: 0,3%; myocardial infarction: 0%. In the hypothermia analysis, the pooled proportion of 30-day mortality was 11,6%. The incidence of post-op neurological deficits was 35,4% and good recovery under neurological analysis by GOS was present in 69.2%. CONCLUSION: The use of the three methods is safe and the related complications were very low. Further studies are necessary, especially with comparative analysis, for extended knowledge.

Is time really brain in stroke therapy?: A meta-analysis of mechanical thrombectomy up to 155 h post ictus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been established as the gold standard of treatment for patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) who present up to 6 h after the onset of the stroke. Recently, the DEFUSE-3 and DAWN trials established the safety of starting the MT procedure up to 16 and 24 h after the patient was last seen well, respectively. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and functional effects of thrombectomy in individuals with AIS detected at a late stage (> 24 h). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were thoroughly searched for research on MT in patients in the extremely late time window after AIS. The primary outcomes were symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, 90-day mortality, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b-3, and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. RESULTS: Our study included fifteen studies involving a total of 1,221 patients who presented with AIS and an extended time window. The primary outcome of interest was the favorable functional outcome, mRS 0-2 at 90 days. The pooled proportion for this outcome was 45% (95% confidence interval 34-58%). Other outcomes included the TICI 2b or 3 (successful recanalization), which was reported in 12 studies and had a 79% incidence in the study population (95% CI 68-87%). Complications included: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), which revealed an incidence of 7% in the study population (95% CI 5-10%); and 90-day mortality, which reported a 27% incidence (95% CI 24-31%). In addition, we conducted a comparative analysis between endovascular treatment and standard medical therapy. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that supports the need of further randomized and prospective clinical trials to better assess the effectiveness and safety of MT in these patients.

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Swallowing is a complex function that can be disrupted after stroke. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation therapy that recently has been tested to treat stroke-related dysphagia. METHODS: The authors performed a search in the literature to review the described evidence of the use of tDCS in dysphagia after stroke. Three electronic databases were searched. The risk of bias evaluation was carried out through the RoB-2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was also implemented. RESULTS: Of 265 articles, only nine studies were included in this review. The most common location of the tDCS stimulation was the unaffected hemisphere (44%). Regarding the outcome measure, the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) was the most commonly used (55%). However, due to the high heterogeneity of the protocols, and considering the differences between the types of stroke, the authors opted not to perform a metanalysis. Instead, a systematic review with a thorough analysis of each individual study and the impact of the differences to the outcomes was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: The final considerations are that even though the majority of studies described benefits from tDCS in post-stroke dysphagia, as they present too many methodological differences, it is not possible to compare them. In addition, many articles included patients with less than 6 months after stroke, which is an important bias as the swallowing function can be recovered spontaneously within this period, turning the certainty of the evidence really low.

Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pituitary adenomas, benign tumors, can lower quality of life. Pituitary adenomas that invade the medial wall and cavernous sinus (CS) indicate tumor recurrence and partial surgical excision. Despite the cavernous sinus's complexity and risks, new research has improved the surgical procedure and made excision safer. This comprehensive review and single-arm meta-analysis evaluates endocrinological remission and resection rates in pituitary adenomas to determine the benefits and risks of MWCS resection. METHODS: Databases were systematically searched for studies documenting the resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus. The primary outcome was endocrinological remission in patients who underwent resection of the MWCS. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of endocrinological remission (ER) was 63.3%. The excision of MWCS pooled a gross total resection (GTR) proportion of 72.9%. Finally, ICA injury attained a pooled ratio of 0.5%, indicating minimal morbidity in the procedure. CONCLUSION: The cavernous sinus was ruled out, proving the MWCS excision is safe. Limiting population selection to Knosp 3A or lower enhanced GTR frequencies and lowered recurrence, according to subgroup analyses. This meta-analysis shows that MWCS resection can be a beneficial treatment option for pituitary tumors, when there is no macroscopic medial wall invasion and careful patient selection is done, especially for GH- and ACTH-producing tumors that can cause life-threatening metabolic changes.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown that dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are effective in the treatment of chronic insomnia. However, the superiority of one particular DORA over the others remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different DORAs in patients with chronic insomnia. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for RCTs that compared DORA with placebo in patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder. We pooled outcomes for wake time after sleep onset (WASO), latency to persistent sleep (LPS), total sleep time (TST), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: We included 10 RCTs with 7,806 patients, 4,849 of whom received DORAs as the intervention. Overall, we found that DORAs were associated with the improvement of all analyzed efficacy outcomes. Concerning TST, an apparent dose-dependent pattern was noticed, with higher doses relating to a longer TST. Lemborexant 10mg provided the largest reduction in WASO (at month 1) in minutes (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -25.40; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = -40.02--10.78), followed by suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = -25.29; 95%CI = -36.42--14.15), which also appeared to provide the largest decrease in long-term WASO (SMD = -23.70; 95%CI = -35.89--11.51). The most frequent AEs were somnolence, nasopharyngitis, and headache, with rates of up to 14.8%. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DORAs are associated with greater efficacy when compared with placebo in the treatment of insomnia, a complex 24-hour sleep disorder. Additionally, dosing might play an important role in the management of chronic insomnia.

ANTECEDENTES: Inúmeros ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) têm demonstrado que os antagonistas duais do receptor de orexina (dual orexin receptor antagonists, DORAs, em inglês) são eficazes no tratamento da insônia. Contudo, restam dúvidas quanto à superioridade de um DORA com relação aos outros. OBJETIVO: Realizar uma meta-análise em rede para avaliar a eficácia de diferentes DORAs em pacientes com insônia. MéTODOS: Foram feitas buscas nas bases de dados Medline, Embase e Cochrane Central por ECRs que comparassem DORAs e placebo em pacientes ≥ 18 anos de idade com diagnóstico de insônia. Os seguintes desfechos foram selecionados: tempo desperto após o início do sono (wake time after sleep onset, WASO, em inglês), latência para o sono persistente (latency to persistent sleep, LPS, em inglês), tempo total de sono (total sleep time, TST, em inglês), e efeitos adversos (EAs). RESULTADOS: Incluímos 10 ensaios clínicos com 7,806 pacientes, 4,849 dos quais receberam DORAs como intervenção. Os DORAs foram associados à melhoria de todos os desfechos de eficácia analisados. Em relação ao TST, um aparente padrão de dependência da dose foi identificado, com doses maiores se associando a um maior TST. Lemborexant 10 mg proporcionou a maior redução em WASO (no primeiro mês) em minutos (diferença padronizada das médias [standardized mean difference, [SMD], em inglês) = -25.40; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%] = -40.02­-10.78), seguido de suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = -25.29; IC95% = -36.42­-14.15), o qual também proporcionou a maior diminuição em WASO no longo prazo (SMD = -23.70; IC95% = -35.89­-11.51). Os EAs mais frequentes foram sonolência, nasofaringite e cefaleia, com taxas de até 14.8%. CONCLUSãO: Nossos resultados sugerem que os DORAs estão associados a uma maior eficácia quando comparados com placebo no tratamento da insônia, um complexo transtorno do sono de 24 horas. Além disso, a dosagem pode desempenhar um papel importante no manejo da insônia crônica.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: systematic review and network meta-analysis / Antagonistas duais do receptor de orexina para o tratamento da insônia: revisão sistemática e metanálise em rede

Abstract Background Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown that dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are effective in the treatment of chronic insomnia. However, the superiority of one particular DORA over the others remains unclear. Objective To perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different DORAs in patients with chronic insomnia. Methods The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for RCTs that compared DORA with placebo in patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder. We pooled outcomes for wake time after sleep onset (WASO), latency to persistent sleep (LPS), total sleep time (TST), and adverse events (AEs). Results We included 10 RCTs with 7,806 patients, 4,849 of whom received DORAs as the intervention. Overall, we found that DORAs were associated with the improvement of all analyzed efficacy outcomes. Concerning TST, an apparent dose-dependent pattern was noticed, with higherdoses relating to a longerTST. Lemborexant 10mg provided the largest reduction in WASO (at month 1) in minutes (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −25.40; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = −40.02- −10.78), followed by suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = −25.29; 95%CI = −36.42- −14.15), which also appeared to provide the largest decrease in long-term WASO (SMD = −23.70; 95%CI = −35.89- −11.51). The most frequent AEs were somnolence, nasopharyngitis, and headache, with rates of up to 14.8%. Conclusion Our results suggest that DORAs are associated with greater efficacy when compared with placebo in the treatment of insomnia, a complex 24-hour sleep disorder. Additionally, dosing might play an important role in the management of chronic insomnia.

Resumo Antecedentes Inúmeros ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) têm demonstrado que os antagonistas duais do receptor de orexina (dual orexin receptor antagonists, DORAs, em inglês) são eficazes no tratamento da insônia. Contudo, restam dúvidas quanto à superioridade de um DORA com relação aos outros. Objetivo Realizar uma meta-análise em rede para avaliar a eficácia de diferentes DORAs em pacientes com insônia. Métodos Foram feitas buscas nas bases de dados Medline, Embase e Cochrane Central por ECRs que comparassem DORAs e placebo em pacientes ≥ 18 anos de idade com diagnóstico de insônia. Os seguintes desfechos foram selecionados: tempo desperto após o início do sono (wake time after sleep onset, WASO, em inglês), latência para o sono persistente (latency to persistent sleep, LPS, em inglês), tempo total de sono (total sleep time, TST, em inglês), e efeitos adversos (EAs). Resultados Incluímos 10 ensaios clínicos com 7,806 pacientes, 4,849 dos quais receberam DORAs como intervenção. Os DORAs foram associados à melhoria de todos os desfechos de eficácia analisados. Em relação ao TST, um aparente padrão de dependência da dose foi identificado, com doses maiores se associando a um maior TST. Lemborexant 10 mg proporcionou a maior redução em WASO (no primeiro mês) em minutos (diferença padronizada das médias [standardized mean difference, [SMD], em inglês) = −25.40; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%] = −40.02- −10.78), seguido de suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = −25.29; IC95% = −36.42- −14.15), o qual também proporcionou a maior diminuição em WASO no longo prazo (SMD = −23.70; IC95% = −35.89- −11.51). Os EAs mais frequentes foram sonolência, nasofaringite e cefaleia, com taxas de até 14.8%. Conclusão Nossos resultados sugerem que os DORAs estão associados a uma maior eficácia quando comparados com placebo no tratamento da insónia, um complexo transtorno do sono de 24 horas. Além disso, a dosagem pode desempenhar um papel importante no manejo da insónia crônica.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Erenumab in Patients with Migraine: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several studies on use of erenumab for migraine treatment have been published over recent years. However, its long-term safety and effectiveness have not been consistently established in the literature yet. We aimed to perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the long-term safety and effectiveness of erenumab for the treatment of migraine headaches. METHODS: Long-term follow-up was defined as ≥ 1 year. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to 14 June 2022 for studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, comprising 3574 patients, were included. The total follow-up period ranged from 48 to 268 weeks (i.e., 1 year to 5.6 years). Pooled estimate rates for all adverse events (AEs) were 63% (95% CI 46-78); for serious AEs, 3% (95% CI 1-7); and for AEs leading to discontinuation of erenumab, 3% (95% CI 2-5). Reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) was -6.98 (95% CI -8.90 to -5.05) and in migraine-specific medication days (MSMDs) was - 6.09 (95% CI - 9.43 to - 2.75). More than half (57%; 95% CI 51-63) and around one-third (35%; 95% CI 28-42) of patients presented with reductions of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% in MMDs, respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score was decreased by -9.68 points (95% CI - 12.03 to - 7.34). Nine studies were considered of poor methodological quality and five of fair quality. CONCLUSIONS: Erenumab has a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of serious AEs, and sustained efficacy over ≥1 year of follow-up in the treatment of migraine.

Prophylactic antiseizure drugs for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is concern that recommendations on prophylactic antiseizure drugs (PASDs) for patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) are biased by studies using older drugs and no electrographic monitoring. AIMS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether PASDs in patients with sICH reduced seizure occurrence and improved functional outcomes. We included analyses of newer trials, newer antiseizure drugs, and effectiveness in patients with consistent electrographic monitoring. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception until 12 August 2022, to identify studies with patients with sICH treated with PASDs, regardless of study design. The studied outcomes were functional status and occurrence of seizures. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included, including 6742 patients. Risk of bias was low overall. There was no effect of PASD on seizure occurrence overall (odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.15), but they were associated with reduced occurrence in studies with electrographic monitoring (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.70). There was no effect of PASDs on functional outcomes (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.91-1.47) or mortality (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.11). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antiseizure medications after sICH reduce seizures in studies with electroencephalogram monitoring in high-risk patients. However, this benefit did not reflect in the improvement of functional outcomes, even in studies with newer, less toxic, antiseizure drugs.