Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho ; 108(11): 1110-3, 2005 Nov.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16359006

ABSTRACT

The bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) is an implantable bone-conduction device that vibrates the skull directly via a surgically implanted titanium screw behind the ear. The BAHA has advantages for patients with aural atresia or chronic ear drainage, who cannot wear air-conduction hearing aids. We compared the function of BAHA to conventional bone and air-conduction hearing aids based on functional gain and speech discrimination tests in quiet and noisy environments in 2 patients with chronic ear problems. All expressed a clear preference for the BAHA over conventional bone-conduction hearing aids. The BAHA and air-conduction hearing aid provided similar audiological performance when the functional gain of each hearing aid coincided. As the air-bone gap widens, however, audiological performance with the BAHA showed an evident preference, indicating that the width of the air-bone gap is of some help in BAHA preference compared to air-conduction hearing aids.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold/physiology , Bone Conduction/physiology , Hearing Aids/standards , Prosthesis Implantation , Aged , Audiometry , Auditory Perception , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Speech Discrimination Tests
2.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 67(10): 1099-104, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14550964

ABSTRACT

Our purpose was to evaluate a two-stage newborn hearing screening program using automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) before discharge and to describe our follow-up program. This study used 4085 infants born in the Seirei-Hamamatsu and Mikatahara General Hospitals during a 2-year period. The initial screening test was performed 2 or 3 days after birth at an intensity of 35 dBnHL. For the infants who were referred from this test, the re-screening test was performed 5 or 6 days after birth. Diagnostic work-up with auditory brainstem response (ABR), otoacoustic emissions (OAE), and a conditioned orientation reflex audiometry (COR) test were performed by the age of 3-6 months. The referral rate was 1.20% (49/4085 infants) in the first test and 0.71% (29/4085 infants) in the two-stage screening. The two-stage screening procedure was able to reduce the false-positive rate from 0.83 to 0.34%. The incidence of bilateral and unilateral congenital hearing loss diagnosed by ABR was 8/4085 (0.20%) infants and 7/4085 (0.17%) infants, respectively. One infant with congenital cytomegalovirus infection, who passed the two-stage AABR tests, was diagnosed with hearing loss 1 month after birth, using ABR. The two-stage measurement of AABR is effective and time efficient due to significant decreases in the referral rate and the false-positive rate.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/methods , Audiometry , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Conditioning, Classical/physiology , False Positive Reactions , Hearing Loss/congenital , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Japan , Orientation/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...