ABSTRACT
This study focuses on the important question whether brain activity recorded from anesthetized, paralyzed animals is comparable to that recorded from awake, behaving ones. We compared neuronal activity recorded from the caudate nucleus (CN) of two halothane-anesthetized, paralyzed and two awake, behaving cats. In both models, extracellular recordings were made from the CN during static and dynamic visual stimulation. The anesthesia was maintained during the recordings by a gaseous mixture of air and halothane (1.0%). The behaving animals were trained to perform a visual fixation task. Based on their electrophysiological properties, the recorded CN neurons were separated into three different classes: phasically active (PANs), high firing (HFNs), and tonically active (TANs) neurons. Halothane anesthesia significantly decreased the background activity of the CN neurons in all three classes. The anesthesia had the most remarkable suppressive effect on PANs, where the background activity was consistently under 1 spike/s. The analysis of these responses was almost impossible due to the extremely low activity. The evoked responses during both static and dynamic visual stimulation were obvious in the behaving cats. On the other hand, only weak visual responses were found in some neurons of halothane anesthetized cats. These results show that halothane gas anesthesia has a marked suppressive effect on the feline CN. We suggest that for the purposes of the visual and related multisensory/sensorimotor electrophysiological exploration of the CN, behaving animal models are preferable over anesthetized ones.
Subject(s)
Action Potentials/drug effects , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Caudate Nucleus/drug effects , Halothane/pharmacology , Wakefulness/drug effects , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Cats , Caudate Nucleus/physiology , Neurons/drug effects , Neurons/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Visual Pathways/drug effects , Visual Pathways/physiology , Wakefulness/physiologyABSTRACT
Beside its motor functions, the caudate nucleus (CN), the main input structure of the basal ganglia, is also sensitive to various sensory modalities. The goal of the present study was to investigate the effects of visual stimulation on the CN by using a behaving, head-restrained, eye movement-controlled feline model developed recently for this purpose. Extracellular multielectrode recordings were made from the CN of two cats in a visual fixation paradigm applying static and dynamic stimuli. The recorded neurons were classified in three groups according to their electrophysiological properties: phasically active (PAN), tonically active (TAN) and high-firing (HFN) neurons. The response characteristics were investigated according to this classification. The PAN and TAN neurons were sensitive primarily to static stimuli, while the HFN neurons responded primarily to changes in the visual environment i.e. to optic flow and the offset of the stimuli. The HFNs were the most sensitive to visual stimulation; their responses were stronger than those of the PANs and TANs. The majority of the recorded units were insensitive to the direction of the optic flow, regardless of group, but a small number of direction-sensitive neurons were also found. Our results demonstrate that both the static and the dynamic components of the visual information are represented in the CN. Furthermore, these results provide the first piece of evidence on optic flow processing in the CN, which, in more general terms, indicates the possible role of this structure in dynamic visual information processing.
Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/physiology , Caudate Nucleus/cytology , Caudate Nucleus/physiology , Fixation, Ocular/physiology , Neurons/cytology , Animals , Cats , Optic Flow/physiology , Photic StimulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anesthetized, paralyzed domestic cats are often used as model organisms in visual neurophysiology. However, in the last few decades, behaving animal models have gathered ground in neurophysiology, due to their advantages over anesthetized, paralyzed models. NEW METHOD: In the present study a new, behaving, awake feline model is described, which is suitable for chronic visual electrophysiological recordings. Two trained, head- fixed cats were suspended in a canvas harness in a specially designed stand. The animals had been trained to fixate the center of a monitor during static and dynamic visual stimulation. Eye movements were monitored with implanted scleral coil in a magnetic field. Cell-level activity was recorded with eight electrodes implanted in the caudate nucleus. RESULTS: Our two trained cats could maintain accurate fixation, even during optic flow stimulation, in an acceptance window of ±2.5° and ±1.5°, respectively. The model has yielded accurate recordings for over two years. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): To our knowledge, this is the first awake, behaving feline model with rigorous eye movement control for chronic, cell-level visual electrophysiological recordings, which has actually proven to work during a longer period. CONCLUSIONS: The new model is optimal for chronic visual electrophysiological recordings in the awake, behaving domestic cat.