ABSTRACT
The cone-beam CT (CBCT), which is acquired using an on-board imager (OBI) attached to a linear accelerator, is used effectively in the verification of setup accuracy for lung radiation surgery. In this study, the respiratory organ motional effect on the CBCT was evaluated with a properly devised phantom system, and the level of possible error in conditions of a real clinical process was assessed. In a comparison study between the CBCT in static status and CBCT images acquired in 20 different motional cases, we confirmed that the image quality and information of CBCT were degraded, with an increase of motional ranges in the region of inhomogeneous structures. The 4D-CT MIP (50 approximately 55%) for the planning of lung radiation surgery and the 4D-CT MIP (full phase) were compared with CBCT in the various motional cases for the evaluation of the influence of the motional effect on CBCT in the process of the setup error correction. The average ratio of relative difference between plan CT: 4D-CT MIP (50% approximately 55%) and CBCT was 5.79% and between plan CT: 4D-CT MIP (50% approximately 55%) and 4D-CT MIP (full phase) was 42.95% in the phantom study. In the analysis of clinical cases of lung radiation surgery, the gross tumor volumes were compared in each CT image. The average ratio of relative difference between plan CT: 4D-CT MIP (50 approximately 55%) and CBCT was 10.72% and between plan CT: 4D-CT MIP (50 approximately 55%) and 4D-CT MIP (full phase) was 28.19%. These results showed that, although a respiratory organ motional effect on CBCT introduced variation in image quality, the error as a result of this variation could be estimated relatively low in the setup error correction for a gated-lung radiation surgery when the planning was performed in 4D-CT MIP (50 approximately 55%), which already included a related signal of motional effect.
