Allometric Scaling Rules of the Cerebellum in Galliform Birds.

Although the internal circuitry of the cerebellum is highly conserved across vertebrate species, the size and shape of the cerebellum varies considerably. Recent comparative studies have examined the allometric rules between cerebellar mass and number of neurons, but data are lacking on the numbers and sizes of Purkinje and granule cells or scaling of cerebellar foliation. Here, we investigate the allometric rules that govern variation in the volumes of the layers of the cerebellum, the numbers and sizes of Purkinje cells and granule cells and the degree of the cerebellar foliation across 7 species of galliform birds. We selected Galliformes because they vary greatly in body and brain sizes. Our results show that the molecular, granule and white matter layers all increase in volume at the same rate relative to total cerebellum volume. Both numbers and sizes of Purkinje cells increased with cerebellar volume, but numbers of Purkinje cells increased at a much faster rate than size. Granule cell numbers increased with cerebellar volume, but size did not. Sizes and numbers of Purkinje cells as well as numbers of granule cells were positively correlated with the degree of cerebellar foliation, but granule cell size decreased with higher degrees of foliation. The concerted changes among the volumes of cerebellar layers likely reflects the conserved neural circuitry of the cerebellum. Also, our data indicate that the scaling of cell sizes can vary markedly across neuronal populations, suggesting that evolutionary changes in cell sizes might be more complex than what is often assumed.

Comparison of estimates of neuronal number obtained using the isotropic fractionator method and unbiased stereology in day old chicks (Gallus domesticus).

BACKGROUND: The relative size and neuronal density of brain regions are important metrics in both comparative and experimental studies in neuroscience. Consequently, it is imperative to have accurate, reliable and reproducible methods of quantifying cell number. NEW METHOD: The isotropic fractionator (IF) method estimates the number of neurons and non-neurons in the central nervous system by homogenizing tissue into discrete nuclei and determining the proportion of neurons from non-neurons using immunohistochemistry (Herculano- Herculano-Houzel and Lent, 2005). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: One of the advantages of IF is that it is considerably faster than stereology. However, as the method is relatively new, concerns about its accuracy remain, particularly whether homogenization results in underestimation of cell number. In this study, we compared estimates of neuronal number in the telencephalon and 'rest of brain' (i.e. the diencephalon and brainstem excluding the optic lobes) of day old chicks using the IF method and stereology. RESULTS: In the telencephalon, there was a significant difference in estimates of neuronal number between the 2 methods, but not estimates of neuronal density (neurons/mg of tissue). Whereas in the 'rest of brain', there was a significant difference in estimates of neuronal density, but not neuronal number. In all cases, stereological estimates were lower than those obtained using the IF method. CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant differences, there was considerable overlap (all estimates were within 16% of one another) between estimates obtained using the two methods suggesting that the two methods provide comparable estimates of neuronal number in birds.