ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Logan local government area (LGA) in Queensland has the highest diabetes prevalence (6.5%) within Metro South Health (MSH). The study aimed to determine the burden of, and equity of access to secondary healthcare, for diabetic foot disease (DFD) for Logan residents to better inform healthcare services planning. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of hospital admissions data between January 2018 and December 2021. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All episodes of care for DFD provided by MSH hospitals to patients with a residential address in the three LGAs serving the region were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was number of episodes of care for DFD by LGA of residence and hospital of presentation. Secondary outcomes were DFD-related hospital occupied bed days and number of lower extremity amputations. RESULTS: Among residents in the MSH region, almost half of all episodes of care (47%) and bed days (48%) for DFD were for patients residing in Logan LGA. 40% of episodes of care, 57% of bed days and 73% of lower extremity amputations for DFD for these patients occurred outside of Logan LGA. These findings led to the planning of an integrated model of care for DFD at Logan hospital to improve and make care available locally. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that Logan residents with DFD had poor access to care despite the highest burden. Analysing epidemiology of care for DFD with an equity lens and highlighting gaps in service delivery is paramount to addressing the inequity paradigm.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Foot Diseases , Humans , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/surgery , Queensland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Patients , Health Services Accessibility , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The causes of death following colorectal resection remain poorly explored. Few studies have addressed whether early post-operative mortality is predominantly caused by a patient's medical co-morbidities, or from factors pertaining to the presenting surgical disease process itself. This study analyses data from the Queensland audit of surgical mortality (QASM) to report the causes of in-hospital death following colorectal resection, identifies whether these were due to either medical or surgical factors, and determines the patient characteristics associated with a medical cause of death. METHODS: Through analysis of QASM Surgical Case Forms, the causes of in-hospital death were determined in 750 patients who died in Queensland following colorectal resection between January 2010 and December 2020. Deaths were attributed to a specific medical or surgical cause, with multivariate analysis used to identify independent risk factors associated with a medical cause of death. RESULTS: In total, 395 patients (52.7%) died due to surgical causes and 355 (47.3%) died due to medical causes. Respiratory co-morbidities (OR 1.832, 95% CI: 1.267-2.650), advanced malignancy (OR 1.814, 95% CI: 1.262-2.607), neurological co-morbidities (OR 1.794, 95% CI: 1.168-2.757) and advanced age (OR 1.430, 95% CI: 1.013-2.017) were independent risk factors associated with increased risk of a medical cause of death. CONCLUSION: Even in the absence of complicating surgical factors, a significant number of patients died in hospital following colorectal resection due to their underlying co-morbidities. Multi-disciplinary models of care which allow for the early recognition and treatment of medical complications may reduce post-operative mortality in these patients.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Cause of Death , Hospital Mortality , Queensland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Medical AuditABSTRACT
Mixed epithelial-stromal tumours (MESTs) are a rare biphasic tumour that frequently arise in women from the renal and urogenital tract. They are also seen in men but are exceptionally uncommon with only few cases reported to originate from the seminal vesicles. Malignant transformation of its epithelial or stromal components is possible; however, by in large, these tumours are benign in nature. We report the case of a 48-year-old man with no remarkable medical or surgical history who presented with a huge expanding pelvic and intra-abdominal mass that required extensive surgical management including a pelvic exenteration. Histopathological analysis concluded the diagnosis of benign MEST originating from the seminal vesicles with no malignant features. No further systemic therapy was recommended for our patient. Given the technical intricacy in the operative resection of this tumour, we aim to present our findings and surgical management of this complex MEST.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: To assess the safety and feasibility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) during cytoreduction surgery (CRS) in advanced high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer within an Australian context. METHODS: Data were collected from 25 consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC from December 2018 to July 2022 at the Peritoneal Malignancy Service at the Mater Hospital Brisbane, Australia. Data collected included demographics, clinical variables, surgical procedures and complications and intra-operative and post-operative indexes of morbidity. RESULTS: Twenty-five women who underwent CRS and HIPEC from December 2018 to July 2022 were included in analysis. Findings indicate that CRS with HIPEC is associated with low morbidity. CONCLUSION: While judicious patient selection is imperative, HIPEC during CRS was well tolerated by all patients and morbidity was comparable to results from the previously reported OVHIPEC-1 trial. HIPEC appears to be a safe and feasible addition to CRS for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer in Australian practice.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emergency colorectal surgery tends to be associated with poorer outcomes compared to elective colorectal surgery. This study assessed the morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency and elective colorectal resection in two metropolitan hospitals. METHODS: Patients were identified retrospectively from two institutions between April 2018 and July 2020. Baseline, operative and postoperative parameters were collected for comparative analysis between emergency and elective surgery groups. A binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 454 patients underwent colorectal resection, 135 were emergency cases (29.74%) and 319 were elective cases (70.26%). Compared with elective resections, patients undergoing emergency resections were observed to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV (53.33% vs. 38.56%) (P = 0.004). The mortality rate was similar between the emergency and elective group (1.48% vs. 0.63%, P = 0.369). The overall complication rate was higher in patients undergoing emergency resections (64.44% vs. 36.68%, P < 0.001), but the major complication rate was similar between groups (12.59% vs. 10.34%, P = 0.484). Independent predictors for postoperative complications included emergency surgery (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.77, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.66 to 4.61) and an ASA Score of III to IV (OR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.84 to 4.47). CONCLUSION: The overall complication rate was higher in patients undergoing emergency colorectal resection, however, rates of major complications and mortality were similar between groups. Higher complication rates reflect advanced disease pathology in patients who are more comorbid.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal resection is a major gastrointestinal operation. Improvements in peri-operative care has led to improved outcomes; however, mortalities still occur. Using data from the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM), this study examines the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who died in hospital following colorectal resection, and also reports the primary cause of death in this population. METHODS: Patients who died in hospital following colorectal resection in Queensland between January 2010 and December 2020 were identified from the QASM database. RESULTS: There were 755 patients who died in the 10 year study period. Pre-operatively, the risk of death as subjectively determined by operating surgeons was 'considerable' in 397 cases (53.0%) and 'expected' in 90 cases (12.0%). The patients had a mean of 2.7 (±1.5) co-morbidities, and a mean American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3.6 (±0.8). Operations were categorised as emergency in 579 patients (77.2%), with 637 patients (85.0%) requiring post-operative Intensive Care Unit (ICU) support. The primary cause of death was related to a surgical cause in 395 patients (52.7%) and to a medical cause in 355 patients (47.3%). The primary causes of death were advanced surgical pathology (n=292, 38.9%), complications from surgery (n=103, 13.7%), complications arising from pre-existing medical co-morbidity (n=282, 37.6%) or new medical complications unrelated to pre-existing conditions (n=73, 9.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who died had significant co-morbidities and often presented emergently with an advanced surgical pathology. Surgical and medical causes of death both contributed equally to the mortality burden.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Postoperative Complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Queensland/epidemiology , RegistriesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) is a novel minimally invasive technique for treating pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) involving endoscopic assessment and treatment. This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study is the first Australian study of EPSiT and its largest long-term study to date. METHODS: From January 2014 to November 2019, 137 patients with PSD underwent EPSiT. Seventy-two had undergone previous surgery for PSD. Specialized Karl Storz video equipment (fistuloscope) was used. The rigid fistuloscope allowed direct visualization of cavities and secondary tracts. Cavities and tracts were then curetted endoscopically to remove all granulation tissues and hair/follicles. Ablation was then carried out under direct vision along with removal of debris. Patients were then followed up for a mean 56.2 months. RESULTS: 72.2% (n = 91) of patients undergoing EPSiT achieved primary healing (needing nil further intervention) at a median of 6 weeks; 13.5% (n = 17) experienced healing followed by recurrence while 14.3% (n = 18) experienced non-healing. Of the recurrence/non-healing groups, 20/35 underwent repeat EPSiT with healing occurring in 18/20 patients at a median of 7 weeks. The balance of patients (n = 15) underwent other definitive procedures. The mean operating time was 34 min. There were no major complications and 85% of patients were discharged the same day. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: EPSiT combines high efficacy of treatment for PSD along with relatively low rates of recurrence. The minimally invasive nature of the procedure means repeat procedures can be performed (where necessary) with low morbidity and a reasonable rate of success.
Subject(s)
Pilonidal Sinus , Skin Diseases , Australia , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pilonidal Sinus/surgery , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Appendicitis , Mesothelioma, Cystic , Mesothelioma , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Humans , Appendicitis/complications , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/surgery , Mesothelioma, Cystic/complications , Mesothelioma, Cystic/diagnosis , Mesothelioma, Cystic/surgery , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneum/pathology , Mesothelioma/complications , Mesothelioma/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a perceived risk factor for poorer surgical outcomes, including increased complication rates and mortality. As obesity rates rise annually, evaluating surgical outcomes in the obese population has become increasingly important. This study examines the impact of obesity on outcomes following emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent emergency LC for acute cholecystitis between March 2018 and March 2021 was performed. A total of 326 patients were included and stratified by body mass index (BMI) into two groups: obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2 , n = 156) and non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2 , n = 170). Primary outcomes included length of stay, time to definitive surgery, and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included total operative time and intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Obese patients were younger than non-obese patients (median, 45 [34.3-56.8] and 48.5 [34.0-66.3] years; p < 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes (13.5% versus 6.5%; p = 0.034). Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (p < 0.001) and operative grading scores were observed in the obese group (76.3% versus 40.6%, p < 0.001), who were more likely to have a distended gallbladder (19.9% versus 11.2%, p = 0.030) and gallstone impaction (23.1% versus 11.8%, p = 0.007) in comparison to the non-obese group. Length of hospital stay, time to definitive surgery, and postoperative complication rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Although obesity is associated with greater technical difficulty during surgery than non-obese patients, similar postoperative outcomes were achieved. Obesity should not be a contraindication for LC and can be safely performed in the emergency setting.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis, Acute , Gallstones , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystitis, Acute/complications , Cholecystitis, Acute/surgery , Gallstones/complications , Gallstones/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: The implementation of the acute surgical unit (ASU) model has been demonstrated to improve care outcomes for the emergency general surgery patient in comparison to the traditional "on call" model. Currently, only few studies have evaluated surgical outcomes of the ASU model in patients with acute biliary pathologies. This is the first comparative study of two different emergency surgery structures in the acute management of patients with acute cholecystitis and biliary colic. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and biliary colic at two tertiary hospitals between April 2018 and March 2019 was conducted. Primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, time from admission to definitive surgery, and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes include proportion of cases performed during daylight hours, length of operating time, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, and consultant surgeon involvement. Results: A total of 339 patients presented with acute biliary symptoms and were managed operatively. Univariate analysis identified a shorter mean time to surgery in the traditional group compared to the ASU group (29.2 hours versus 43.1 hours; P < .001). There was no difference in mean length of stay, operation duration between models, and postoperative complication rates between groups, with the majority of surgeries performed during daylight hours. The ASU group had a greater proportion of consultant-led cases (48.2% versus 2.5%, P < .001) compared to the traditional group. Conclusion: Patients with acute biliary pathology requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy achieve equivalent surgical outcomes irrespective of the model of acute surgical care.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis, Acute , Colic , Cholecystectomy , Cholecystitis, Acute/diagnosis , Cholecystitis, Acute/surgery , Colic/surgery , Humans , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) is a novel minimally invasive & sphincter-saving technique for treating complex fistula-in-ano involving endoscopic assessment & treatment of perianal fistula. This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study is the first Australian study of VAAFT. It is also the longest study of VAAFT to-date. METHODS: From January 2014 to September 2019, 59 patients with a complex anal fistula were identified via MRI & underwent VAAFT. Fourteen patients had undergone previous definitive surgery for anal fistula. Specialized Karl Storz video equipment (fistuloscope) was used in the procedure. The rigid fistuloscope was used to directly visualize the fistula tract/s & internal opening. Closure of the internal opening was then performed. The fistula tract/s were then treated via fulguration. The external opening was kept patent & dressed. Patients were then followed up for a mean 59.5 months. RESULTS: 67.9% (n = 38) of patients achieved primary healing (needing nil further intervention) at a median of 13 weeks. 12.5% (n = 7) experienced healing followed by recurrence while 19.6% (n = 11) experienced non-healing. Of the recurrence/non-healing groups, 11/18 underwent repeat VAAFT with healing occurring in 10/11 patients at a median of 7 weeks. The mean operating time was 41.1 min. There were no major complications & continence scores were not affected. Three patients were lost to follow up. CONCLUSION: VAAFT is both effective & safe for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano. Its minimally invasive nature means that in the instance of recurrence or persistence, VAAFT can be repeated with minimal morbidity & reasonable likelihood of success.
Subject(s)
Rectal Fistula , Video-Assisted Surgery , Anal Canal/surgery , Australia , Humans , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Video-Assisted Surgery/methodsABSTRACT
AIM: Appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare entity, with recurrence rates up to 26% despite optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Evidence specific to PMP originating from non-infiltrative appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (low grade - LAMN and high grade - HAMN) is lacking. The aim of this study was to identify patterns of recurrence and predictive factors for patients appropriate for iterative surgery. METHOD: A bi-institutional retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing complete cytoreduction and HIPEC for PMP derived from perforated LAMN or HAMN. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors for re-do CRS. Five-year overall survival (OS) was stratified according to surgical intervention, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was stratified according to histological PMP grade. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for OS and DFS. RESULTS: Sixty of 239 (25.1%) patients developed peritoneal recurrence between 2007 and 2020. The median time to recurrence was 20.7 months. The risk of disease recurrence was highest with high-grade PMP (P <0.001) and increasing PCI (P <0.001). Patients with high-grade histology from their index procedure and aged over 60 years were less likely to be offered iterative surgery on multivariate analysis. Patients who underwent iterative CRS and HIPEC had a 5-year survival of 100%. CONCLUSION: Iterative CRS and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with recurrent PMP, displaying good oncological outcomes. Age, index histology and level of abdominal quadrant involvement are predictive of proceeding to re-do surgery.
Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei , Aged , Appendiceal Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Australia, there has been a shift from the traditional 'on-call' surgical model to the 'acute surgical unit' (ASU) model to improve outcomes in acute general surgery. Using emergency appendicectomy as a standardized procedure, we aimed to identify the different patterns of care between these on-call structures by comparing two metropolitan district hospitals; one that employs a traditional on-call model and the other, which employ the ASU model. METHODS: Data on consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendectomies at the two hospitals (traditional and ASU model) between July 2018 and December 2018 were retrieved for retrospective review. Patient factors, preoperative factors, operative factors and post-operative outcomes were collected and tabulated for comparative analysis between the traditional versus ASU model of care. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated that there were a greater proportion of consultant-led cases (P < 0.001), a shorter time to theatre (P = 0.047) and a greater number of out-of-hours operations (P < 0.001) in the ASU model compared to the traditional model. A larger proportion of patients from the traditional model underwent a computed tomography scan as part of their diagnostic workup compared to the ASU model (P < 0.001). There was no difference in negative appendicectomy rates, intraoperative conversion rates, post-operative complication rates or mean lengths of hospital stay between the two on-call models. CONCLUSION: The ASU and traditional on-call model appears to achieve equivalent care outcomes for patients with acute appendicitis.
Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Appendicitis , Appendicitis/surgery , Australia , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surgery Department, HospitalSubject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Narrow Band Imaging/methods , Adenoma/pathology , Australasia/epidemiology , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Optical diagnosis allows for real-time endoscopic assessment of colorectal polyp histology and consists of the resect and discard and diagnose and leave paradigms. This survey assessed patient acceptance of optical diagnosis and their responses to a hypothetical doomsday scenario. METHODS: We conducted a 3-month cross-sectional survey of colonoscopy outpatients presenting to an Australian academic endoscopy center. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients completed the survey (76.0% response rate). The 60.8% of patients who supported resect and discard were more likely to be older men who co-supported diagnose and leave. Fewer patients (49.6%) supported diagnose and leave. A family history of missed cancer diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; P = .003) was significantly associated with rejection of resect and discard, and a personal or family history of bowel cancer (OR, 0.7; P = .04) was significantly associated with rejection of diagnose and leave. In the hypothetical scenario of a cancerous polyp incorrectly left in situ leading to stage III disease, 208 (21.2%) patients would definitely ask for financial compensation, 584 (59.5%) were unsure, and 189 (19.3%) would definitely not seek compensation. The patient-proposed median value of compensation sought was $760,000 USD ($1,000,000 AUD; $1 AUD = $0.76 USD). Notably, 18.5% would be willing to give optical diagnosis another chance after this error. CONCLUSION: Patient support for optical diagnosis is limited, and those who are not supporters are more likely to seek financial compensation if errors occur.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Diagnostic Errors , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Rectal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Age Factors , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Compensation and Redress , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delayed Diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Rectal Diseases/pathology , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Sex Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Crohn Disease , Ileocecal Valve/pathology , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Colonoscopy/methods , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/therapy , Humans , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/instrumentation , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/methods , Risk Adjustment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Sigmoid-urachal fistula is exceedingly rare in adults and only a few cases have been reported in the world literature. We present the case of a 54-year-old man with symptomatic sigmoid-urachal fistula managed successfully with a laparoscopic assisted high anterior resection, primary anastomosis and an en bloc resection of the urachal cyst and the involved cuff of bladder.
Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colon/surgery , Intestinal Fistula/surgery , Laparoscopy , Sigmoid Diseases/surgery , Urachal Cyst/surgery , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical , Colon/pathology , Humans , Intestinal Fistula/diagnosis , Intestinal Fistula/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Sigmoid Diseases/diagnosis , Sigmoid Diseases/pathology , Urachal Cyst/diagnosis , Urachal Cyst/pathology , Urinary Bladder/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: While left sided colonic diverticular disease is common in Western countries, right sided colonic diverticular disease is rare. With increasing migration from Asia, many western countries including Australia, are now seeing more right sided diverticular disease, of which caecal diverticulitis is the commonest. This study aims to determine the incidence of caecal diverticulitis in patients presenting with colonic diverticulitis, as well as identify the symptoms and clinical features that may aid in making a pre-operative diagnosis. METHODS: Data was collected using the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital medical records database identifying patients diagnosed with colonic diverticulitis and, more specifically, those with caecal diverticulitis from January 2007 to December 2013. Only those patients who had confirmed caecal diverticulitis on imaging studies or at laparoscopy on their first admission were included in this study. RESULTS: A total of 632 patients with colonic diverticulitis were admitted to our institution over a seven-year period, of which 13 patients had caecal diverticulitis (2.06%). Of the 13 patients, twelve were of Asian background and ten were considered young (≤50 years of age). The main complaints were right sided abdominal pain (n = 11, 84.6%) and diarrhoea (n = 5, 38.5%). Nine were diagnosed using computed tomography (n = 9/10, 90%), three on laparoscopy and one using ultrasound (n = 1/2, 50%). Ten patients were treated successfully by conservative means. DISCUSSION: A high index of suspicion in Asian patients with atypical symptoms of appendicitis, especially diarrhoea, may provide the diagnosis of caecal diverticulitis.
ABSTRACT
We wished to determine whether changing our centre's practice of using Acticoat instead of Silvazine as our first-line burns dressing provided a better standard of care in terms of efficacy, cost and ease of use. A retrospective cohort study was performed examining 328 Silvazine treated patients from January 2000 to June 2001 and 241 Acticoat treated patients from July 2002 to July 2003. During those periods the respective dressings were used exclusively. There was no significant difference in age, %BSA and mechanism of burn between the groups. In the Silvazine group, 25.6% of children required grafting compared to 15.4% in the Acticoat group (p=0.001). When patients requiring grafting were excluded, the time taken for re-epithelialisation in the Acticoat group (14.9 days) was significantly less than that for the Silvazine group (18.3 days), p=0.047. There were more wounds requiring long term scar management in the Silvazine group (32.6%) compared to the Acticoat group (29.5%), however this was not significant. There was only one positive blood culture in each group, indicating that both Silvazine and Acticoat are potent antimicrobial agents. The use of Acticoat as our primary burns dressing has dramatically changed our clinical practice. Inpatients are now only 18% of the total admissions, with the vast majority of patients treated on an outpatient basis. In terms of cost, Acticoat was demonstrated to be less expensive over the treatment period than Silvazine . We have concluded that Acticoat is a safe, cost-effective, efficacious dressing that reduces the time for re-epithelialisation and the requirement for grafting and long term scar management, compared to Silvazine.