ABSTRACT
AIM: Limited data regarding stroke subtypes exist from South Asian countries. The aim of the study was to determine the pattern of ischemic stroke subtypes and their associated risk factors, in a 10-year long hospital-based registry in the South Indian city of Hyderabad. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Hyderabad stroke registry systematically collected clinical, radiological, and laboratory data of fully investigated consecutive stroke patients and studied pattern of ischemic stroke subtypes and their risk factor association. RESULTS: The cohort comprised of 2642 patients: 2072 (78.4%) were ischemic and 570 (21.6%) were hemorrhagic strokes. In the ischemic stroke cohort, the mean age was 54.1 years and 1622 (78.3%) were men. The most common ischemic stroke subtype was large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) comprising 37.6% (n = 779), followed by small vessel occlusion comprising 19.9% (n = 413) and cardioembolism 11% (n = 228). Stroke of other determined etiologies constituted 4.2% (n = 86) and stroke of undetermined etiology was observed in 27.3%. Among patients with LAA, 610 (78.3%) patients had intracranial and 169 (21.7%) had extracranial disease as the underlying mechanism. Risk factor profile demonstrated that hyperlipidemia was significantly associated with LAA and ischemic heart disease with cardioembolic strokes. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals a distinct pattern of ischemic stroke subtypes in the Indian context that has overlapping features of registries from West and East Asian countries. Both large artery and small vessel diseases are substantially represented with a predominance of intracranial atherosclerosis. The study results have significant implications for developing preventive and management strategies for stroke care and research in India.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose chlorthalidone + atenolol combination with atenolol and atenolol + amlodipine combination in stage I hypertensive patients uncontrolled on active run-in monotherapy. METHODS: Newly diagnosed stage I hypertensive patients were randomized to active run-in monotherapy either with atenolol 25 mg (98/300) or chlorthalidone 6.25 mg (100/300) or amlodipine 2.5 mg (102/300). A total of 282/300 patients (atenolol 92, chlorthalidone 91, amlodipine 99) completed the active run-in phase successfully. Patients uncontrolled on active run-in monotherapy (atenolol 33, chlorthalidone 45, amlodipine 47) received the study treatment, namely atenolol 50 mg alone, chlorthalidone 6.25 mg+atenolol 25 mg and atenolol 25 mg+amlodipine 2.5 mg, respectively. Efficacy of the therapy was evaluated by BP measurement at weeks 12 and 20 post-therapy. RESULTS: Post-active run-in monotherapies, the study treatment groups showed a significant fall in mean SBP and DBP from baseline (p<0.05). The mean fall in SBP and DBP was comparable for study treatments (atenolol 50 mg, atenolol 25 mg+chlorthalidone 6.25 mg and atenolol 25 mg+amlodipine 2.5 mg) (p=0.337 for SBP and p=0.054 for DBP) at week 12 and (p=0.744 for SBP and p=0.855 for DBP) at week 20; also, the percentage of responders was comparable for the three study treatment groups (p=0.799) indicating that the low-dose chlorthalidone+atenolol combination is noninferior to the high-dose atenolol alone and atenolol+amlodipine combination. No serious laboratory/clinical adverse events were reported in this study. CONCLUSION: Chlorthalidone 6.25 mg in combination with atenolol 25 mg is effective and safe in stage I (JNC 7) essential hypertensive patients. This low dose of chlorthalidone could reduce dose-related concerns over metabolic adverse effects and may lead to wider usage of this proven antihypertensive agent in combination therapy.
