Pain-related hospitalization and emergency room visit following initial analgesic prescription after outpatient surgery.

PURPOSE: Our study examined the association between outpatient postsurgical analgesic prescription and risk of insufficiently managed pain characterized by pain-associated hospital admission and emergency room (ER) visit. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children 1-17 years of age who filled an incident analgesic following an outpatient surgery during 2013-2018. Pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit were measured within 30 days following the outpatient surgical procedure. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model with patients nested under prescribers was fitted to test the association between incident analgesic prescription and risk of having pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit. RESULTS: Of 14 277 children meeting the inclusion criteria, 6224 (43.6%) received an incident opioid and 8053 (56.4%) received an incident non-opioid analgesic prescription respectively. There were a total of 523 (3.7%) children undergoing surgical procedures that had pain-related hospital admissions or ER visits with 5.1% initiated on non-opioid analgesics and 1.8% on opioid analgesics. The multilevel model indicated that initial opioid analgesic recipients were 32% less likely of having a pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit [aOR: 0.68 (95% CI: 0.3-0.8)]. CONCLUSION: Majority of postsurgical patients do not require additional pain management strategies. In the 3.7% of patients requiring additional pain management strategies, those initiated on non-opioid analgesics are more likely to have a pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit compared with their opioid recipient counterparts.

Trends in Repeat Opioid Analgesic Prescription Utilization for Acute Pain in Children: 2013-2018.

OBJECTIVE: Our study examined the change in repeat opioid analgesic prescription trends in children and adolescents experiencing acute pain between 2013 and 2018. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children and adolescents between 1 and 17 years of age enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care plan and filled an incident opioid analgesic prescription from 2013 to 2018. A repeat opioid prescription was defined as receiving a subsequent opioid prescription within 30 days from the end of the incident opioid prescription. A generalized linear regression analysis was conducted to examine changes in repeat opioid analgesic dispensing over time at quarterly intervals from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 17,086 children and adolescents receiving an incident opioid analgesic. Of these, 1780 (10.4%) filled a repeat opioid analgesic prescription. There was a significant decline in the repeat opioid analgesic trend from 11.5% in Q1 2013 to 9.6% in Q4 2018. Stratified analyses by age, sex, and race and ethnicity in a sub-cohort of patients undergoing surgical procedures showed that a significant decline in repeat opioid utilization over time has been observed in all racial/ethnic groups stratified by age and sex, with the most significant decline found in non-Hispanic White children and Hispanic adolescents. At the end of the 6-year follow-up, the racial and ethnic variations in repeat opioid utilization associated with surgical procedures had significantly reduced in children yet persisted among adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of incident pediatric opioid analgesic recipients received a repeat opioid prescription. There has been a moderate but steady decline (∼7% per quarter) in repeat opioid analgesic utilization between 2013 and 2018.

Association Between Initial Opioid Prescription Duration and 30-Day Risk of Receiving Repeat Opioid Among Children.

OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the association between initial opioid prescription duration and receipt of a repeat opioid prescription in children. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children between 1 and 17 years of age who enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care plan and filled an incident opioid prescription during 2013 to 2018. An incident prescription was defined as receipt of an opioid analgesic without a prior use for 12 months. A repeat opioid prescription was defined as receipt of a subsequent opioid prescription within 30 days since the end of incident opioid prescription. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to test the association between incident opioid prescription duration and the likelihood of receiving a repeat prescription. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 17,086 children receiving an incident opioid prescription in which 6272 (36.7%) received 1 to 3 days' supply, 8442 (49.4%) received 4 to 7 days' supply, 1434 (8.4%) received 8 to 10 days' supply, and 938 (5.5%) received >10 days' supply. Of these incident opioid recipients, 1780 (10.4%) filled a repeat opioid prescription. The multilevel model results indicated that, children receiving 4 to 7 days' supply (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98 {0.9-1.1}), 8 to 10 days' supply (aOR: 1.03 [0.8-1.3]), and >10 days' supply (aOR: 0.85 [0.7-1.1]) had comparable likelihoods of receiving a repeat prescription as those receiving 1 to 3 days' supply. DISCUSSION: Nearly 10% of children who filled an opioid prescription for acute pain received a repeat prescription. Initial prescription duration was not associated with the risk of receiving a repeat prescription.

Risk of asthma exacerbation associated with opioid and nonopioid analgesic use in children with current asthma.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, asthma occurs in a vast proportion of children and adolescents. Asthma exacerbation is an acute episodic event typically characterized by difficulty in breathing, chest tightness, coughing, or wheezing. Severe asthma exacerbation can be life-threatening and lead to service utilizations such as hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. Opioid analgesic use can trigger an asthma exacerbation through 2 pharmacological mechanisms. Despite the potential mechanisms, there is lack of empirical evidence to determine the risk of asthma exacerbation and its association with opioid use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of asthma exacerbation in children with current asthma receiving an opioid vs a nonopioid analgesic. METHODS: Eligible individuals aged under 18 years with current asthma and receiving an incident analgesic prescription were identified from a large Medicaid managed care database during 2013-2018. Current asthma was defined as receipt of an asthma diagnosis and an antiasthmatic medication in the 12 months before analgesic medication initiation. Asthma exacerbation was defined as a hospitalization or ED visit with asthma as either the primary or secondary diagnosis within 3 days of receipt of an analgesic prescription. A weighted multivariable logistic regression using inverse probability treatment weighting was performed to test the association between use of analgesic medication and risk of asthma exacerbation. RESULTS: This study included 13,359 children with current asthma who filled either an incident opioid (n = 5,363, 40.1%) or nonopioid analgesic (n = 7,996, 59.9%) prescription. Asthma exacerbation was observed in 24 (0.5%) opioid analgesic recipients and 22 (0.3%) nonopioid analgesic recipients within 3 days of analgesic initiation. Weighted logistic regression results showed that children receiving opioid analgesics (adjusted odds ratio = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.9-2.9) did not have a statistically significantly higher risk of asthma exacerbation than their nonopioid analgesic recipient counterparts in the propensity score-weighted multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma exacerbation associated with analgesic use in children with current asthma was an uncommon event, and the risk was comparable among children receiving opioid vs nonopioid analgesics. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported and funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Project Number: 1R03HS026790-01A1. The study content was solely the responsibility of the authors, and AHRQ had no role in the design and conduct of the study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Impact of geographic access to primary care providers on pediatric behavioral health screening.

Behavioral Health (BH) screening is critical for early diagnosis and treatment of pediatric mental disorders. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of geographic access to primary care providers (PCP) on pediatric BH screening in children with different race/ethnicity. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2013-2016 administrative claims data from a large pediatric Medicaid Managed Care Plan that have been linked to 2010 US Census data and the 2017 National Provider Identifier (NPI) Registry. Geographic access was defined as the actual travel distance to nearest PCP and the PCP density within 10-mile travel radius from each individual's residence. Stratified multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between the geographic access to PCP and the likelihood of receiving screening for behavioral disorders within each racial/ethnic group. BH screening rate was 12.6% among 402,655 children and adolescents who met the inclusion criteria. Multivariable analysis stratified by individual race/ethnicity revealed that Hispanic and Black children were more vulnerable to the geographic access barriers than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. The increase in travel distance to the nearest PCP was negatively associated with screening uptake only among Hispanics (10-20 miles vs. 0-10 miles: OR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.71-0.86]; 20-30 miles vs. 0-10 miles: OR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.23-0.54]). In a subgroup that had access to at least one PCP within 10 miles of travel distance, the variation in PCP density had a greater impact on the screening uptake among Hispanics and Blacks than that in non-Hispanic Whites.

Utilization of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics in Medicaid and CHIP enrolled children with current asthma.

PURPOSE: Opioid analgesics are frequently dispensed in children despite its known risk in children with a compromised airway function. The objectives of the study were to assess the prevalence of opioid analgesic dispensing in children with current asthma and to identify patient and prescriber factors associated with the dispensing of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics. METHODS: Children <18 years of age, having current asthma and receiving an incident analgesic prescription were identified from a large Medicaid Managed Care Plan during years 2013 through 2018. Current asthma was defined as both receiving an asthma diagnosis and filling an anti-asthmatic medication during the 12-month period prior to the analgesic medication initiation. A scoring algorithm was applied to associate analgesic prescription with procedures and diagnoses according to perceived need for analgesia and time proximity. RESULTS: Of the 9529 children meeting the inclusion criteria, 2681 (28.1%) received an opioid prescription. Opioid analgesic dispensing was most common among children who had an outpatient surgery/procedure (29.4%), trauma (19.4%) dental procedure (18.4%), and respiratory infection (10.6%). Multivariable analysis indicated that non-Hispanic Black (AOR: 0.39[0.3-0.5]) and Hispanic (AOR: 0.51[0.4-0.6]) children were less likely to receive an opioid analgesic compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Children with prior history of asthma-related emergency department visit (AOR: 1.24[1.0-1.5]) and short acting beta agonist overuse (AOR: 1.33[1.1-1.7]) were more likely to fill an opioid analgesic prescription than those without. CONCLUSION: Opioid analgesics are frequently dispensed to children with asthma. A higher dispensing rate was observed among non-Hispanic White children and among those with a history of uncontrolled asthma.