Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 30(4): 366-81, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24677059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In view of high out-of-pocket costs and low spending even for basic healthcare for the poor employed in the unorganized sector, policy makers in India have turned their attention to developing a financing mechanism for social health insurance with the desire to provide quality care to the poor and economically disadvantaged. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess and determine the disease profile, treatment expenditure and willingness to pay for health insurance among rickshaw pullers in Delhi. METHODS: The study was conducted among 500 rickshaw pullers from five zones of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, taking a sample of 100 from each zone. RESULTS: The average cost of treatment was Rs.505 for outpatient and Rs. 3200 for inpatient care. To finance the treatment expenditure, 27.5% of the respondents spent from their household savings, and 43% had to borrow funds. Any "spell of sickness" and "total expenditure on acute illness" were significantly (p < 0.01) associated with the willingness to pay for health insurance. Overall, the majority (83%) of participants were willing to pay for health insurance. CONCLUSION: The study provides the evidence for the need for urgent policy development by introducing a social health insurance package including wage losses for the vulnerable groups such as rickshaw pullers in the unorganized sector in India, which significantly contribute to pollution free and cheap transportation of community, tourists and commercial goods as well.


Subject(s)
Community Networks , Employment , Financing, Personal , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , Transportation/methods , Adult , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , India , Insurance, Health/economics , Male
2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 15(4): 1659-65, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24641385

ABSTRACT

The present study conducted with 100 oral cancer patients at a private tertiary care hospital in Delhi demonstrated that stage III cancer was associated with longer use of tobacco and poor oral hygiene. There was also statistically significant association (p<.05) between consumption of tobacco and alcohol. More than 60% treatment expenditure was on surgery followed by accommodation (9%) and investigations (8%). The effect of tobacco was well known among patients as 76% of the patients knew that common cancer in tobacco chewer is 'oral cancer', 22% of the patients however responded that they did not know which cancer is common in tobacco chewers. 58% said that they learnt about ill effects of tobacco from media while 24% said they learnt from family and friends. Out of 78 tobacco users, 60 (77%) said that they never received help to quit tobacco while 18(23%) have received help to quit.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Mouth Neoplasms/economics , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Tobacco Use Disorder , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Oral Hygiene , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Tobacco, Smokeless/adverse effects
3.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 14(9): 5049-54, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24175774

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess the treatment pattern and expenditure incurred by cancer patients undergoing treatment at government tertiary hospitals in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 508 cancer patients randomly selected from tertiary cancer hospitals funded by central/state governments located in major cities of five states in India, namely Kerala, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, West Bengal and Mizoram, during March - May 2011 was conducted. Information related to direct costs, indirect costs and opportunity costs incurred on investigations and treatment, major source of payment and difficulties faced by patients during the course of treatment was collected. RESULTS: About 45% of the patients used private health facilities as the first point of contact for cancer related diseases as against 32% in public hospitals. About 47% sought private health facilities for cancer investigations, 21% at district/sub-district hospitals, and about 4% contacted primary health care facilities. A majority of the patients (76%) faced financial problems while undergoing treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of involving the primary health care system in the cancer prevention activities.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Private/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...