Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 183(5): 808-820, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scabies is a common parasitic skin condition that causes considerable morbidity globally. Clinical and epidemiological research for scabies has been limited by a lack of standardization of diagnostic methods. OBJECTIVES: To develop consensus criteria for the diagnosis of common scabies that could be implemented in a variety of settings. METHODS: Consensus diagnostic criteria were developed through a Delphi study with international experts. Detailed recommendations were collected from the expert panel to define the criteria features and guide their implementation. These comments were then combined with a comprehensive review of the available literature and the opinion of an expanded group of international experts to develop detailed, evidence-based definitions and diagnostic methods. RESULTS: The 2020 International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) Consensus Criteria for the Diagnosis of Scabies include three levels of diagnostic certainty and eight subcategories. Confirmed scabies (level A) requires direct visualization of the mite or its products. Clinical scabies (level B) and suspected scabies (level C) rely on clinical assessment of signs and symptoms. Evidence-based, consensus methods for microscopy, visualization and clinical symptoms and signs were developed, along with a media library. CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 IACS Criteria represent a pragmatic yet robust set of diagnostic features and methods. The criteria may be implemented in a range of research, public health and clinical settings by selecting the appropriate diagnostic levels and subcategories. These criteria may provide greater consistency and standardization for scabies diagnosis. Validation studies, development of training materials and development of survey methods are now required. What is already known about this topic? The diagnosis of scabies is limited by the lack of accurate, objective tests. Microscopy of skin scrapings can confirm the diagnosis, but it is insensitive, invasive and often impractical. Diagnosis usually relies on clinical assessment, although visualization using dermoscopy is becoming increasingly common. These diagnostic methods have not been standardized, hampering the interpretation of findings from clinical research and epidemiological surveys, and the development of scabies control strategies. What does this study add? International consensus diagnostic criteria for common scabies were developed through a Delphi study with global experts. The 2020 International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) Criteria categorize diagnosis at three levels of diagnostic certainty (confirmed, clinical and suspected scabies) and eight subcategories, and can be adapted to a range of research and public health settings. Detailed definitions and figures are included to aid training and implementation. The 2020 IACS Criteria may facilitate the standardization of scabies diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Scabies , Administration, Topical , Consensus , Humans , Scabies/diagnosis , Scabies/epidemiology , Skin
4.
J Trop Pediatr ; 46(6): 375-7, 2000 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11191153

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a complete course of antenatal steroids (dexamethasone 12 mg every 12 h x 2) on the complications of prematurity, in an era of surfactant replacement therapy in an Asian population. Between January 1995 and December 1998 we analysed all preterm births (-32 weeks) from women who had received antenatal care and delivered at our institution. Group A comprised those who did not receive, or received only an incomplete course of antenatal dexamethasone. Group B were those who received a complete course, i.e. delivered at least 24 h after commencing dexamethasone. There were 256 infants in Group A, and 168 in Group B. Mortality was significantly reduced (21.8 per cent in Group A vs. 10.7 per cent in Group B; p = 0.003), and the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) was increased (2.7 per cent in Group A vs. 10.1 per cent in Group B;p = 0.001) in those whose mothers received dexamethasone. There was no difference in the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), chronic lung disease, major intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or PVL. There was, however, a trend towards an increased number of septic episodes in infants of Group B. It was concluded that antenatal steroids reduced mortality, but had no effect on the incidence of RDS, PDA, CLD, major IVH or PVL in an Asian population who were given surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome. There was a trend towards greater neonatal infections. These results need to be confirmed in similar population groups.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Infant, Premature, Diseases/prevention & control , Prenatal Care , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Oman , Pregnancy , Pulmonary Surfactants/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...