ABSTRACT
The effect of combined use of alkaline electrolyzed water ï¼AlEWï¼ on the reduction of heat resistance of bacterial spores by high hydrostatic pressure processingï¼ HPPï¼ was investigated in this study. No reduction of heat resistance of bacterial spores, which was defined as the spore survival by heat treatment at 80â for 15 min, was observed by the treatment of single HPP with 30MPa at 50â even for 6 hours. However, a 3-log decrease in the viable bacterial spores was obtained by the combination of AlEW pretreatment with 1 hour of HPP treatment. An additional 2 hours duration of HPP treatment could inactivate more 2 logs of the viable bacterial spores. The obtained D value of bacterial spores treated by HPP was decreased to one-eighth by the pretreatment with AlEW when compared with the control sample. In case of the temperature during HPP treatment was 70â, bacterial spores did not reduce its heat resistance with lower pressuring levels. In case of the temperature during HPP treatment is high with lower pressure levels, bacterial spores did not reduce its heat resistance even when AlEW was combined as the pretreatment. It was considered that the decrease in heat resistance by AlEW was resulted from the weakening of surface layer of spores by protein dissolution with alkaline substance. No clear effect of high negative redox potential, which is a unique property of AlEW, on the reduction of heat resistance was recognized.
Subject(s)
Hot Temperature , Spores, Bacterial , Hydrostatic Pressure , Temperature , WaterABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic significance of the presence of intranuclear inclusions in clear cell carcinoma (CCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 98 imprint specimens and 53 ascites specimens from 98 ovarian carcinoma cases [28 CCCs, 37 serous carcinomas (SCs), 22 endometrioid carcinomas (ECs), and 11 mucinous carcinomas (MCs)]. We examined (1) frequency of intranuclear inclusion-positive cases of each ovarian carcinoma subtype, using imprint specimens, (2) frequency of intranuclear inclusion-positive cells of each ovarian carcinoma subtype, using imprint specimens, (3) frequency of intranuclear inclusion-positive cases of each ovarian carcinoma subtype, using ascites specimens, and (4) sensitivity and specificity of the presence of intranuclear inclusions for the cytological diagnosis of CCC. RESULTS: (1) The frequency of intranuclear inclusion-positive cases in CCC (96.4%) was significantly higher than in SC (13.5%), EC (13.6%), and MC (18.2%) (P < 0.001). Two or more intranuclear inclusions in a single nucleus were observed only in CCC. (2) The frequency of intranuclear inclusion-positive cells in CCC (median, 0.41%) was significantly higher than in non-CCC subtypes (0.010%) (P < 0.001). (3) Using ascites specimens, the frequency of intranuclear inclusion-positive cases in CCC (78.6%) was significantly higher than in SC (10.3%), EC (0%), and MC (0%) (P < 0.001). (4) The sensitivity of intranuclear inclusions was 96.4%, and the specificity was 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of intranuclear inclusions, in particular a high frequency and multiple intranuclear inclusions in a single nucleus, is useful for the cytological diagnosis of CCC. Furthermore, these results may be applicable to ascites cytology.
