Usefulness of an online learning program for new nursing faculty members.

The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of an online learning program, Learning Program for New Faculty Members, in conveying knowledge of educational practice to newly appointed nursing faculty members. The study participants were assistant professors and research associates from nursing programs in Japan, with less than 5 years of educational experience. In total, 99 people participated in this study, and data from 97 were analyzed. Participants in the control group (43) were frequency matched to those in the intervention group (54) for sex, age, final degree, clinical experience, and academic experience. A pre-test was conducted using an original questionnaire, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in knowledge about educational practice. The intervention group then participated in the Learning Program for New Faculty Members online, at their convenience. After the intervention, a post-test was conducted. In the intervention group, post-test scores were significantly higher for all items except Item 3 (Conducting Class). The intervention and control groups' post-test scores were 23.55 vs 16.90 for Item 1 (Student Understanding and Support), 28.20 vs 22.17 for Item 2 (Syllabus and Class Design) and 5.40 vs 2.97 for Item 4 (Understanding of Educational Theories). The Learning Program for New Faculty Members was therefore considered to be effective in helping newly appointed nursing faculty members to acquire knowledge. The program was able to overcome the time and environmental constraints of newly appointed nursing faculty members.

Comparison of clinical profile in elderly patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia, and those with community-acquired pneumonia.

AIM: Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) is a modified category of healthcare-associated pneumonia adjusted for the healthcare system of Japan. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality have not been well characterized in elderly patients with NHCAP. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 960 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years admitted for pneumonia. Baseline characteristics, severity, pathogen distribution, outcomes and risk factors for mortality were compared between patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and those with NHCAP. The applicability of age, dehydration, respiratory failure, orientation disturbance, and low BP (A-DROP) score, a standard severity index for CAP in Japan, was also evaluated in NHCAP. RESULTS: The study participants consisted of 373 patients (38.8%) with CAP and 587 (61.2%) with NHCAP. The patients with NHCAP were older and had poorer performance status (PS) and more comorbidities than those with CAP. The frequency of potentially drug-resistant (PDR) pathogens and in-hospital mortality were found in 10 (2.7%) and 17 patients (4.6%) with CAP, and 60 (10.2%) and 83 patients (14.1%) with NHCAP, respectively (P < 0.0001). The incidences of PDR pathogens and mortality were not significantly different among the criteria for NHCAP. The higher mortality was associated with PS, comorbidity with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3, and the coexistence of congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease and malignancy. A-DROP score was poor at predicting mortality in most patients with NHCAP. CONCLUSION: The current criteria for NHCAP seem to be appropriate for differentiating patients with poor outcomes from community-acquired pneumonia patients. It is essential to assess individual underlying conditions, such as PS and comorbidity, when caring for patients with NHCAP.