Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer with esophageal varices.

BACKGROUND: Heavy drinking is associated with esophageal cancer and esophageal varices. However, there are limited reports of endoscopic resection for esophageal cancer with esophageal varices. In this multicenter study, we clarified the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer with esophageal varices. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study, patients underwent esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection at 10 referral centers in Japan from January 2013 to December 2019. We analyzed characteristics including backgrounds and varices, treatment outcomes, and adverse events in cases with esophageal varices. RESULTS: A total of 1708 patients were evaluated, 27 (1.6%) of whom had esophageal varices. In patients with esophageal varices, the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were 100% and 77.8%, respectively. Patients with esophageal varices had longer procedure times than patients without esophageal varices (p = 0.015). There was no significant difference in adverse events. There was no significant difference in procedure time and number of adverse events between patients who underwent pretreatment and those who did not. There was no significant difference in these outcomes for patients with lesions on varices compared to those without. Child-Pugh classification and location of the lesions also did not affect these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer with esophageal varices could be treated endoscopically safely and effectively.

Characteristics of Gastric Stasis due to Deformation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Lower Part of the Stomach.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric stasis due to deformation occurs after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the lower part of the stomach. Endoscopic balloon dilation can improve gastric stasis due to stenosis; however, endoscopic balloon dilation cannot improve gastric stasis due to deformation. Furthermore, the characteristics of gastric stasis due to deformation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of gastric stasis due to deformation after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the lower part of the stomach, focusing on the differences between stenosis and deformation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients with gastric stasis after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the lower part of the stomach. We evaluated the characteristics of cases with gastric stasis due to deformation, such as the risk factors of deformation and the rate of deformation in each group with risk factors. RESULTS: Deformation was observed in 12% (5/41) of the patients with gastric stasis. All cases of deformation had a circumferential extent of the mucosal defect greater than 3/4. The number of cases with pyloric dissection was significantly lower in the deformation group than in the non-deformation group (0% vs. 72%; p = 0.004). The deformation group also had a significantly higher number of cases with angular dissection than the non-deformation group (100% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). Moreover, the deformation cases had a significantly larger specimen diameter (p < 0.001). Deformation was observed only in cases with angular and non-pyloric dissections. Deformation was not observed in cases with angular and pyloric dissections. CONCLUSIONS: All cases of gastric stasis due to deformation had a circumferential extent of the mucosal defect greater than 3/4. Deformation was also likely to occur in cases with a larger dissection that exceeded the angular region without pyloric dissection.

Risk-scoring system for predicting challenging cases of peroral endoscopic myotomy.

OBJECTIVES: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective treatment for esophageal motility disorders including achalasia and its variants. However, some surgeons have encountered challenging cases. This study aimed to develop a risk-scoring system to predict challenging cases of POEM. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent POEM between April 2015 and March 2020 at our hospital were included in this single-center retrospective study. Challenging cases of POEM were defined as patients with any of the following: (i) procedure time ≥90 min; (ii) mucosal perforation; (iii) pneumothorax; and (iv) major bleeding. A risk-scoring system for predicting challenging cases was developed based on multivariate logistic regression and internal validation was performed using the bootstrap method. Clinical usefulness was evaluated using a decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Of the 467 patients, 59 (12.6%) had challenging POEM. A risk-scoring system consisted of four variables: duration of symptoms ≥5 years (assigned score, 1 point), antithrombotics use (1 point), manometric diagnosis of achalasia variants (2 points), and dilation grade 3 (2 points). Our scoring system showed satisfactory discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.77) and calibration (slope, 0.99; 95% CI 0.65-1.35). The decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical usefulness. CONCLUSIONS: We established a risk-scoring system to predict challenging cases of POEM. This scoring system may aid the selection of patients who require treatment from experienced surgeons.

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions in proximity to a colonic diverticulum.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for diverticulum-associated colorectal lesions is generally contraindicated because of the high risk of perforation. Several studies on patients with such lesions treated with ESD have been reported recently. However, the feasibility and safety of ESD for lesions in proximity to a colonic diverticulum (D-ESD) have not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of D-ESD. METHODS: D-ESD was defined as ESD for lesions within approximately 3 mm of a diverticulum. Twenty-six consecutive patients who underwent D-ESD were included. Two strategic approaches were used depending on whether submucosal dissection of the diverticulum-related part was required (strategy B) or not (strategy A). Treatment outcomes and adverse events associated with each strategy were analyzed. RESULTS: The en bloc resection rate was 96.2%. The rates of R0 and curative resection in strategies A and B were 80.8%, 73.1%, 84.6%, and 70.6%, respectively. Two cases of intraoperative perforation and one case of delayed perforation occurred. The delayed perforation case required emergency surgery, but the other cases were managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: D-ESD may be a feasible treatment option. However, it should be performed in a high-volume center by expert hands because it requires highly skilled endoscopic techniques.

The importance of pH adjustment for preventing fibrin glue dissolution in the stomach: an in vitro study.

Combined use of fibrin glue and polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets has attracted attention as a preventive measure for complications associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, fibrin glue is a protein that may be dissolved by gastric acid. We evaluated the effect of artificial gastric acid on fibrin clot. The dissolution time of three layers of fibrin glue with PGA sheets was measured in five groups (pH 1.2, 2.0, 4.0, 5.5, and 6.0 with pepsin). Measurements of three samples per group were made. The mean number of the remaining layers at each measurement point was observed for 168 h. The time to complete dissolution of the three layers of fibrin gel in the three samples was 2.5 h at pH 1.2, 5 h at pH 2.0, 24 h at pH 4.0, and 48 h and 6 h at pH 5.5. In order to maintain fibrin glue in the stomach for a long period, there was a need to avoid pepsin activation secondary to acidification of gastric juice. The use of strong antacids is recommended.

Esophageal motility disorders missed during endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders are sometimes misdiagnosed on endoscopic examination. We aimed to identify the proportion of patients with esophageal motility disorders missed during endoscopy and their clinical characteristics. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with either disorder with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction or major disorders of peristalsis using high-resolution manometry in our hospital from April 2015 to March 2021 were included in this study. Missed esophageal motility disorders were defined as patients with any endoscopic misdiagnosis such as normal esophagus or esophagitis within 1 year before the manometric diagnosis. We determined the proportion of missed esophageal motility disorders and identified independent predictors of missed esophageal motility disorders using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 41/273 esophageal motility disorders (15.0%; 95% confidence interval 11.3-19.7%) were missed during endoscopy within 1 year before manometric diagnosis. In the stepwise logistic regression analysis, the following variables were selected as independent variables for patients with missed esophageal motility disorders during endoscopy: non-dilated esophagus (odds ratio = 4.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.81-13.12, p = 0.002), the presence of epiphrenic diverticulum (odds ratio = 8.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.88-42.65, p = 0.006), the use of transnasal endoscopy (odds ratio = 4.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.59-13.92, p = 0.005), and the combined use of esophagram (odds ratio = 0.023, 95% confidence interval: 0.0025-0.20, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Based on retrospective analysis, 15% of esophageal motility disorders were missed during endoscopy. Understanding the clinical characteristics of missed esophageal motility disorders could help improve endoscopic diagnoses.

Timing of pyloric stenosis and effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilation after pyloric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There have been studies on risk factors for stenosis after pyloric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the most appropriate strategies for the management of cases with these risk factors have not been established. This study aimed to investigate post-ESD management by evaluating the timing of stenosis and the effectiveness of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) after pyloric ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of pyloric ESD. We first reassessed risk factors for stenosis in multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve and defined patients with the identified risk factors as the risk group. The primary outcome was the timing of stenosis in the risk group assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We reviewed 159 cases with pyloric ESD and observed pyloric stenosis in 25 cases. Cases with circumferential mucosal defect ≥ 76% were identified as the risk group. The stenosis-free probability in the risk group was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79-100%), 94% (95% CI: 76-98%), and 85% (95% CI: 66-93%) on days 7, 14, and 21, respectively. It decreased every week thereafter and did not significantly change after day 56. Twenty-three stenosis cases, except for conservative improvement, including six whole circumferential pyloric ESD cases, were improved by EBD without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ESD stenosis often developed from the third to the eighth week. In all pyloric ESD cases, including whole circumferential pyloric ESD cases, pyloric stenosis was improved following EBD without complications.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with megaesophagus.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia are not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia with megaesophagus, which is one of the characteristics of advanced achalasia. METHODS: In total, 234 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy in our hospital from April 2015 to March 2019 were included in this retrospective observational study. Megaesophagus was defined as a maximum esophageal diameter of 6 cm or more. Outcomes, including clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3 without retreatment) at the 1-year follow-up, technical success, and perioperative complications, were investigated and compared between patients with and without megaesophagus. RESULTS: Eleven patients (4.7%) were diagnosed with megaesophagus. The clinical success rate achieved was 63.6% in patients with megaesophagus, with a significant decrease in the Eckardt score (6 vs. 2, p = 0.003) and integrated relaxation pressure (28 mmHg vs. 9 mmHg, p = 0.028). The technical success rate was 100%. However, patients with megaesophagus had a significantly lower clinical success rate than those without megaesophagus (63.6% vs. 96.0%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, patients with megaesophagus had significantly higher rates of major adverse events than those without megaesophagus (18.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy improved achalasia-related symptoms, and this was technically feasible in patients with megaesophagus. However, the clinical success rate was somewhat low, and the rate of major adverse events was high. Therefore, peroral endoscopic myotomy should be carefully performed for advanced achalasia with megaesophagus.