ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current strategies that target cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α), or signaling molecules (e.g., Janus kinase (JAK)) have advanced the management for allergies and autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism that underpins its clinical efficacy have largely remained elusive, especially in the local tissue environment. Here, we aimed to identify the genetic, epigenetic, and immunological targets of JAK inhibitors (JAKis), focusing on their effects on synovial fibroblasts (SFs), the major local effectors associated with destructive joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: SFs were activated by cytokines related to inflammation in RA, and were treated with three types of JAKis or a TNF-α inhibitor (TNFi). Dynamic changes in transcriptome and chromatin accessibility were profiled across samples to identify drug targets. Furthermore, the putative targets were validated using luciferase assays and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based genome editing. RESULTS: We found that both JAKis and the TNFi targeted the inflammatory module including IL6. Conversely, specific gene signatures that were preferentially inhibited by either of the drug classes were identified. Strikingly, RA risk enhancers for CD40 and TRAF1 were distinctively regulated by JAKis and the TNFi. We performed luciferase assays and CRISPR-based genome editing, and successfully fine-mapped the single causal variants in these loci, rs6074022-CD40 and rs7021049-TRAF1. CONCLUSIONS: JAKis and the TNFi had a direct impact on different RA risk enhancers, and we identified nucleotide-resolution targets for both drugs. Distinctive targets of clinically effective drugs could be useful for tailoring the application of these drugs and future design of more efficient treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing technology have improved our understanding of the immunological landscape of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to stratify the synovium from East Asian patients with RA by immune cell compositions and gain insight into the inflammatory drivers of each synovial phenotype. METHODS: Synovial tissues were obtained from East Asian patients in Japan with RA (n = 41) undergoing articular surgery. The cellular composition was quantified by a deconvolution approach using a public single-cell-based reference. Inflammatory pathway activity was calculated by gene set variation analysis, and chromatin accessibility was evaluated using assay of transposase accessible chromatin-sequencing. RESULTS: We stratified RA synovium into three distinct subtypes based on the hierarchical clustering of cellular composition data. One subtype was characterized by abundant HLA-DRAhigh synovial fibroblasts, autoimmune-associated B cells, GZMK+ GZMB+ CD8+ T cells, interleukin (IL)1-ß+ monocytes, and plasmablasts. In addition, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferons (IFNs), and IL-6 signaling were highly activated in this subtype, and the expression of various chemokines was significantly enhanced. Moreover, we found an open chromatin region overlapping with RA risk locus rs9405192 near the IRF4 gene, suggesting the genetic background influences the development of this inflammatory synovial state. The other two subtypes were characterized by increased IFNs and IL-6 signaling, and expression of molecules associated with degeneration, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study adds insights into the synovial heterogeneity in East Asian patients and shows a promising link with predominant inflammatory signals. Evaluating the site of inflammation has the potential to lead to appropriate drug selection that matches the individual pathology.
