Reappraisal of the current resectability criteria and optimal treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer.

Background: Recent advances in anticancer treatment and prolonged survival are the background of this study. The study aimed to reappraise the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) resectability criteria in pancreatic cancer and to propose optimal treatment strategies. Methods: Three hundred ninety-six consecutive patients with curative-intent surgery for pancreatic cancer from April 2011 to December 2022 were included. Overall survival based on the resectability criteria was analyzed, and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with overall survival. Results: The median survival times (MSTs) based on the current resectability status were 37.4, 20.1, and 26.6 months in resectable (R), in borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR) disease, respectively (P<0.001), revealing an inversion phenomenon between BR and UR. Using the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) criteria, the MST of biological BR disease was demonstrably worse than that of R disease (27.1 vs. 40.7 months, P=0.04), but no difference was observed between classical BR and UR locally advanced disease (18.8 vs. 18.7 months, P=0.97). Rather, ≤180° superior mesenteric artery (SMA) invasion was a more powerful prognostic factor than >180° SMA/celiac artery invasion in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.101, 95% confidence interval: 1.296-3.404, P=0.003). When biological BR was combined with BR, and BR with artery invasion was considered locally advanced disease as a new resectability criterion, the MSTs were 38.8, 23.5, and 18.5 months in the new R, new BR, and locally advanced groups, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions: The decision-making and treatment strategies based on our new classification in pancreatic cancer are considered reasonable for clinical practice.

Reconsideration of the clinical impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A dual-institution collaborative clinical study.

PURPOSE: We investigated true indication of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer and the optimal surgical timing in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A total of 687 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Survival analysis was performed by intention-to-treat analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. RESULTS: In resectable disease, the NAT group showed better overall survival (OS) compared with the upfront group. Multivariate analysis identified CA19-9 level (≥100 U/mL) and lymph node metastasis to be prognostic factors, and a tumor size of 25 mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict lymph node metastasis. There was no significant survival difference between patients with a tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL and those in the NAT group. In borderline resectable disease, OS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the upfront group. CEA (≥5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) were identified as prognostic factors; however, the OS of patients fulfilling these factors was worse than that of the NAT group. CONCLUSIONS: NAT could be unnecessary in patients with tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL in resectable disease. In borderline resectable disease, surgery should be delayed until tumor marker levels are well controlled.

The survival in octogenarians undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer and its association with the nutritional status.

PURPOSES: This study explored the association between the nutritional status and survival outcomes after pancreatic cancer surgery and reconsidered surgical indications in octogenarians. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-three consecutive pancreatic cancer patients who underwent resection were analyzed and grouped according to age (< 70 years old; septuagenarians [70-79 years old], and octogenarians [80-89 years old]). The Charlson age comorbidity index and nutritional parameters were recorded. Survival outcomes and their association with nutritional parameters and prognostic factors were examined. RESULTS: The overall survival was worse in the octogenarians than in other patients. The median overall survivals in the < 70 years old group, septuagenarians, and octogenarians were 27.2, 26.4, and 15.3 months, respectively (P = 0.0828). DUPAN-2 ≥ 150 U/mL, borderline resectable/unresectable tumors, blood loss volume ≥ 500 mL, and blood transfusion were predictors of the overall survival among octogenarians. Nutritional parameter values were worse in the octogenarians than in other patients. The octogenarian age group was not an independent predictor of postoperative complications in a univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcomes were poor in octogenarians. However, an age ≥ 80 years old alone should not be considered a contraindication for pancreatic cancer surgery. The maintenance of perioperative nutritional status is an important factor associated with the survival.

Clinical outcomes of organ-preserving pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: A multicenter nationwide survey in Japan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Whether organ-preserving pancreatic surgery has an advantage in postoperative short- and long-term outcomes or not is still unknown because only small case series studies have been available to date. In this multicenter retrospective study, we aimed to elucidate the clinical advantage and disadvantage of organ-preserving pancreatectomy among patients with low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors and benign pancreatic diseases. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with benign or low-malignant pancreatic tumor who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in 621 cases, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in 31 cases, middle pancreatectomy (MP) in 148 cases, distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 814 cases, and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) in 259 cases between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. Preoperative backgrounds, surgical outcomes and pre- and postoperative (3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months) nutritional status were compared between these procedures. RESULTS: In terms of short-term outcomes, the incidence of pancreatic fistula in patients who underwent MP was significantly higher than in patients with standard pancreatectomy. As for the long-term pancreatic functions in the cases of head or body lesion, both exocrine and endocrine functions after MP were significantly favorable compared with the PD group from 3 to 36 months after surgery. In pancreatic body or tail lesion, significant advantage of endocrine function, but not exocrine function, was found in the MP group compared to standard DP at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: MP may contribute to the improvement of postoperative quality of life for patients with pancreatic body low-malignant tumors, rather than PD or DP; however, reducing the incidence of short-term complications such as pancreatic fistula is a future challenge.

Isolated pancreatectomy using mesenteric approach.

In 1981, we developed the first antithrombogenic bypass catheter for the portal system. This catheter-bypass procedure relieved the time limitation caused by portal occlusion and facilitated safe and easy resection and reconstruction of the portal vein or hepatic artery. We thereafter explored isolated pancreatoduodenectomy, in which pancreatoduodenectomy is performed under non-touch isolation techniques. It is difficult to perform isolated pancreatoduodenectomy because of the complex arterial anatomy of the peripancreatic head region. In 1992, a mesenteric approach was developed for pancreatoduodenectomy. This approach allows dissection from the non-cancerous side and determination of both cancer-free margins and resectability followed by systematic lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery. This approach also enables early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery and dorsal pancreatic artery branches from the superior mesenteric artery, as well as complete excision of the total mesopancreas (which is thought to be the second portion of the pancreatic head nerve plexus). Through this development of the mesenteric approach and antithrombogenic catheter-bypass procedure, our isolated pancreatoduodenectomy was finally established in 1992. This is the ideal surgery for pancreatic head cancer from both surgical and oncological aspects. We herein introduce the precise surgical techniques.

ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is an isolation procedure in pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic body/tail cancer. Connective tissues around the bifurcation of the celiac axis are dissected, followed by median-to-left retroperitoneal dissection. This procedure has the potential to isolate blood and lymphatic flow to the area of the pancreatic body/tail and the spleen to be excised. This is achieved by division of the inflow artery, transection of the pancreas, and then division of the outflow vein in the early phases of surgery. In cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the procedure has been shown to decrease intraoperative blood loss and increase R0 resection rate by complete clearance of the lymph nodes. This trial investigates whether the isolation procedure can prolong the survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who undergo distal pancreatosplenectomy (DPS) compared with those that undergo the conventional approach. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with PDAC scheduled to undergo DPS are randomized before surgery to undergo either a conventional procedure (arm A) or to undergo the isolation procedure (arm B). In arm A, the pancreatic body, tail, and spleen are mobilized, followed by removal of the regional lymph nodes. The splenic vein is transected at the end of the procedure. The timing of division of the splenic artery (SA) is not restricted. In arm B, regional lymph nodes are dissected, then we transect the root of the SA, the pancreas, then the splenic vein. At the end of the procedure, the pancreatic body/tail and spleen are mobilized and removed. In total, 100 patients from multiple Japanese high-volume centers will be randomized. The primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative blood loss, R0 resection rate, and overall survival. DISCUSSION: If this trial shows that the isolation procedures can improve survival with a similar R0 rate and with a similar number of lymph node dissections to the conventional procedure, the isolation procedure is expected to become a standard procedure during DPS for PDAC. Conversely, if there were no significant differences in endpoints between the groups, it would demonstrate justification of either procedure from surgical and oncological points of view. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000041381 . Registered on 10 August 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04600063 . Registered on 22 October 2020.

Controlling the arterial supply into the pancreatic head region as a whole peripancreatic arterial arcade via a mesenteric approach during isolated pancreatoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: The peripancreatic arterial system forms various arterial arcades and collateral branches; therefore, it stands to reason that the arterial supply into the pancreatic head region should be controlled as a whole peripancreatic arterial arcade rather than as the three major supplying arteries during isolated pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). We investigated the clinical importance of early control of the whole peripancreatic arterial arcade during PD. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 63 consecutive patients who underwent PD via a mesenteric approach at our hospital between October, 2014 and February, 2017. The patients were divided into an early control group (n = 27) and a late control group (n = 36) for comparative analysis. RESULTS: The peripancreatic arterial arcades and collateral branches were seen on preoperative multidetector row computed tomography (CT) images and during PD in all 63 patients. The early control group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the late control group. Early control of the whole peripancreatic arterial arcade was an independent factor associated with lower intraoperative blood loss in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The arterial supply into the pancreatic head region should be controlled as a whole peripancreatic arterial arcade rather than as the three major supplying arteries during isolated PD.

Early ligation of the dorsal pancreatic artery with a mesenteric approach reduces intraoperative blood loss during pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery has been advocated to reduce blood loss during pancreatoduodenectomy. However, the impact of early ligation of the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) remains unclear. This study was performed to investigate the clinical implications of early ligation of the DPA. METHODS: From October 2014 to April 2017, 34 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy using a mesenteric approach. The patients were divided into the early DPA ligation group (n = 15) and late DPA ligation group (n = 19). The clinical features were retrospectively compared between the two groups (H29-044). RESULTS: Preoperative multidetector row computed tomography and intraoperative findings revealed that the right branch of the DPA supplied the pancreatic head region in all cases. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the early than late ligation group (median 609 ml [range 94-1,013 ml] vs. 764 ml [range 367-1,828 ml], respectively; P = 0.008). Multivariable analysis revealed that early DPA ligation was independently associated with blood loss (P = 0.023). The DPAs arising from the superior mesenteric artery underwent early ligation at a significantly higher rate. CONCLUSIONS: Early ligation of the DPA during pancreaticoduodenectomy with a mesenteric approach could reduce intraoperative blood loss.

Gastric venous congestion and bleeding in association with total pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Gastric venous congestion and bleeding in association with total pancreatectomy (TP) were evaluated. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients of TP were retrospectively analyzed. TP was classified as TP with distal gastrectomy (TPDG), pylorus-preserving TP (PPTP), subtotal stomach-preserving TP (SSPTP), and TP with segmental duodenectomy (TPSD). RESULTS: Portal vein or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction was performed in 24 patients (62.2%). Gastric bleeding occurred immediately after tumor resection in one of eight patients who underwent SSPTP, and urgent anastomosis between the right gastroepiploic and left ovarian vein stopped the bleeding. Another case of gastric bleeding was observed a few hours after TP in one of nine patients who underwent PPTP, and hemostasis was achieved after conservative therapy. Gastric bleeding was not observed in 16 patients who underwent TPDG and five who underwent TPSD. Some patients underwent preservation of gastric drainage veins (left gastric vein, right gastric vein, or right gastroepiploic vein). Neither patient with bleeding underwent preservation of a gastric drainage vein. CONCLUSIONS: To preserve the subtotal or whole stomach when performing TP, one of the gastric drainage veins should undergo preservation or reconstruction, and anastomosis between the right gastroepiploic vein and left ovarian vein may be beneficial.

Splenic vein reconstruction is unnecessary in pancreatoduodenectomy combined with resection of the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein confluence according to short-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric vein-portal vein confluence resection combined with pancreatoduodenectomy (SMPVrPD) is occasionally required for resection of pancreatic head tumors. It remains unclear whether such situations require splenic vein (SV) reconstruction for decompression of left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH). METHODS: The data from 93 of 104 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head malignancies were reviewed. Surgical outcomes in three groups-standard PD (control group), PD combined with vascular resection and SV preservation (SVp group), and SMPVrPD with SV resection (SVr group)-were compared. The influence of division and preservation of the two natural confluences (left gastric vein-portal vein and/or inferior mesenteric vein-SV confluences) on portal hemodynamics were evaluated using three-dimensional computed tomographic portography. RESULTS: No mortality occurred. The morbidity rates were not significantly different among the three groups (18/43, 8/21, and 7/29, respectively; p = 0.306). In the SVr group, three patients had gastric remnant venous congestion, and three had esophageal varices without hemorrhagic potential. No patients had splenomegaly, or severe or prolonged thrombocytopenia. These LSPH-associated findings were less frequently observed when the two confluences were preserved. CONCLUSIONS: SMPVrPD without SV reconstruction can be safely conducted. Additionally, preservation of these two confluences may reduce the risk of LSPH.

Mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Mesenteric approach is an artery-first approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In the present study, we evaluated clinical and oncological benefits of this procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreas head. Between 2000 and 2015, 237 consecutive PDAC patients underwent PD. Among them, 72 experienced the mesenteric approach (mesenteric group) and 165 the conventional approach (conventional group). A matched-pairs group consisted of 116 patients (58 patients in each group) matched for age, gender, resectability status, and neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in unmatched- and matched-pair analyses. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the mesenteric group than in the conventional group in both resectable PDAC (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC) on unmatched- and matched-pairs analyses (R-PDAC, unmatched: 312.5 vs 510 mL, P=.008; matched: 312.5 vs 501.5 mL, P=.023; BR-PDAC, unmatched: 507.5 vs 935 mL, P<.001; matched: 507.5 vs 920 mL, P=.003). Negative surgical margins (R0) and overall survival (OS) rates in the mesenteric group were better in R-PDAC patients (R0 rates, unmatched: 100% vs 87.7%, P=.044; matched: 100% vs 86.7%, P=.045; OS, unmatched: P=.008, matched: P=.021), although there were no significant differences in BR-PDAC patients. Mesenteric approach might reduce blood loss by early ligation of the vessels to the pancreatic head. Furthermore, it might increase R0 rate, leading to improvement of survival for R-PDAC patients. However, R0 and survival rates could not be improved only by the mesenteric approach for BR-PDAC patients. Therefore, effective multidisciplinary treatment is essential to improve survival in BR-PDAC patients.

The Mesenteric Approach in Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Isolated pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is an ideal surgery for pancreatic head cancer. In cancer surgery, 'isolated' means en bloc resection using a non-touch isolation technique. I have been developing isolated PD for pancreatic cancer since 1981. In this operation, the most important and first step is to use a mesenteric approach instead of Kocher's maneuver. The precise surgical techniques of the mesenteric approach are introduced in this paper.

Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Despite recent advances in surgical techniques including staple closure and ultrasonic devices, the reported incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) remains high. Therefore, we devised a new strategy in which the pancreatic stump is enveloped with the elevated jejunum (EJ) by a modified Blumgart anastomotic technique. Eighty-one patients who underwent open DP with splenectomy from January 2008 to December 2014 were enrolled. Comparisons were made between 42 patients who underwent placement of an EJ patch using the modified Blumgart method after scalpel transection and 39 patients who underwent scalpel transection alone, using unmatched and propensity score-matched analysis. After 25 patients from each group were selected by propensity score matching, the EJ patch technique was significantly associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant POPF (P = 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that the EJ patch was an independent predictor of a lower incidence of POPF (odds ratio, 0.16; 95 % confidence interval, 0.01­0.48; P = 0.017) as was the estimated remnant pancreatic volume. Addition of the EJ patch improves postoperative outcomes in patients who undergo open DP with splenectomy by scalpel transection and hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant.

Comparison of the international consensus guidelines for predicting malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the predictors of malignancy in the 2012 international consensus guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and validate their diagnostic value relative to the 2006 guidelines. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2014, 177 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection of IPMN were reviewed. Based on the 2012 guidelines, high-risk stigmata (mural nodule with enhancement, main pancreatic duct [MPD] ≥ 10 mm, and obstructive jaundice) and worrisome features (cyst size ≥ 30 mm, thickened cyst wall, mural nodule without enhancement, MPD 5-9 mm, an abrupt change in MPD diameter, and lymphadenopathy) were assessed, and predictive and diagnostic values were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified obstructive jaundice (odds ratio [OR], 23.9; P < .0001), abrupt change in MPD diameter (OR, 3.01; P = .017) and lymphadenopathy (OR, 5.84; P = .027) as independent predictive factors, with an accuracy of 69.8, 67.4, and 66.3%, respectively. Operative intervention was indicated in 156 patients (94.0%) using the 2006 guidelines, and in 130 (78.3%) using the 2012 guidelines. The accuracy of the 2006 guidelines was 35.5% compared with 44.8% for the 2012 guidelines. The area under the curve (AUC) for the 2006 and 2012 guidelines was 0.65 and 0.67, respectively; ΔAUC was 0.02, which was not statistically significant. When the worrisome features were combined with high-risk stigmata, the AUC increased to 0.79. CONCLUSION: Obstructive jaundice, abrupt change in MPD diameter, and lymphadenopathy were independent predictive factors in the 2012 guidelines with high accuracy. Using the new guidelines, the number of patients with IPMN managed with observation and the predictive accuracy increased.

Preoperative Identification of a Prognostic Factor for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To find predictive factors among computed tomography (CT) findings to identify pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G2 of World Health Organization classification. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors underwent multiphase contrast enhanced CT (unenhanced, arterial, pancreatic, portal and equilibrium phase), and attenuation values and imaging findings were examined. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed, and association between imaging findings and World Health Organization classification was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean CT attenuation value of NET G1 was significantly higher than that of NET G2 throughout the arterial, pancreatic, and portal phases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis according to tumor size revealed sensitivity: 83.3%, specificity: 92.0% and area under the curve (AUC): 0.853, whereas that of corrected true enhancement values in the pancreatic phase revealed sensitivity: 91.7%, specificity: 84.0% and AUC: 0.897, which showed the highest AUC. Specific CT findings, such as irregular tumor contour, vessel involvement, and cystic degeneration/necrosis, were significantly associated with NET G2, but not to the extent of CT attenuation value and tumor size. CONCLUSIONS: The CT enhancement in the pancreatic phase, and irregularity, vessel involvement, and cystic degeneration/necrosis were significant predictors of NET G2. These parameters might help in differentiating between NET G1 and G2, providing a basis for appropriate treatment.

Oral Food Intake Versus Fasting on Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial.

The usefulness of enteral nutrition via a nasointestinal tube for patients who develop postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after miscellaneous pancreatectomy procedures has been reported. However, no clear evidence regarding whether oral intake is beneficial or harmful during management of POPF after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is currently available.To investigate the effects of oral food intake on the healing process of POPF after DP.Multi-institutional randomized controlled trial in Nagoya University Hospital and 4 affiliated hospitals.Patients who developed POPF were randomly assigned to the dietary intake (DI) group (n = 15) or the fasted group (no dietary intake [NDI] group) (n = 15). The primary endpoint was the length of drain placement.No significant differences were found in the length of drain placement between the DI and NDI groups (12 [6-58] and 12 [7-112] days, respectively; P = 0.786). POPF progressed to a clinically relevant status (grade B/C) in 5 patients in the DI group and 4 patients in the NDI group (P = 0.690). POPF-related intra-abdominal hemorrhage was found in 1 patient in the NDI group but in no patients in the DI group (P = 0.309). There were no significant differences in POPF-related intra-abdominal hemorrhage, the incidence of other complications, or the length of the postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups.Food intake did not aggravate POPF and did not prolong drain placement or hospital stay after DP. There may be no need to avoid oral DI in patients with POPF.

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of Upfront Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Arterial Abutment.

Combined arterial resection during pancreatectomy can be a challenging treatment, and outcome would be more favorable if the tumor becomes technically removable from the artery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is expected to achieve locoregional control and enable margin-negative resection. To investigate the effects of NACRT in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) which were deemed borderline resectable through preoperative imaging due to abutment of the major artery, including the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or common hepatic artery (CHA), but were still considered to be technically removable. In the current study, comparisons were make between 71 patients who underwent upfront surgery and 21 patients who underwent NACRT followed by surgery in the strategy to preserve the artery, using unmatched and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (UMIN000017115). Fifty patients in the upfront surgery group and 18 in the NACRT group underwent curative resection (70% vs 86%, respectively; P = 0.16). The results of the propensity score weighted logistic regressions indicated that the incidences of pathological lymph node metastasis and a pathological positive resection margin were significantly lower in the NACRT group (odds ratio, 0.006; P < 0.001 and odds ratio, 0.007; P < 0.001, respectively). Among the propensity-score matched patients, the estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates in the upfront surgery group were 66.7% and 16.0%, respectively, and those in the NACRT group were 80.0% and 65.2%, respectively. In conclusion, it was suggested that chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery provided clinical benefits in patients with PDACs in contact with the SMA or CHA.

Significance of the Splenic Vein and Its Branches in Pancreatoduodenectomy with Resection of the Portal Vein System.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic head carcinoma frequently invades the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and/or portal vein (PV). We aimed to evaluate the outcome of transection of the splenic vein (SV) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with SMV and/or PV resection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 660 patients who had undergone pancreatectomy at our institution from January 2004 to October 2013, and selected 141 consecutive patients who had undergone PD with concurrent SMV/PV resection. Postoperative hypersplenism and the presence of remnant branches were evaluated. RESULTS: The SV had been transected in 81 patients and preserved in 60. Postoperative complications and white blood cell counts were similar between the groups. The postoperative splenic volume was not significantly associated with the status of the SV or IMV on the transected SV. The platelet count was significantly lower, and the incidence of collateral veins was higher after SV transection than after SV preservation until 6 months after surgery; these variables were similar in the long term. CONCLUSION: SV reconstruction might be unnecessary when SV transection is required. Preservation of the IMV on the remnant SV might not prevent sinistral portal hypertension.

Excess Weight Adversely Influences Treatment Length of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Retrospective Study of 900 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatectomy is still associated with a high morbidity rate, even in high-volume centers, and a leading cause of morbidity is represented by postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Many previous studies have evaluated the risk factors for the occurrence of POPF, but protracted courses of POPF have not been fully discussed. METHODS: This study included 900 patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 1991 and June 2013 after exclusion of patients who underwent total pancreatectomy. Subgroup analysis of the duration of drain placement was conducted among patients with POPF to identify predictive factors for a protracted course of POPF. RESULTS: Overall, 292 patients (32.4%) had clinically relevant POPF (grade B/C). The length of drain placement in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m(2) or greater was significantly longer than that in patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m(2) (44.8 ± 25.2 vs 33.8 ± 21.2 days, respectively; P = 0.001). The operative procedure, duct diameter, and pancreatic texture, which were independent risk factors for clinically relevant POPF, did not delay removal of the drainage tubes. CONCLUSIONS: A BMI of 25 kg/m(2) or greater was the only factor associated with delayed POPF healing. Vigilant postoperative management after pancreatectomy should be considered in obese patients.

A vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphism predicts malignant potential in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). METHODS: A total of 169 IPMN and 108 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative resection were enrolled, and VEGF +405G/C and -460C/T SNPs were investigated. RESULTS: Vascular endothelial growth factor +405C/C was found more frequently in malignant IPMNs compared with +405G/G (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; P = 0.04), and +405C allele was associated with malignant IPMNs compared with +405G (P = 0.055). In branch duct IPMNs, VEGF +405C/C was significantly associated with malignant transformation (CC vs GG: OR, 4.0; P = 0.03; CC vs CG + GG: OR, 3.3; P = 0.04), and there was a trend of VEGF +405C/C associated with malignant transformation of gastric-type IPMNs (CC vs GG: OR, 3.0; P = 0.07). When the survival outcomes were analyzed based on VEGF +405G/C SNPs, however, there was no relationship between VEGF SNPs and overall survival in patients with both IPMNs and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular endothelial growth factor +405G/C SNP was significantly associated with malignant transformation in IPMNs, especially branch duct and gastric-type IPMNs. Vascular endothelial growth factor +405G/C SNP might be helpful in predicting clinical course in pancreatic disease with potential for malignant transformation.