Heterogenous expansion of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells distinguishes high-risk sepsis immunophenotypes in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Understanding of immune cell phenotypes associated with inflammatory and immunosuppressive host responses in sepsis is imprecise, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the global sepsis burden is concentrated. In these settings, elucidation of immunophenotypes with prognostic importance is necessary to determine the relevance of emerging therapeutics and refine mechanistic investigations of sepsis immunopathology. METHODS: In a prospective cohort of adults hospitalized with suspected sepsis in Uganda (N = 43; median age 46 years [IQR 36-59], 24 [55.8%] living with HIV, 16 [37.2%] deceased at 60 days), we combined high-dimensional flow cytometry with unsupervised machine learning and manual gating to define peripheral immunophenotypes associated with increased risk of 60-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients who died showed heterogenous expansion of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs), with increased and decreased abundance of CD16negPD-L1dim and CD16brightPD-L1bright subsets, respectively, significantly associated with mortality. While differences between CD16negPD-L1dim cell abundance and mortality risk appeared consistent throughout the course of illness, those for the CD16brightPD-L1bright subset were more pronounced early after illness onset. Independent of HIV co-infection, depletion of CD4+ T cells, dendritic cells, and CD56-CD16bright NK cells were significantly associated with mortality risk, as was expansion of immature, CD56+CD16-CD11c+ NK cells. Abundance of T cells expressing inhibitory checkpoint proteins (PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG3) was similar between patients who died versus those who survived. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to define high risk immunophenotypes among adults with sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa, an immunologically distinct region where biologically informed treatment strategies are needed. More broadly, our findings highlight the clinical importance and complexity of MDSC expansion during sepsis and support emerging data that suggest a host-protective role for PD-L1 myeloid checkpoints in acute critical illness.

Integration of SARS-CoV-2 testing and genomic sequencing into influenza sentinel surveillance in Uganda, January to December 2022.

IMPORTANCE: Respiratory pathogens cause high rates of morbidity and mortality globally and have high pandemic potential. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, influenza surveillance was significantly interrupted because of resources being diverted to SARS-CoV-2 testing and sequencing. Based on recommendations from the World Health Organization, the Uganda Virus Research Institute, National Influenza Center laboratory integrated SARS-CoV-2 testing and genomic sequencing into the influenza surveillance program. We describe the results of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 testing of samples collected from 16 sentinel surveillance sites located throughout Uganda as well as SARS-CoV-2 testing and sequencing in other health centers. The surveillance system showed that both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza can be monitored in communities at the national level. The integration of SARS-CoV-2 detection and genomic surveillance into the influenza surveillance program will help facilitate the timely release of SARS-CoV-2 information for COVID-19 pandemic mitigation and provide important information regarding the persistent threat of influenza.

Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute.

INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs was evaluated. METHODS: A serological reference panel of 50 positive and 100 negative plasma specimens was developed from SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody positive patients and pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-negative specimens collected in 2016. Test performance of the 25 RDTs was evaluated against this panel. RESULTS: A total of 10 RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 13 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Four RDTs (Boson, MultiG, Standard Q, and VivaDiag) had both sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Only three RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 10 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies. Three RDTs (Autobio, MultiG, and Standard Q) had sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to combined IgG/IgM. The RDTs that performed well also had perfect or almost perfect inter-reader agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation identified three RDTs with a sensitivity and specificity to IgM/IgG antibodies of ≥98% with the potential for widespread antibody testing in Uganda.

Field evaluation of the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test in Uganda using nasopharyngeal samples.

OBJECTIVES: There is a high demand for SARS-CoV-2 testing to identify COVID-19 cases. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) is the recommended diagnostic test but a number of constraints prevent its widespread implementation, including cost. The aim of this study was to evaluate a low cost and easy to use rapid antigen test for diagnosing COVID-19 at the point of care. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 cases and low-risk volunteers were tested with the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test and the results were compared with the qRT-PCR results. RESULTS: In total, 262 samples were collected, including 90 qRT-PCR positives. The majority of samples were from males (89%) with a mean age of 34 years and only 13 (14%) of the positives were mildly symptomatic. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were 70.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 60-79) and 92% (95% CI: 87-96), respectively, and the diagnostic accuracy was 84% (95% CI: 79-88). The antigen test was more likely to be positive for samples with qRT-PCR Ct values ≤29, with a sensitivity of 92%. CONCLUSIONS: The STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test performed less than optimally in this evaluation. However, the test may still have an important role to play early in infection when timely access to molecular testing is not available but the results should be confirmed by qRT-PCR.