ABSTRACT
PROPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prognostic factors in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) patients and to assess their accuracy as predictors of a favorable neurological outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2009 and December 2017, we retrospectively analyzed witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who were admitted to our hospital and resuscitated with ECPR. We compared the baseline characteristics, pre-hospital clinical course, arrest causes, and blood samples on admission for the favorable and unfavorable outcome groups. RESULTS: Among the 135 patients included, 22 (16%) had a favorable neurological outcome. Low-flow time was shorter (median 38 vs. 48â¯min, pâ¯<â¯0.001) in the favorable neurological outcome group; in multiple logistic analyses, low-flow time was significantly associated with a favorable neurological outcome (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.94). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of low-flow time was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.89), and the cut-off value of 58â¯min corresponded to a sensitivity of 0.25 and a specificity of 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: In ECPR patients, low-flow time was significantly associated with a favorable neurological outcome, and ECPR should be performed within 58â¯min of the low-flow time.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Pulsatile Flow/physiology , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients resuscitated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), known as extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), bleeding is a common complication. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for bleeding complications in ECPR patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data for OHCA patients admitted to our hospital and resuscitated with ECPR between October 2009 and December 2016. We compared patients with and without major bleeding (i.e. the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium class≥3 bleeding) within 24h of hospital admission. Patients, whose bleeding complication was not evaluated, were excluded. RESULTS: During the study period, 133 OHCA patients were resuscitated with ECPR, of whom 102 (77%) were included. In total, 71 (70%) patients experienced major bleeding. There were significant differences in age (median 65 vs. 50years, P<0.001), prior antiplatelet therapy (25% vs. 3%, P=0.008), hemoglobin (median 11.6 vs. 12.6g/dL, P=0.003), platelet count (median 125 vs. 155×103/µL, P=0.001), and D-dimer levels on admission (median 18.8 vs. 6.7µg/mL, P<0.001) among patients with and those without major bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations between major bleeding and D-dimer levels (odds ratio, 1.066; 95% confidence interval, 1.018-1.116). Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve, which describes the accuracy of D-dimer levels in predicting major bleeding, was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.87). CONCLUSION: D-dimer levels may predict major bleeding in ECPR patients, suggesting that hyperfibrinolysis may be related to bleeding.