ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS), defined as neonatal sepsis occurring within the first week after birth, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Fetal scalp electrode application, used for fetal heart rate monitoring during labour, could potentially increase the risk of EONS. The objective of this study was to determine whether this practice is associated with a significant risk for EONS in term and late preterm pregnancies. METHODS: This case-control study enrolled subjects from three maternity hospitals in Edmonton. Cases were neonates with EONS who were born at ≥ 34 weeks between January 1, 2000, and March 1, 2011. Two control subjects were enrolled for each case identified. Control subjects were neonates of similar gestation (≥ 34 weeks), born at the same hospital site, who did not develop EONS. Maternal charts were accessed for information about fetal scalp electrode application and potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Forty cases and 80 control subjects were identified. There was no difference in the rate of exposure to fetal scalp electrode in cases (6/40) and control subjects (10/80) (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.42 to 3.68, P = 0.92). The association between fetal scalp electrode application and EONS remained non-significant despite adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: We did not detect an association between the use of fetal scalp electrode and EONS, but our study was powered to detect only a strong association between the exposure of interest and the disease outcome. We cannot rule out a weakly positive association that may still exist.
Subject(s)
Electrodes/adverse effects , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/etiology , Scalp , Sepsis/etiology , Adult , Alberta , Cardiotocography , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Sepsis/microbiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This investigation evaluated the efficacy of nalbuphine in treating postoperative opioid-induced pruritus (Pr) in pediatric patients. METHODS: After Ethics Board approval, the dual site, tertiary care teaching centre study recruited 212 subjects, age > or = seven years, who received opioid analgesia postoperatively. A modified, self-report colour analogue scale (CAS) scored pruritus intensity (PrI). Subjects who reported PrI score > or = 5/10 were randomized to treatment with nalbuphine 50 microg x kg(-1) iv (max 5 mg) or saline placebo. A pruritus intensity difference (PrID) > or = 50% was considered a positive outcome. RESULTS: Of 260 subjects approached, 212 consented and 184 received opioids. Median age was 13 yr (range 7-19) and median weight was 51 kg (range 19.6-134.8 kg). Pruritus intensity > or = 5/10 occurred in 37 (20.1%) subjects. Intravenous morphine [patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)/continuous infusion] was associated with Pr in 68% of subjects over a wide dose range (9.4-63.2 mug.kg(-1).hr(-1)). Pruritus occurred in 36% of patients in the PCA group compared to continuous opioid infusion (27%) and epidural administration (27%). Pruritus intensity difference > or = 50% was achieved in 55.6% of nalbuphine and 57.9% of saline-treated subjects. CONCLUSION: This preliminary report suggests that nalbuphine 50 microg x kg(-1) iv is not effective in treating postoperative opioid-induced pruritus in pediatric patients. The modified CAS score and PrID warrant further investigation.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Nalbuphine/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pruritus/chemically induced , Pruritus/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Data Collection , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Nalbuphine/administration & dosage , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This investigation evaluated the efficacy of nalbuphine in treating postoperative opioid-induced pruritus (Pr) in pediatric patients. METHODS: After Ethics Board approval, the dual site, tertiary care teaching centre study recruited 212 subjects, age ≥ seven years, who received opioid analgesia postoperatively. A modified, self-report colour analogue scale (CAS) scored pruritus intensity (PrI). Subjects who reported PrI score ≥ 5/10 were randomized to treatment with nalbuphine 50 µg·kg(-1) iv (max 5 mg) or saline placebo. A pruritus intensity difference (PrID) ≥ 50% was considered a positive outcome. RESULTS: Of 260 subjects approached, 212 consented and 184 received opioids. Median age was 13 yr (range 7-19) and median weight was 51 kg (range 19.6-134.8 kg). Pruritus intensity ≥ 5/10 occurred in 37 (20.1%) subjects. Intravenous morphine [patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)/continuous infusion] was associated with Pr in 68% of subjects over a wide dose range (9.4-63.2 µg·kg(-1)·hr(-1)). Pruritis occurred in 36% of patients in the PCA group compared to continuous opioid infusion (27%) and epidural administration (27%). Pruritus intensity difference ≥ 50% was achieved in 55.6% of nalbuphine and 57.9% of saline-treated subjects. CONCLUSION: This preliminary report suggests that nalbuphine 50 µg·kg(-1) iv is not effective in treating postoperative opioidinduced pruritus in pediatric patients. The modified CAS score and PrID warrant further investigation. OBJECTIF: Évaluer l'efficacité de la nalbuphine contre le prurit (Pr) postopératoire induit par les opioïdes chez des patients pédiatriques. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté 212 sujets de ≥ sept ans qui ont reçu une analgésie opioïde postopératoire. Une échelle analogique de couleur (EAC) modifiée pour l'auto-évaluation a mesuré les scores d'intensité du prurit (IPr). Répartis au hasard, les sujets dont les scores d'IPr étaient ≥ 5/10 ont reçu de la nalbuphine à 50 µg·kg(-1) iv (5 mg maximal) ou un placebo salin. Une différence d'intensité de prurit (DIPr) ≥50% était considérée positive. RéSULTATS: Des 260 sujets rencontrés, 212 ont participé à l'étude et 184 ont reçu des opioïdes. L'âge moyen a été de 13 ans (7-19) et le poids moyen de 51 kg (19,6-134,8 kg). Un prurit ≥ 5/10 a été noté chez 37 (20,1 %) des sujets. De la morphine intraveineuse [en analgésie auto-contrôlée (AAC) ou en perfusion continue] a été associée à du Pr chez 68 % des sujets pour un grand éventail de doses (9,4-63,2 µg·kg(-1)·h(-1)). Le prurit s'est manifesté chez 36 % des patients avec l'AAC comparée à la perfusion d'opioïde continue (27 %) et à l'administration péridurale (27 %). Une différence d'intensité du prurit ≥ 50 % a été atteinte chez 55,6 % des sujets qui recevaient la nalbuphine et 57,9 % de ceux qui avaient le placebo. CONCLUSION: La nalbuphine iv à 50 µg·kg(-1) n'est pas efficace pour traiter le prurit postopératoire induit par les opioïdes chez des patients pédiatriques. Le score modifié à l'EAC et la DIPr devront être étudiés plus à fond.
